|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:40 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 4:37 pm
|
|
|
|
SilentBlackTiger Melomaniacal I'm on the side that says things like "no johns," and "play to win." If you notice your opponent does something "cheap" consistently, take note of that and punish him. I mean, that's what makes us different than computers. We can adapt. But I can agree that certain FFA situations are different (secret alliances and whatnot, as you described). I don't know if "cheap" is the right word for it, but yeah, it is a bit unfair. Eh, FFAs are beat anyway xp I agree. 3nodding In fact, "No Johns" is part of my daily vocabulary. I have never heard "No Johns", what does it mean? Or like what context would someone use it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 9:49 pm
|
|
|
|
Lahlooooouh SilentBlackTiger Melomaniacal I'm on the side that says things like "no johns," and "play to win." If you notice your opponent does something "cheap" consistently, take note of that and punish him. I mean, that's what makes us different than computers. We can adapt. But I can agree that certain FFA situations are different (secret alliances and whatnot, as you described). I don't know if "cheap" is the right word for it, but yeah, it is a bit unfair. Eh, FFAs are beat anyway xp I agree. 3nodding In fact, "No Johns" is part of my daily vocabulary. I have never heard "No Johns", what does it mean? Or like what context would someone use it?
Johns: To make excuses. Ex: I'm not playing well because I was out drinking last night. I'm not doing well because this isn't my controller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 9:44 pm
|
|
|
|
SilentBlackTiger Lahlooooouh SilentBlackTiger Melomaniacal I'm on the side that says things like "no johns," and "play to win." If you notice your opponent does something "cheap" consistently, take note of that and punish him. I mean, that's what makes us different than computers. We can adapt. But I can agree that certain FFA situations are different (secret alliances and whatnot, as you described). I don't know if "cheap" is the right word for it, but yeah, it is a bit unfair. Eh, FFAs are beat anyway xp I agree. 3nodding In fact, "No Johns" is part of my daily vocabulary. I have never heard "No Johns", what does it mean? Or like what context would someone use it? Johns: To make excuses. Ex: I'm not playing well because I was out drinking last night. I'm not doing well because this isn't my controller. I use the controller excuse. My friend has horrible controllers, he let's me use the ones with food residue jamming the X and Y buttons, and a horrible thumb stick that was half bitten off. I think that's an exception to No Johns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:09 am
|
|
|
|
Erik of the PWG SilentBlackTiger Lahlooooouh SilentBlackTiger Melomaniacal I'm on the side that says things like "no johns," and "play to win." If you notice your opponent does something "cheap" consistently, take note of that and punish him. I mean, that's what makes us different than computers. We can adapt. But I can agree that certain FFA situations are different (secret alliances and whatnot, as you described). I don't know if "cheap" is the right word for it, but yeah, it is a bit unfair. Eh, FFAs are beat anyway xp I agree. 3nodding In fact, "No Johns" is part of my daily vocabulary. I have never heard "No Johns", what does it mean? Or like what context would someone use it? Johns: To make excuses. Ex: I'm not playing well because I was out drinking last night. I'm not doing well because this isn't my controller. I use the controller excuse. My friend has horrible controllers, he let's me use the ones with food residue jamming the X and Y buttons, and a horrible thumb stick that was half bitten off. I think that's an exception to No Johns. Solution: Bring your own controller. No Johns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 1:59 pm
|
|
|
|
Melomaniacal Erik of the PWG SilentBlackTiger Lahlooooouh SilentBlackTiger Melomaniacal I'm on the side that says things like "no johns," and "play to win." If you notice your opponent does something "cheap" consistently, take note of that and punish him. I mean, that's what makes us different than computers. We can adapt. But I can agree that certain FFA situations are different (secret alliances and whatnot, as you described). I don't know if "cheap" is the right word for it, but yeah, it is a bit unfair. Eh, FFAs are beat anyway xp I agree. 3nodding In fact, "No Johns" is part of my daily vocabulary. I have never heard "No Johns", what does it mean? Or like what context would someone use it? Johns: To make excuses. Ex: I'm not playing well because I was out drinking last night. I'm not doing well because this isn't my controller. I use the controller excuse. My friend has horrible controllers, he let's me use the ones with food residue jamming the X and Y buttons, and a horrible thumb stick that was half bitten off. I think that's an exception to No Johns. Solution: Bring your own controller. No Johns.
pwned. xd j/k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Melomaniacal Erik of the PWG SilentBlackTiger Lahlooooouh SilentBlackTiger Melomaniacal I'm on the side that says things like "no johns," and "play to win." If you notice your opponent does something "cheap" consistently, take note of that and punish him. I mean, that's what makes us different than computers. We can adapt. But I can agree that certain FFA situations are different (secret alliances and whatnot, as you described). I don't know if "cheap" is the right word for it, but yeah, it is a bit unfair. Eh, FFAs are beat anyway xp I agree. 3nodding In fact, "No Johns" is part of my daily vocabulary. I have never heard "No Johns", what does it mean? Or like what context would someone use it? Johns: To make excuses. Ex: I'm not playing well because I was out drinking last night. I'm not doing well because this isn't my controller. I use the controller excuse. My friend has horrible controllers, he let's me use the ones with food residue jamming the X and Y buttons, and a horrible thumb stick that was half bitten off. I think that's an exception to No Johns. Solution: Bring your own controller. No Johns. I asked, he said he had good ones. But I brong my own from now on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:22 pm
|
|
|
|
I think the only way of being cheap is using the same projectile/projectile combo over and over again from afar (or turtling). This can be avoidable, but it's still considered cheap.
Characters that can be cheap if used in the manner are Pit (SSBB), Link (SSBB, SSB if no combos are succeded), Toon Link (SSBB), Falco (SSBM,SSBB), Fox (SSB), Mario (all games), Luigi (all games, but less efficient), R.O.B. (SSBB), Wolf (SSBB), and others I might not think of ...
Game Legend:
SSBB = Super Smash Bros. Brawl SSBM = Super Smash Bros. Melee SSB = Super Smash Bros. (For Nintendo 64) All games = Cheap in all games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:46 pm
|
|
|
|
King_Ace D I think the only way of being cheap is using the same projectile/projectile combo over and over again from afar (or turtling). This can be avoidable, but it's still considered cheap. Characters that can be cheap if used in the manner are Pit (SSBB), Link (SSBB, SSB if no combos are succeded), Toon Link (SSBB), Falco (SSBM,SSBB), Fox (SSB), Mario (all games), Luigi (all games, but less efficient), R.O.B. (SSBB), Wolf (SSBB), and others I might not think of ... Game Legend: SSBB = Super Smash Bros. Brawl SSBM = Super Smash Bros. Melee SSB = Super Smash Bros. (For Nintendo 64) All games = Cheap in all games. I think we all know the Smash Bros abbreviations xp
But I wouldn't say Mario, Fox, Link, or Luigi can turtle well. All of their projectiles are easily avoidable, or not spamable. As for Fox, his projectiles have no knock-back, so it really doesn't prevent you from approaching at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
A Pharmaceutical Bandit King_Ace D I think the only way of being cheap is using the same projectile/projectile combo over and over again from afar (or turtling). This can be avoidable, but it's still considered cheap. Characters that can be cheap if used in the manner are Pit (SSBB), Link (SSBB, SSB if no combos are succeded), Toon Link (SSBB), Falco (SSBM,SSBB), Fox (SSB), Mario (all games), Luigi (all games, but less efficient), R.O.B. (SSBB), Wolf (SSBB), and others I might not think of ... Game Legend: SSBB = Super Smash Bros. Brawl SSBM = Super Smash Bros. Melee SSB = Super Smash Bros. (For Nintendo 64) All games = Cheap in all games. I think we all know the Smash Bros abbreviations xp But I wouldn't say Mario, Fox, Link, or Luigi can turtle well. All of their projectiles are easily avoidable, or not spamable. As for Fox, his projectiles have no knock-back, so it really doesn't prevent you from approaching at all. My abbreviations were to casual players/noobs xp
Mario and Luigi are inefficient turtlers, but Link (SSBB) and Fox (SSB, not the other ones) can turtle quite cheaply. Link's turtle move is boomerang immediately followed by a arrow which can be difficult to handle. Fox's gun in smash bros 64 can knock you back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|