|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 11:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:33 pm
|
|
|
|
Haydar the Truthful Ratri_Cat No it isn't. It doesn't matter whether the victim is female, male, young, or older. It doesn't matter the racial background, it doesn't matter the religion. LUST HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RAPE.
I demand that you provide adequate proof that lust is a major part of rape.
Studies have shown again and again it is PURELY DOMINANCE.
http://www.statenews.com/index.php/article/2005/10/clothes_contribute_toBut I agree that many circumstances show dominance such as Warfare tactics. ÉN verekszik részére Isten , országom és családom
Dude, I asked for adequate proof. You got an opinion of a male sophomore zoology student for a newspaper/online source. I wanted a STUDY. TRIALS. Not someone's opinion.
Zaaki, with comments like that, you deserve to have your balls cut off. Rape is purely dominance, not clothing wise. If that was the case, no Hijab-wearing woman or Burqa wearing woman would ever get raped. But you know what?! They do! And in Muslim countries!!!! By Muslim MEN!!! Because male morons like to dominate women, regardless of what they are wearing.
...kit ugye verekszik részére?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:48 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:42 pm
|
|
|
|
Zaaki It whill thake too long time to prove!
No, Zaaki, Ratri's right. Rape has been proven to be a dominance thing.
Zaaki But if u look at a woman without any hair, and then look at her with hair, u whill see a diffrence!
...What? Are you trying to say that the girl with hair showing is more attractive? That may be true, but it does not lead to rape. I live in America, and we have attractive girls who can walk around in bikinis and not be raped. So whether you show hair has nothing to do with it.
Zaaki And those people are just going to the wrong path 3nodding And u do not judge what i deserve!
I'll admit that Ratri was a little harsh there... but I can't say that I disagree with her. sweatdrop
Zaaki And yes the raper is gonna get gunha, i dunno how much... But also the rapped!!
No. The victim should not be punished.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:24 am
|
|
|
|
tassan whats the point of proving whether rape is lust or dominance? and zaaki i guess you are wrong! you are not even using common sense! the one who rapes gets the punishment! there comes not mistake of the one who gets raped! that's an other perspective of that she is wearing hijab or not! in Pakistan there are woman who get raped even after wearing hijab - XD peace out There acturally comes a li'l mistake if the rapped ain't covered! If the rapped is getting gunha, i don't know razz
And i wont say that womens with hijab can't get raped! Cause perverts mostly look at the a**, right? They dun care about a pretty face?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:40 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:38 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 1:04 pm
|
|
|
|
Zaaki The raper proberly made the biggest fault! But the raped, did not wear cloth! Soo it's pretty much both's fault! Incorrect. Quit repeating male chauvinistic s**t and move on to the 21st century.
Zaaki And if the woman did wear clothings, then it was not her fault! Again, get your head into the 21st century where is is known and scientifically proven that this not the case.
Zaaki But i'm saying that in Amarica it's kinda always concindered as normal sex! And that's why they say that it is not a rape! No it is not. Sex is different than rape. Premarital sex is not forced sex.
BIG DIFFERENCE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|