|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:14 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 11:29 am
|
|
|
|
ArmasTermin Fresnel If you're willing to overlook Bill Ruger being a gun-grabbing toady and communist sympathizer... yeah. Mini-14s are pretty cool. The fact is, the company offers some pretty snazzy guns. And if you're referring to those comments he made about "high capacity" magazines being unnecessary or some such nonsense, that was ten years ago, wasn't it? I guess it still stands, but what can you do? He's still selling great guns to the public. I don't support that position of his, but when you like a gun you can't help but like it. When some other company starts making GP-100s and Mini-14s and LCPs and LCRs I'll no longer consider giving Ruger my business. You can read into that as me supporting a company owned by a man whom doesn't support our rights, but in the end the quality of the equipment speaks for itself... ... ...doesn't it? It was made ten years ago, when the issue was hot on the table as the Brady Bill was being mulled over, and Bill Ruger was slightly less dead.
You're right though. Ruger makes some undeniably awesome guns. I just get this nagging voice every time I drool over one that says "you DO know who you're supporting, right?"
I'm trying to think of an alternative to the Mini-14 in .223, but all I can come up with would drop you into cheap AR range. In fact, I think the Mini-14 corners the market in cheap, semi-auto .223. If you were willing to pay some more though, the AR-180 is actually pretty cool. Only gripe I have with it is that it has no external button for the bolt hold-open. You gotta fish around in the mag well for it, or put in an empty mag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:15 pm
|
|
|
|
owenmarco Ubasti ArmasTermin EDIT: Also, on a completely unrelated note: why do I sometimes see reversed American flag patches on military/police uniforms? Why are they done like that sometimes? Like this: It's so that the flag always appears as if it is flapping away from the battle, because if it is flapping away from the battle it signifies that the flag itself is moving towards the battle, giving the impression that the soldier/sailor/airman/marine/police officer is moving towards the battle. THat is how my recruiter explained it to me as well. That's pretty much how I heard as well. Just like running with a flagpole towards the battle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 2:43 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:51 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:15 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel ArmasTermin So what other options are there for a semi-automatic carbine in .223 that's reliable, fairly accurate to 300 yards or so, and isn't an AR or come with an AR pricetag? I just don't really like ARs that much. Literally all I can find is the AR-15, the AR-18, the Mini-14, and a million military weapons. I suppose you could get an AUG or an FS2000 or similar assault rifle rip-off, but that's it. And they won't come cheap. Wait, doesn't Kel-Tec make a .223 carbine? Yes, yes they do. The ads in the NRA's magazines are pretty plain, but I much prefer that to the "ZOMG! MOST AWESOME GUN EVAR!" ads many companies run. It goves the facts and nothing more. Not even price, damnit.
It folds. Just like the SUB2000. There are also a couple different models. Mostly they're the same except the California model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:08 pm
|
|
|
|
Shrantic I have not heard good things about the Mini-14. I've been told they're inaccurate, unreliable, and not worth the price tag. However, that's just what I have heard; I have never shot a Mini-14. Really, I think you should go with an SKS if you want the same sort of gun for a better price. They're cheap, reliable, and passably accurate out to 150 yards. However, if you must have a rifle in .223, the AR-18 and Remington 7615P are both good alternatives. Though, the 7615P is pump-action. 7615's were MSRP'd well into AR-15 territory, and since they're discontinued, I doubt they got any cheaper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Shrantic I have not heard good things about the Mini-14. I've been told they're inaccurate, unreliable, and not worth the price tag. However, that's just what I have heard; I have never shot a Mini-14. Really, I think you should go with an SKS if you want the same sort of gun for a better price. They're cheap, reliable, and passably accurate out to 150 yards. However, if you must have a rifle in .223, the AR-18 and Remington 7615P are both good alternatives. Though, the 7615P is pump-action. 7615's were MSRP'd well into AR-15 territory, and since they're discontinued, I doubt they got any cheaper. OBJECTION!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|