In this age of mega-inflation, which do you find to be easiest to read? |
10,000,000,000g |
|
16% |
[ 5 ] |
10 billion gold |
|
25% |
[ 8 ] |
10 billion |
|
12% |
[ 4 ] |
10 bil |
|
19% |
[ 6 ] |
10^10g |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
10^10 gold |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Ten billion gold |
|
9% |
[ 3 ] |
Ten billion |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Ten bil |
|
3% |
[ 1 ] |
...What a stupid question. |
|
12% |
[ 4 ] |
|
Total Votes : 31 |
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
1414!
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
9265!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
7807!
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
1218!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:45 pm
can't the previous RNG be considered as 7,007? rofl Just hoping. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
5245!
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
3637!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
7561!
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 7:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
2975!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spider London generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
239!
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
4101!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
6871!
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
buchipeng generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
1055!
|
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agentBPena generated a random number between
1 and 10000 ...
319!
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:06 pm
buchipeng can't the previous RNG be considered as 7,007? rofl Just hoping. xd Meaning that I would mistake the 8 for a 0? Or what? cat_question Edit: Didn't see that it was an old post, but I still don't know what that means. cat_smile
|
|
|
|
|
High-functioning Shapeshifter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:10 pm
Kangit buchipeng can't the previous RNG be considered as 7,007? rofl Just hoping. xd Meaning that I would mistake the 8 for a 0? Or what? cat_question Haha! No,no, I didn't mean it like that. I was just talking to myself, hoping that those numbers would magically be 7007 so I'd have a shot at having Kinzie. xd Sorry for the confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|