|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2007 1:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:51 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:28 pm
|
|
|
|
Arphaxad Well, the point behind that is because Movies are a very different medium than books. Its a visual storytelling medium that has to be handled differently. While us hard-core book fans would enjoy a sentence-by-sentence movie version, the film producers and directors realize that the move must be in a marketable format which means 90 minutes to approximately 2 hours per film. Market research indicates that the bulk of the audience for these films is a younger crowd, hence a shorter movie... There's just no way hollywood will make an intensely detailed, unabridged movie version of a book - they hardly ever sell enough to make it worth their while. So, yes, we are stuck with movies that only present some of the more exiting book-bits... enough to tell a mostly coherent story on-screen.
. . . what he said. . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 5:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 6:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2007 10:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 5:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|