Welcome to Gaia! ::

The Official Animal Lovers Guild

Back to Guilds

A guild for all animal lovers and pet owners 

Tags: animal lovers, pets, animals, cats birds dogs fish reptile, official animal lovers guild 

Reply Main Forum
7 Things You Didn't Know About PETA Goto Page: 1 2 3 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Sarahmooo
Captain

PostPosted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:08 pm
1) According to government documents, PETA employees have killed more than 19,200 dogs, cats, puppies, and kittens since 1998. This behavior continues despite PETA’s moralizing about the “unethical” treatment of animals by farmers, scientists, restaurant owners, circuses, hunters, fishermen, zookeepers, and countless other Americans. PETA puts to death over 90 percent of the animals it accepts from members of the public who expect the group to make a reasonable attempt to find them adoptive homes. PETA holds absolutely no open-adoption shelter hours at its Norfolk, VA headquarters, choosing instead to spend part of its $32 million annual income on a contract with a crematory service to periodically empty hundreds of animal bodies from its large walk-in freezer.

2) PETA president and co-founder Ingrid Newkirk has described her group’s overall goal as “total animal liberation.” This means the complete abolition of meat, milk, cheese, eggs, honey, zoos, aquariums, circuses, wool, leather, fur, silk, hunting, fishing, and pet ownership. In a 2003 profile of Newkirk in The New Yorker, author Michael Specter wrote that Newkirk has had at least one seeing-eye dog taken away from its blind owner. PETA is also against all medical research that requires the use of animals, including research aimed at curing AIDS and cancer.

3) PETA has given tens of thousands of dollars to convicted arsonists and other violent criminals. This includes a 2001 donation of $1,500 to the North American Earth Liberation Front (ELF), an FBI-certified “domestic terrorist” group responsible for dozens of firebombs and death threats. During the 1990s, PETA paid $70,200 to Rodney Coronado, an Animal Liberation Front (ALF) serial arsonist convicted of burning down a Michigan State University research laboratory. In his sentencing memorandum, a federal prosecutor implicated PETA president Ingrid Newkirk in that crime. PETA vegetarian campaign coordinator Bruce Friedrich has also told an animal rights convention that “blowing stuff up and smashing windows” is “a great way to bring about animal liberation,” adding, “Hallelujah to the people who are willing to do it.”

4) PETA activists regularly target children as young as six years old with anti-meat and anti-milk propaganda, even waiting outside their schools to intercept them without notifying their parents. One piece of kid-targeted PETA literature tells small children: “Your Mommy Kills Animals!” PETA brags that its messages reach over 1.2 million minor children, including 30,000 kids between the ages of 6 and 12, all contacted by e-mail without parental supervision. One PETA vice president told the Fox News Channel’s audience: “Our campaigns are always geared towards children, and they always will be.”

5) PETA’s president has said that “even if animal research resulted in a cure for AIDS, we would be against it.” And PETA has repeatedly attacked research foundations like the March of Dimes, the Pediatric AIDS Foundation, and the American Cancer Society, solely because they support animal-based research aimed at curing life-threatening diseases and birth defects. And PETA helped to start and manage a quasi-medical front group, the misnamed Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, to attack medical research head-on.

6) PETA has compared Jewish victims of the Nazi Holocaust to farm animals and Jesus Christ to pigs. PETA’s religious campaigns include a website that claims—despite ample evidence to the contrary—that Jesus Christ was a vegetarian. PETA holds protests at houses of worship, even suing one church that tried to protect its members from Sunday-morning harassment. Its billboards taunt Christians with the message that hogs “died for their sins.” PETA insists, contrary to centuries of rabbinical teaching, that the Jewish ritual of kosher slaughter shouldn’t be allowed. And its infamous “Holocaust on Your Plate” campaign crassly compared the Jewish victims of Nazi genocide to farm animals.

7) PETA frequently looks the other way when its celebrity spokespersons don’t practice what it preaches. As gossip bloggers and Hollywood journalists have noted, Pamela Anderson’s Dodge Viper (auctioned to benefit PETA) had a “luxurious leather interior”; Jenna Jameson was photographed fishing, slurping oysters, and wearing a leather jacket just weeks after launching an anti-leather campaign for PETA; Morrissey got an official “okay” from PETA after eating at a steakhouse; Dita von Teese has written about her love of furs and foie gras; Steve-O built a career out of abusing small animals on film; the officially “anti-fur” Eva Mendes often wears fur anyway; and Charlize Theron’s celebrated October 2007 Vogue cover shoot featured several suede garments. In 2008, “Baby Phat” designer Kimora Lee Simmons became a PETA spokesmodel despite working with fur and leather, after making a $20,000 donation to the animal rights group.

All information from www.PETAkillsanimals.com

What are your opinions on PETA?
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:29 pm
peta i used to be with them but now they are nuts i didnt no those seven things either  

K Furr KoOzy


Sarahmooo
Captain

PostPosted: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:45 pm
Yeah, they really are nuts.
Glad to hear you aren't with them anymore User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 7:06 pm
they are crazy....  


Itzybittzy



Sarahmooo
Captain

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:10 pm
Itzybittzy
they are crazy....

They really are.
I wish someone would just stop them.
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 3:22 am
what is also fun is some of their spokes people/what evers have to take insolen...and they use the animal insolen that is on the market...yet they say that they have no choice in the matter, for they need to stay alive to keep preaching their things.


REALLY SORRY for my bad spelling...it is early in the morning that I type this before I run off to work.  

Mistress of Rain

8,800 Points
  • Team Jacob 100
  • Noob wrangler 100
  • Pie Hoarder by Proxy 150

Sarahmooo
Captain

PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:50 am
Mistress of Rain
what is also fun is some of their spokes people/what evers have to take insolen...and they use the animal insolen that is on the market...yet they say that they have no choice in the matter, for they need to stay alive to keep preaching their things.


REALLY SORRY for my bad spelling...it is early in the morning that I type this before I run off to work.

Lol
It's all good.
You just need coffee.
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 8:16 am
i find it funny that they dont want animals helped. they are agaisnt animal testing. animal testing saves human lives and animal lives. some of my rats are alive today because drugs were tested on other rats.

also if we didnt have any contact with animals then i doubt that conservation efforts would be as effective or as popular without visual aids at zoos and such. so many species would die out.  

Shanna66

9,800 Points
  • Invisibility 100
  • Peoplewatcher 100
  • Full closet 200

Sarahmooo
Captain

PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:36 am
Shanna66
i find it funny that they dont want animals helped. they are agaisnt animal testing. animal testing saves human lives and animal lives. some of my rats are alive today because drugs were tested on other rats.

also if we didnt have any contact with animals then i doubt that conservation efforts would be as effective or as popular without visual aids at zoos and such. so many species would die out.

Aaagreed.
Not to mention, and although I hate the thought of killing any animal for our needs, if killing one rat for I dunno, a cure for cancer, then frankly, I'd be okay with losing one animal in the world to save thousands of people.
Testing make up and stuff on them though, that's ridiculous.
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:34 pm
Skittleo
Shanna66
i find it funny that they dont want animals helped. they are agaisnt animal testing. animal testing saves human lives and animal lives. some of my rats are alive today because drugs were tested on other rats.

also if we didnt have any contact with animals then i doubt that conservation efforts would be as effective or as popular without visual aids at zoos and such. so many species would die out.

Aaagreed.
Not to mention, and although I hate the thought of killing any animal for our needs, if killing one rat for I dunno, a cure for cancer, then frankly, I'd be okay with losing one animal in the world to save thousands of people.
Testing make up and stuff on them though, that's ridiculous.


i agree. the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

and testing cosmetics on animals is just wrong, there is no reason to do it because it doesnt help anyone, it just makes us feel better about ourselves  

Shanna66

9,800 Points
  • Invisibility 100
  • Peoplewatcher 100
  • Full closet 200

Sarahmooo
Captain

PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:58 am
Shanna66
Skittleo
Shanna66
i find it funny that they dont want animals helped. they are agaisnt animal testing. animal testing saves human lives and animal lives. some of my rats are alive today because drugs were tested on other rats.

also if we didnt have any contact with animals then i doubt that conservation efforts would be as effective or as popular without visual aids at zoos and such. so many species would die out.

Aaagreed.
Not to mention, and although I hate the thought of killing any animal for our needs, if killing one rat for I dunno, a cure for cancer, then frankly, I'd be okay with losing one animal in the world to save thousands of people.
Testing make up and stuff on them though, that's ridiculous.


i agree. the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

and testing cosmetics on animals is just wrong, there is no reason to do it because it doesnt help anyone, it just makes us feel better about ourselves

Exactlyyy.
I wear make up sometimes, but I'm that hippie chick that isn't going near any tested on animals. lol
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 23, 2009 9:04 am
Skittleo
Shanna66
Skittleo
Shanna66
i find it funny that they dont want animals helped. they are agaisnt animal testing. animal testing saves human lives and animal lives. some of my rats are alive today because drugs were tested on other rats.

also if we didnt have any contact with animals then i doubt that conservation efforts would be as effective or as popular without visual aids at zoos and such. so many species would die out.

Aaagreed.
Not to mention, and although I hate the thought of killing any animal for our needs, if killing one rat for I dunno, a cure for cancer, then frankly, I'd be okay with losing one animal in the world to save thousands of people.
Testing make up and stuff on them though, that's ridiculous.


i agree. the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

and testing cosmetics on animals is just wrong, there is no reason to do it because it doesnt help anyone, it just makes us feel better about ourselves

Exactlyyy.
I wear make up sometimes, but I'm that hippie chick that isn't going near any tested on animals. lol


i also try to go for products not tested on animals, same with soaps if i can afford them  

Shanna66

9,800 Points
  • Invisibility 100
  • Peoplewatcher 100
  • Full closet 200

Ophrysia

PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:47 pm
I've never liked PETA. They're a bunch of freaking hypocrites that do more harm to their cause than good. The only thing they seem to be good at is making themselves look like idiots.

That said, I'll just stick with the ASPCA, thanks. =/

On the subject of animal testing, as sad as it is, I think for medical purposes it's not a terrible thing. Not only can the research save thousands of people, but in some cases they may even find things in their research that could benifit veterinary science as well. So in a way it could be as helpful to animals as it is to people.

As for cosmetics, shampoo, etc... no. It's not necessary. With little things like that, if it's for people, then let people test it. Rats don't wear makeup, so why do we need to know how it affects them? If it's meant for animals, like pet shampoo, then by all means make them the test subject. Otherwise, no.  
PostPosted: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:31 pm
Ophrysia;
Exactly what I think.
 

Sarahmooo
Captain


Foofy_Miru

PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 1:29 am
Another tidbit about PETA: They want to eliminate all captive animal keeping. All of it. No dogs, no cats, no cows, no horses, no reptiles, no fish, no hamsters... Yeah. Ew.

They're also one of the main driving forces (alongside the Humane Society of the United States) behind the "Python bans"... AKA, the bans that aim to forbid captive keeping, breeding, etc of all Pythons (including, but not limited to, ball pythons, green tree pythons, and Burmese pythons) as well as the larger boas (Boa Constrictor, including the commonly kept Colombian "red tails" [B.C.Imperator] and much prettier "true" red tails [B.C.Constrictor]). That's just for now... Both HSUS and PETA would love to eliminate the reptile trade, right down to every last innocent little corn snake and gecko. =(

Ugh. PETA and HSUS give me nightmares.  
Reply
Main Forum

Goto Page: 1 2 3 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum