|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 10:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 12:02 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 9:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:53 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 3:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 10:45 am
|
|
|
|
Requiem in Mortis I don't know where to stand on the idea. I'm very pro-2nd Amendment, but there probably are people on that list who have no business owning a gun. Unfortunately, the problem is determining WHY people are on the list, and if that is a good enough reason to bar them from buying a gun. I'm against it unless they can prove the person has no business owning a gun. Which basically means I'm against it. The list is entirely arbitrary, on some governmental a*****e's whims neutral
There is no standard for being placed on the list, and there is little to no recourse to get yourself OFF of the list. In fact, you don't even know if you are on it until you are stopped from doing something. Because it isn't published, and I bet they'll stonewall any FOIA requests. It's only a list of NAMES, and that's it. And as you damn well know, there are plenty of common names that people share.
And to boot, it violates the right to Due Process. There is no due process to getting put on the list and having your rights revoked. At all. Someone says "I want to ******** up this guy's day!" and does it. It's an unconstitutional ABOMINATION.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 4:39 pm
|
|
|
|
uryu ishida Requiem in Mortis I don't know where to stand on the idea. I'm very pro-2nd Amendment, but there probably are people on that list who have no business owning a gun. Unfortunately, the problem is determining WHY people are on the list, and if that is a good enough reason to bar them from buying a gun. I'm against it unless they can prove the person has no business owning a gun. Which basically means I'm against it. The list is entirely arbitrary, on some governmental a*****e's whims neutral There is no standard for being placed on the list, and there is little to no recourse to get yourself OFF of the list. In fact, you don't even know if you are on it until you are stopped from doing something. Because it isn't published, and I bet they'll stonewall any FOIA requests. It's only a list of NAMES, and that's it. And as you damn well know, there are plenty of common names that people share. And to boot, it violates the right to Due Process. There is no due process to getting put on the list and having your rights revoked. At all. Someone says "I want to ******** up this guy's day!" and does it. It's an unconstitutional ABOMINATION. Which is why I'm against it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|