Welcome to Gaia! ::

And so shall yours. Again, to quote Emerson, "The exclusionist in religion sees not that he shuts the door on Heaven to himself in striving to shut others out"

That means you can't prove it?

]

therefore i can't prove that God cares since there are such lies and typos.

Why would i prove that god exists?
And as you said i am finite and don't even know the meaning of infinite therefore i can't prove it. I don't feel the need of proving it, My God says there will be infinity that means there will be (to me and other Muslims).

I never said God exists because i think, and i never said my God exists because he said me.



show me the evidence.

They probably learned it from the Israelites or from someone else. There's a story in Genesis that refers that a man's seed, his sperm, is what makes a woman pregnant.

And the Prophet Isiah talks about the formation of a child in the womb (him in particular). So your claim....yeah it's been known for quite some time, and before Islam even existed.

I take it you are establishing the concept of the the cosmological argument. The notion that something cannot come from absolute nothing, but rather, an outside force.
But the Law of Conservation of Matter states clearly that matter cannot be created or destroyed; just reassembled. But I suppose that the concept of God is beyond the rules of science conveniently. rolleyes

But is it merely the ability to rationalize as human beings that set us apart from animals? How does the ability to think and rationalize say "I have a soul!" It has just given humans the upper hand through a series of evolutions.
And to "think, therefore I am", you would have to say based on that logic that you are only an "am" if you were awake. Asleep, you are entering the unconscious, and Descartes was primarily concerned with the conscious. So for 18 hours a day, roughly, you are "am" because you can think, and when you're asleep, you do not fulfill these requirements. Technically that would mean that you only exist during the day. But then there are also things that a human being can do that does not require thought as well.
Then you have to get to the point of, do I actually exist or am I part of someone's fantasy?
Not necessarily.
Cold is the absence of heat
Dark is the absence of light
You're talking about what would "theoretically" complement each other. Male and female relationships are only typical because they are the most prominant and widely accepted relationship in the world. Males can have males and females can have females.
You're putting pairs with things that you are familiar in your culture that is not necessarily the same thing with other people of other cultures.
You consider dark the polar opposite of light simply because YOU cannot see, and very few humans can. But there's still light, you just lack the ability to sense it. That's why some creatures can see in the dark while others cannot. Same with heat, and cold. Heat is created by atoms vibrating vigorously against the other and that energy is expelled in a form we know as heat. The less the atoms move and bounce around, the cooler the temperature is.

Now, back to the philosophical side. Even if this was "evidence" of God's existence, all it shows that there is a possibility of a higher being existing. It doesn't state that this supposed super power is benevolent and loving and all that stuff that religions tend to believe in when they call out for a God.

hmm pretty nice discussion going on here... so do both of yall believe in God or no?