![User Image](https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p156/Zhouy/thstar.gif)
![User Image](https://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p156/Zhouy/thstar.gif)
Its perfectly logical.
You've just got your head shoved so far up your a$$ youe convinced yourself its wrong loljk
Why would anyone in their right mind endorse war and violence in something that is meant to provide fun and entertainment? The halo series advocates the human arrogance, in regards to Leaving earth, and taking over planets, And a false assumption that they deserve to reclaim the megastructures. Its not so much a battle agaisnt the Covenant for survival, but more of a "Haha, were human so automatically were better than you". The problem i have with this is that, it instills this undeserved sense of human superiority, and eventualy, this could possibly lead to a very simalr situation, That is, if the humans still exist by the time the technology has advanced to the level of Interstellar domination.
In a game like ratchet and clank, where everything is so rediculously absurd and farcical, and the level of cartoonishness being as high as it is, It caters better to a healthy entertainment, and more than likely never to become a "reality". Because its a comedic fantasy environment, The blowing sh!t up is used as slap stick comedy. The whole point of the games was to express your violence in a very unserious, satirical, and unrealistic setting.
Explain how Shooting Religiouis lizards with plasma guns is more helpful to the human ego than slapping up robots with a huge a$$ wrench.
Also, My ear is plugged, and i feel like running a knife trough it
and im hungry