|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:19 pm
|
|
|
|
war_junky 91 MLempire14 Orkronos Well we obviously have alot less to worry about. For one were too damn far away, but.... see Good korea is right next to them along with our bases and troops they arent in too much of a hurry to be turned to radioactive dust. You have to remember, though, we "lost" the Korean War. The "War" is still going, there's just the same cease-fire agreement in action from the 1960s. We would have lost, partly because we'd never find them. They have caves and s**t all over their country which could withstand ANY nuclear strike. We would only be able to take out a few of them b******s before they went underground. Or is that Vietnam? I can't distinguish... That was Vietnam. They had the tunnels and such. In Korea modern borders are where they are because China stepped in at the last second to save North Korea and pushed us back to where the DMZ is now.
Darn confusing wars. But you see my point, yes? They are a hardy people and have the same capabilites as Vietnam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:05 am
|
|
|
|
war_junky 91 MLempire14 Orkronos Well we obviously have alot less to worry about. For one were too damn far away, but.... see Good korea is right next to them along with our bases and troops they arent in too much of a hurry to be turned to radioactive dust. You have to remember, though, we "lost" the Korean War. The "War" is still going, there's just the same cease-fire agreement in action from the 1960s. We would have lost, partly because we'd never find them. They have caves and s**t all over their country which could withstand ANY nuclear strike. We would only be able to take out a few of them b******s before they went underground. Or is that Vietnam? I can't distinguish... That was Vietnam. They had the tunnels and such. In Korea modern borders are where they are because China stepped in at the last second to save North Korea and pushed us back to where the DMZ is now. "Where the DMZ is now". Funny phrase. Where the DMZ is now is where the DMZ WAS before the war. We gained NOTHING, and lost so many thousands of lives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 6:19 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel war_junky 91 MLempire14 Orkronos Well we obviously have alot less to worry about. For one were too damn far away, but.... see Good korea is right next to them along with our bases and troops they arent in too much of a hurry to be turned to radioactive dust. You have to remember, though, we "lost" the Korean War. The "War" is still going, there's just the same cease-fire agreement in action from the 1960s. We would have lost, partly because we'd never find them. They have caves and s**t all over their country which could withstand ANY nuclear strike. We would only be able to take out a few of them b******s before they went underground. Or is that Vietnam? I can't distinguish... That was Vietnam. They had the tunnels and such. In Korea modern borders are where they are because China stepped in at the last second to save North Korea and pushed us back to where the DMZ is now. "Where the DMZ is now". Funny phrase. Where the DMZ is now is where the DMZ WAS before the war. We gained NOTHING, and lost so many thousands of lives.
Well, if at all counts we killed some Commies and saved some people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 11:52 am
|
|
|
|
OberFeldwebel Fresnel war_junky 91 MLempire14 Orkronos Well we obviously have alot less to worry about. For one were too damn far away, but.... see Good korea is right next to them along with our bases and troops they arent in too much of a hurry to be turned to radioactive dust. You have to remember, though, we "lost" the Korean War. The "War" is still going, there's just the same cease-fire agreement in action from the 1960s. We would have lost, partly because we'd never find them. They have caves and s**t all over their country which could withstand ANY nuclear strike. We would only be able to take out a few of them b******s before they went underground. Or is that Vietnam? I can't distinguish... That was Vietnam. They had the tunnels and such. In Korea modern borders are where they are because China stepped in at the last second to save North Korea and pushed us back to where the DMZ is now. "Where the DMZ is now". Funny phrase. Where the DMZ is now is where the DMZ WAS before the war. We gained NOTHING, and lost so many thousands of lives. Well, if at all counts we killed some Commies and saved some people. And really, what did the commies ever do? Besides being different, why are they BAD? I don't like their system of government, but that's hardly a reason for genocide.
And who exactly did we save that wasn't put in danger by us in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 9:19 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel war_junky 91 MLempire14 Orkronos Well we obviously have alot less to worry about. For one were too damn far away, but.... see Good korea is right next to them along with our bases and troops they arent in too much of a hurry to be turned to radioactive dust. You have to remember, though, we "lost" the Korean War. The "War" is still going, there's just the same cease-fire agreement in action from the 1960s. We would have lost, partly because we'd never find them. They have caves and s**t all over their country which could withstand ANY nuclear strike. We would only be able to take out a few of them b******s before they went underground. Or is that Vietnam? I can't distinguish... That was Vietnam. They had the tunnels and such. In Korea modern borders are where they are because China stepped in at the last second to save North Korea and pushed us back to where the DMZ is now. "Where the DMZ is now". Funny phrase. Where the DMZ is now is where the DMZ WAS before the war. We gained NOTHING, and lost so many thousands of lives. Actually the DMZ change slightly, before the war the bondary was the 38th parallel. After the war the south lost land to the west and gained to the east so the bondary got kind of tilted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:42 pm
|
|
|
|
war_junky 91 Fresnel war_junky 91 MLempire14 Orkronos Well we obviously have alot less to worry about. For one were too damn far away, but.... see Good korea is right next to them along with our bases and troops they arent in too much of a hurry to be turned to radioactive dust. You have to remember, though, we "lost" the Korean War. The "War" is still going, there's just the same cease-fire agreement in action from the 1960s. We would have lost, partly because we'd never find them. They have caves and s**t all over their country which could withstand ANY nuclear strike. We would only be able to take out a few of them b******s before they went underground. Or is that Vietnam? I can't distinguish... That was Vietnam. They had the tunnels and such. In Korea modern borders are where they are because China stepped in at the last second to save North Korea and pushed us back to where the DMZ is now. "Where the DMZ is now". Funny phrase. Where the DMZ is now is where the DMZ WAS before the war. We gained NOTHING, and lost so many thousands of lives. Actually the DMZ change slightly, before the war the bondary was the 38th parallel. After the war the south lost land to the west and gained to the east so the bondary got kind of tilted. Gained and lost land is more or less exactly equal though, so really there was no change at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:30 pm
|
|
|
|
OberFeldwebel It'd have to be a good desk. And made from lead too. I saw some video of some parade over in North Korea. They had UAZs and Zil 157s (I think Zils) vehicles in their parade. ... do they have anything that's not Russian made? alot of communist country has Russian made weapons because Russia worked with them before and supplied them in the Russian arsenal, china heavily design their air force and navy off of Russian tech but unlike china Korea is outdated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|