|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:28 am
 |
|
|
 |
Stoic Socialist Okay, maybe it'd work, but please, tell me...
Why would you risk killing you, your group, and buring down your building when:
You could have an AKM, 400 rounds of ammunition, and a 6 magazine chest rig for the same weight?
I understand the "cost-effectiveness".
Okay, I honestly don't.
Why are you worrying about cost-effectiveness, even if it's not true, when you could spend them same amount of time and find a firearm?
but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find.
guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type)
so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher.
flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire.
again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies
in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 10:46 am
|
|
|
|
exploding-waffles but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find. guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type) so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher. flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire. again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce.
Well, I guess I'd just like something usefull, and able to be used to take game... and be used anywhere I want. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 4:35 pm
|
|
|
|
Stoic Socialist exploding-waffles but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find. guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type) so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher. flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire. again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 8:39 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Stoic Socialist exploding-waffles but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find. guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type) so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher. flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire. again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce. The only use I really see for a flamethrower is if the zombie requires full immolation in order to stop it from harming you. Otherwise, the cons outweigh the pros.
let us not forget that some headshots will not destroy the brain, while fire is garunteed to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:02 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 10:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 8:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2008 9:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:45 pm
|
|
|
|
WARNING:
DO NOT, under any circumstances, use fire on a member of the undead horde.
While having a zombie chase you, trying to devour your head, the only worse thing is...
When a zombie DOESN'T DIE, IS ON FIRE, AND IS TRYING TO DEVOUR YOUR HEAD.
Neither Shock, nor awe effects zombies.
Trauma is laughable to a horde.
Setting them on fire will kill them...EVENTUALLY (possibly 30- 60 mins)
Their skin and blood no longer matters.
UNTIL the fire reaches either their muscles enough to disable all of their limbs, reaches the brain, or spine, THEY WILL NOT DIE.
That is all...have a nice day biggrin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:54 pm
|
|
|
|
exploding-waffles Fresnel Stoic Socialist exploding-waffles but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find. guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type) so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher. flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire. again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce. The only use I really see for a flamethrower is if the zombie requires full immolation in order to stop it from harming you. Otherwise, the cons outweigh the pros. let us not forget that some headshots will not destroy the brain, while fire is garunteed to.
What guarantee?
Fire has to burn through eerything else first, then the skin, and skull...
If it reaches that point, it has to be fueled. Then maybe reach the brain. neutral
Also, with the whole 'super soaker' s**t, what are you going to use for fuel?
Gas, petrol, carosine and I'm sure many other resources will be taken by looters, or people trying to flee from the horde.
And things like WD40 would be hard to find and eve more dangerous to extract liquid from gonk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:52 pm
|
|
|
|
Battlefield Reaper exploding-waffles Fresnel Stoic Socialist exploding-waffles but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find. guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type) so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher. flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire. again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce. The only use I really see for a flamethrower is if the zombie requires full immolation in order to stop it from harming you. Otherwise, the cons outweigh the pros. let us not forget that some headshots will not destroy the brain, while fire is garunteed to.
Fire has to burn through eerything else first, then the skin, and skull...
If it reaches that point, it has to be fueled. Then maybe reach the brain. neutral
Also, with the whole 'super soaker' s**t, what are you going to use for fuel?
Gas, petrol, carosine and I'm sure many other resources will be taken by looters, or people trying to flee from the horde.
And things like WD40 would be hard to find and eve more dangerous to extract liquid from gonk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:45 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Battlefield Reaper exploding-waffles Fresnel Stoic Socialist exploding-waffles but that works under the assumption that there will be firearms to find. guns WILL be the first things to be looted/bought in a class 3 or 4 outbreak (were all gonna die type) so getting one will be much, much harder than finding a fire extinguisher. flames also do not require a headshot to be lethal, can stay burning for a few seconds, and have a large area of fire. again flamethrowers were never meant to be used nearby important structures or buildings, what they should be used for dispatching is extremely large, fairly closely grouped zombies in unimportant areas when ammo, guns, or trained soldiers are scarce. The only use I really see for a flamethrower is if the zombie requires full immolation in order to stop it from harming you. Otherwise, the cons outweigh the pros. let us not forget that some headshots will not destroy the brain, while fire is garunteed to.
Fire has to burn through eerything else first, then the skin, and skull...
If it reaches that point, it has to be fueled. Then maybe reach the brain. neutral
Also, with the whole 'super soaker' s**t, what are you going to use for fuel?
Gas, petrol, carosine and I'm sure many other resources will be taken by looters, or people trying to flee from the horde.
And things like WD40 would be hard to find and eve more dangerous to extract liquid from gonk Paint thinner, methanol, everclear... they'll all do fine.
I think that if something like that would happen, people would rather drink the everclear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:41 pm
|
|
|
|
OberFeldwebel Fresnel Battlefield Reaper exploding-waffles Fresnel The only use I really see for a flamethrower is if the zombie requires full immolation in order to stop it from harming you. Otherwise, the cons outweigh the pros. let us not forget that some headshots will not destroy the brain, while fire is garunteed to.
Fire has to burn through eerything else first, then the skin, and skull...
If it reaches that point, it has to be fueled. Then maybe reach the brain. neutral
Also, with the whole 'super soaker' s**t, what are you going to use for fuel?
Gas, petrol, carosine and I'm sure many other resources will be taken by looters, or people trying to flee from the horde.
And things like WD40 would be hard to find and eve more dangerous to extract liquid from gonk Paint thinner, methanol, everclear... they'll all do fine. I think that if something like that would happen, people would rather drink the everclear. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:43 pm
|
|
|
|
Battlefield Reaper WARNING:DO NOT, under any circumstances, use fire on a member of the undead horde.
While having a zombie chase you, trying to devour your head, the only worse thing is...
When a zombie DOESN'T DIE, IS ON FIRE, AND IS TRYING TO DEVOUR YOUR HEAD.
Neither Shock, nor awe effects zombies.
Trauma is laughable to a horde.
Setting them on fire will kill them...EVENTUALLY (possibly 30- 60 mins)
Their skin and blood no longer matters.
UNTIL the fire reaches either their muscles enough to disable all of their limbs, reaches the brain, or spine, THEY WILL NOT DIE.
That is all...have a nice day biggrin
right, but i dont see how a burning zombie is more dangerous than a normal one, as if your infected at all your pretty much dead.
also do you really think it would take 30 minutes to affect a zombie to the point of incapacitating it?
also, zombies are slow, why not simply ignite a zombie, flee, and wait?
burn zombies, find next group, ignite until there are no more zombies, wait 30 minutes/clean up the last batch with guns. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
