|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2009 6:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 10, 2009 2:49 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 4:03 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel black_wing_angel Fresnel black_wing_angel Fresnel Why not? I personally don't think gay marriage should be legalized. I don't think STRAIGHT marriage should be legalized. I don't think 'marriage' and 'legal' should be used in the same sentence. Marriage is a purely religious construct, and its very existence in our lawbooks is an affront to the separation of church and state. I'm all for a 'civil union' with all the same legal rights as marriage, but I'm still miffed that being married gives you special privileges. It should be noted, however, that by 'not legalized' I don't mean 'illegalized', I mean 'unregulated'. Laissez faire. Marry whoever or whatever you want, so long as the Pope is fine with it. Or, y'know, whoever runs your religion. And slightly more on-topic, there's no way we're going to see legalized gay marriage in this state. AZ is possibly the most conservative state without 'exas' in its name. Well, I SORTA agree, sorta disagree. Just because the concept of marriage might be religious born, doesn't mean it shouldn't have a "legal" counterpart. Legal conjoinment garners legal benefits that should not be removed from practice, in my opinion. I just think they need to open the boundaries of who and what you can marry. I figure, as long as the person/creature/whatever can legally consent to marriage, then congratulations, and I pray your children (if you have any) aren't as ugly as you are.* * (that comment is not aimed at anyone in particular, it's just me being a d**k, in the name of humor) You may have a point. A civil union isn't a bad thing (though these days it's pretty useless), but the gays who demand MARRIAGE and nothing short will do need to be c**k-slapped, and not in an enjoyable way. Well, they're just looking for COMPLETE equality. If they can have the same thing, same legal benefits, and everything......but they can't call it the same thing, then that's still discrimination, because it's not 100% equality. I've seen someone bitched out for supporting a 'civil union' with all of the same legal rights as marriage. That's all the government can GIVE you. But no, because it's not CALLED marriage, it's NOT marriage. Rose by any other name, ******** class="clear">
is a civil union exactly the same as a marriage (sans religious component) though?
i was given to believe that marriage makes your spouse your next of kin and civil union does not. so it makes a big difference.
example: your same sex partner of twenty years, who you have lived with as if you were married, is in an accident and dying in hospital. their relatives do not approve of homosexuality and your partner was excommunicated 20 years ago. the hospital will call them to notify them. they may or may not come and visit. if you call the hospital (who will not notify you as you are no relation) you will not be able to find out any information nor will you be allowed to visit as you are not next of kin.
and, fresnel, marriage is not and never has been a purely religious construct. it has only recently been about romance and love, from the beginning it was a legal contract designed to engineer the offspring patterns and wealth mergers of families...it was born from religion yes but at a time when religion was the only law.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 8:45 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 3:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 4:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 4:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 7:27 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel black_wing_angel Fresnel black_wing_angel Fresnel Why not? I personally don't think gay marriage should be legalized. I don't think STRAIGHT marriage should be legalized. I don't think 'marriage' and 'legal' should be used in the same sentence. Marriage is a purely religious construct, and its very existence in our lawbooks is an affront to the separation of church and state. I'm all for a 'civil union' with all the same legal rights as marriage, but I'm still miffed that being married gives you special privileges. It should be noted, however, that by 'not legalized' I don't mean 'illegalized', I mean 'unregulated'. Laissez faire. Marry whoever or whatever you want, so long as the Pope is fine with it. Or, y'know, whoever runs your religion. And slightly more on-topic, there's no way we're going to see legalized gay marriage in this state. AZ is possibly the most conservative state without 'exas' in its name. Well, I SORTA agree, sorta disagree. Just because the concept of marriage might be religious born, doesn't mean it shouldn't have a "legal" counterpart. Legal conjoinment garners legal benefits that should not be removed from practice, in my opinion. I just think they need to open the boundaries of who and what you can marry. I figure, as long as the person/creature/whatever can legally consent to marriage, then congratulations, and I pray your children (if you have any) aren't as ugly as you are.* * (that comment is not aimed at anyone in particular, it's just me being a d**k, in the name of humor) You may have a point. A civil union isn't a bad thing (though these days it's pretty useless), but the gays who demand MARRIAGE and nothing short will do need to be c**k-slapped, and not in an enjoyable way. Well, they're just looking for COMPLETE equality. If they can have the same thing, same legal benefits, and everything......but they can't call it the same thing, then that's still discrimination, because it's not 100% equality. I've seen someone bitched out for supporting a 'civil union' with all of the same legal rights as marriage. That's all the government can GIVE you. But no, because it's not CALLED marriage, it's NOT marriage. Rose by any other name, ******** class="clear">
What's in a name? Why is it SOOOOOOOOO important that it not be called a "marriage"? If it's the exact same thing, then why is the term still off limits?
As you said, a rose by any other name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 12:10 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 7:47 am
|
|
|
|
magmayoshi black_wing_angel As you said, a rose by any other name. Is a bear and if we gave everyone bears for gifts we wouldn't have to worry about things like marriage. So the best solution for the world: mass breeding of roses of other names AKA bears. People will give out these neo-roses as gifts, ending all relationships ever due to mauling, massive blood loss and eventually a horrendous death.
A little extreme, there, magma...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 9:58 am
|
|
|
|
magmayoshi black_wing_angel As you said, a rose by any other name. Is a bear and if we gave everyone bears for gifts we wouldn't have to worry about things like marriage. So the best solution for the world: mass breeding of roses of other names AKA bears. People will give out these neo-roses as gifts, ending all relationships ever due to mauling, massive blood loss and eventually a horrendous death.
I like this guy, he knows where the future is going. XP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 1:29 pm
|
|
|
|
mistercombine magmayoshi black_wing_angel As you said, a rose by any other name. Is a bear and if we gave everyone bears for gifts we wouldn't have to worry about things like marriage. So the best solution for the world: mass breeding of roses of other names AKA bears. People will give out these neo-roses as gifts, ending all relationships ever due to mauling, massive blood loss and eventually a horrendous death. I like this guy, he knows where the future is going. XP Future? We've been giving girls bears as presents for YEARS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:25 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel mistercombine magmayoshi black_wing_angel As you said, a rose by any other name. Is a bear and if we gave everyone bears for gifts we wouldn't have to worry about things like marriage. So the best solution for the world: mass breeding of roses of other names AKA bears. People will give out these neo-roses as gifts, ending all relationships ever due to mauling, massive blood loss and eventually a horrendous death. I like this guy, he knows where the future is going. XP Future? We've been giving girls bears as presents for YEARS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:53 pm
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Fresnel mistercombine magmayoshi black_wing_angel As you said, a rose by any other name. Is a bear and if we gave everyone bears for gifts we wouldn't have to worry about things like marriage. So the best solution for the world: mass breeding of roses of other names AKA bears. People will give out these neo-roses as gifts, ending all relationships ever due to mauling, massive blood loss and eventually a horrendous death. I like this guy, he knows where the future is going. XP Future? We've been giving girls bears as presents for YEARS.
Not really or does Fresnel not know the difference between a "teddy_bear" and a bear?
And no Wing it's never too extreme, I often tone down my responses. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 7:33 pm
|
|
|
|
magmayoshi black_wing_angel Fresnel mistercombine magmayoshi black_wing_angel As you said, a rose by any other name. Is a bear and if we gave everyone bears for gifts we wouldn't have to worry about things like marriage. So the best solution for the world: mass breeding of roses of other names AKA bears. People will give out these neo-roses as gifts, ending all relationships ever due to mauling, massive blood loss and eventually a horrendous death. I like this guy, he knows where the future is going. XP Future? We've been giving girls bears as presents for YEARS. Not really or does Fresnel not know the difference between a "teddy_bear" and a bear? And no Wing it's never too extreme, I often tone down my responses. 3nodding I do.
That guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|