|
|
IGN gave it 3.9... |
Screw IGN, their reviews are usually un-trustworthy. |
|
53% |
[ 8 ] |
Oh dear, Sonic and the Black Knight must suck then. :/ |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
Hmm... I'll still get it anyway... |
|
6% |
[ 1 ] |
Oh well, this game is gonna be great! |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
I'd be crazy to get this peice of crap! >:[ |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
|
Total Votes : 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:50 pm
|
|
|
|
Waynebrizzle Meta_Fish KyuubiNaruto4 Its amazing it gets: 8.5 Presentation 8.5 Graphics 7.5 Sound 3.0 Gameplay 3.0 Lasting Appeal Yet it gets a 3.9 for overall? Haven't even played the game, and most likely won't, but doesn't that score just sound biased to you? Just so you know IGN doesn't do an average. The graphics, sound and overall presentation don't make a game a good game. The gameplay and lasting appeal would have to be the most important things on my list. yeah besides averaging numbers is too complicated for IGN staff anyway It's not being lazy. They've stated many times that that number is not an average. The guys who work there have also said on podcasts and s**t that they hate having to put a number on games, but they pick that number based on how good they think the game is altogether.
I don't get how everyone is so shocked that it got a bad score. The game looks like s**t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:54 pm
|
|
|
|
Teh AK Waynebrizzle Meta_Fish KyuubiNaruto4 Its amazing it gets: 8.5 Presentation 8.5 Graphics 7.5 Sound 3.0 Gameplay 3.0 Lasting Appeal Yet it gets a 3.9 for overall? Haven't even played the game, and most likely won't, but doesn't that score just sound biased to you? Just so you know IGN doesn't do an average. The graphics, sound and overall presentation don't make a game a good game. The gameplay and lasting appeal would have to be the most important things on my list. yeah besides averaging numbers is too complicated for IGN staff anyway It's not being lazy. They've stated many times that that number is not an average. The guys who work there have also said on podcasts and s**t that they hate having to put a number on games, but they pick that number based on how good they think the game is altogether. I don't get how everyone is so shocked that it got a bad score. The game looks like s**t.
So.. is there a point to having the criteria then, if it's not going to even mirror the final score?
I don't like the looks of the game either, but I've seen them give better scores to worse s**t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:17 pm
|
|
|
|
Meta_Fish To add to the argument currently going-on, I like what Gamespot does, with their whole "tilt" section of reviews. KyuubiNaruto4 Have you played Bleach Shattered Blade? They gave a 6.0 for both Gameplay and Lasting Appeal yet after playing it for three hours, not straight wrist started to hurt after an hour, I didn't want to play it again. Bottom line IGN reviews just plain suck. Or maybe everyone has their own opinions which they are entitled to? Waynebrizzle yeah besides averaging numbers is too complicated for IGN staff anyway "graphics are old school and we wouldn't have them any other way graphics 3.0/10"
derp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:50 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 10:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:19 am
|
|
|
|
Super Cheesio The Rawk Hawk Looks nice... I have a question: What is the best 3d Sonic Game you played? I wanna know 3nodding Half of Sonic Unleashed. If that doesn't count: Sonic Adventure 2. @Dragn: YES! blaugh I was starting to think that maybe this might turn out to be one of the 'hog's worst games. They brought back speeeeed!!! xd Still don't like the complete lack of platforming though... that's why I only give it a 7. Still. It's fun. And (apparently) Shadow, Knuckles, and Blaze are playable in adventure mode. I haven't unlocked them yet though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 11:53 am
|
|
|
|
dragn99 Super Cheesio The Rawk Hawk Looks nice... I have a question: What is the best 3d Sonic Game you played? I wanna know 3nodding Half of Sonic Unleashed. If that doesn't count: Sonic Adventure 2. @Dragn: YES! blaugh I was starting to think that maybe this might turn out to be one of the 'hog's worst games. They brought back speeeeed!!! xd Still don't like the complete lack of platforming though... that's why I only give it a 7. Still. It's fun. And (apparently) Shadow, Knuckles, and Blaze are playable in adventure mode. I haven't unlocked them yet though... So, once you beat King Arthur a second time what happens after that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 12:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:52 pm
|
|
|
|
Super Cheesio dragn99 Super Cheesio The Rawk Hawk Looks nice... I have a question: What is the best 3d Sonic Game you played? I wanna know 3nodding Half of Sonic Unleashed. If that doesn't count: Sonic Adventure 2. @Dragn: YES! blaugh I was starting to think that maybe this might turn out to be one of the 'hog's worst games. They brought back speeeeed!!! xd Still don't like the complete lack of platforming though... that's why I only give it a 7. Still. It's fun. And (apparently) Shadow, Knuckles, and Blaze are playable in adventure mode. I haven't unlocked them yet though... So, once you beat King Arthur a second time what happens after that? Well, there's the final boss (not telling), and you go "Super" (you've all seen the picture. It's actually pretty epic in gameplay), and... I haven't beaten that boss yet.. But yes, Shadow, Knuckles, and Blaze are all playable in adventure now. But not in all the stages. So, they're limited, but I can play as them. Knuckles can glide!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|