Welcome to Gaia! ::

Gaian Grammar Guild

Back to Guilds

The Gaian Grammar Guild is a refuge for the literate, a place for them to post and read posts without worrying about the nonsensical ones. 

Tags: grammar, literate, english, language 

Reply Literature
Jurassic Park

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:42 am


Has anyone actually read the book?

If you do, and have seen the movie, you'll note that they're fairly different.

Now, The Lost World is vastly different from the movie.

I could mention the kinds of differences, if anyone was interested in knowing, but I'm wondering if anyone has read either book.
PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:05 pm


Excuse my ignorance, but I didn't even know Jurassic Park was originally a book... I should have guessed, noting a lot of popular (and not-so-popular) movies are a spin-off of the book! I'd be interested in knowing the differences between movie and book smile

Persephones Son


Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:08 pm


Yes, it started as a book.

Here's some words about writing the book from the author, Michael Crichton:

Quote:
I wrote a screenplay about cloning a pterodactyl from fossil DNA in 1983, but the story wasn't convincing. I worked on it for several years since, trying to make it more credible. Finally I decided on a theme park setting, and wrote a novel from the point of view of a young boy who was present when the dinosaurs escaped. I then sent the book to the usual people who read my first drafts.

Over the years, I've come to rely on five or six people who read my drafts; generally they have a range of responses. Not this time. They were all in agreement: they hated Jurassic Park.

I got angry reactions such as, "Why would you write a book like this?" But when I asked them to explain exactly why they hated it, they couldn't put their finger on anything in particular. They just hated it, that's all. Hated every bit of it.

I wrote another draft. They hated that one, too. Just as strongly as the one before. Whatever I had done in the latest draft, it hadn't helped.

I wrote another draft, but the result remained the same.

Finally one of the readers said that they were irritated with the story because they wanted it to be from an adult point of view, not a kid point of view. They said, "I want this to be a story for me." Meaning for an adult.

So I rewrote it as an adult story.

And then everybody liked it.


Now, as for differences...

Most of the characters are different:

Dr. Alan Grant - A widowed man, with no romantic relationship with Dr. Sattler at this time (She's actually engaged to someone else). In the book, he also actually likes the kids and makes an effort to talk to Tim when he finds out about Tim's interest in dinosaurs.

Tim and Lex - Take the movie versions and flip them around. Tim is actually the older one that's into computers. He's 11 in the book. Lex is 8, and a typical 8 year old little daddy's girl (she's also very good at getting on people's nerves).

Hammond - He is not the sweet little old man you saw in the movies. He's actually a jerk, caring only about himself, his views and opinions, and money. Despite anything people say to him, or warnings or anything they might give him, he could care less. Even after the park goes down, he is still strongly against harming his animals. In this sense, he thinks he knows more than the experts.

Donald Gennaro - He's not the nerdy, whimpy, loser he was in the movie. He's actually described as being rather muscular, and ends up helping Muldoon in parts of the book. Sure, there are times where he's not terribly brave, but he certainly does his part.

Muldoon - Not too different from the movie, but he's much more cool in the book. He's more assertive and ready for action than he was in the movie.

The only characters that didn't change much were Arnold, Wu, Ellie, and Ian. I mean a few things changed, having more dialog and etc., but not a whole lot that's very noticeable.

Story differences:

It was more than just a handful of people in the island. Almost all of the staff it takes to run the island had been on the island during the problems caused by Nedry. There's at least 20 some people on the island.

The movie added some deaths that weren't in the book, and took away some that were. I think the book and movie only share the death of the same two people. The rest are different. We'll put it this way...

Movie Deaths: About 5 if I'm remembering right.
Book Deaths: About 8 if I'm remembering right.

There's a lot more action in the book, and Grant and the kids end up doing a lot more than you see in the movie, out in the park while trying to survive and get back. There's even some very fun parts with Muldoon.

There's a lot more dinosaurs, and more to the island complexes.

The diloposaurs were actually the proper dimensions. About 10 feet tall vs. that little dog sized creature from the movie, and they had no frill just the red V shaped crest on their heads.



That's all I can get from the top of my head for now.
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:59 pm


I have read both books and seen the movies like a million times and I LOVE THEM! They're awesome. But I have to admit, it was rather disappointing how many differences there were in the Lost World, it was almost a completely different movie. But they're still awesome.

availableforopening


Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 2:20 pm


Yes it was different in several ways.

If you were to say that the first book varied from the movie a bit, then you'd have to say the second varied from the movie a lot.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:54 am


Yeah. But at least it kept the same basic plotline. I just wish that they could kept Dalson and the others as the bad guys instead of InGen.

availableforopening


Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:18 pm


InGen was never exactly the good guys.
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:10 pm


No, they weren't, buy they weren't in the Lost World at all so it seems rather silly to have them in the movie when they were not in the book. I can not even recall them being mentioned in the book, can you?

availableforopening


Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:25 pm


Yeah. They're mentioned quite a few times, and one of them talks about how the company has basically gone under and has been dead for years.
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 8:29 am


That's right... I remember now. Oh, and one more thing about the move and the book is that there was only one kid in the movie and there were two in the book.

availableforopening


Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 5:22 pm


It might as well not even have been the same kid from the book.

The movie Kelly was a young black girl that was Malcolm's daughter. In the book she was a young white girl who had no relation to Malcolm and knew him through another character.
PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:30 pm


Yeah that was a little annoying. Spielburg completely switched around a bunch of roles, but he had permission from Crichton, so... I guess it was alright. I wish he would have kept it more to the book though.

availableforopening


Revear Tokoro

PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:58 am


Well it followed the events of the first movie better, instead of following the books. They started with the first movie, so it was easier to follow that.
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:41 am


In most films derived from a book, they're different. I've found that reading the book is more enjoyable than watching the film, or it is at least in most instances.

But I've never liked Jurasic Park, infact, I think it's fair to say that I hate it. I honestly don't think I could endure reading the books too...

Frankendoll.

Reply
Literature

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum