|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:25 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
MortSanglant GilAskan There's nothing wrong with labels so long as they're used correctly. Language in itself is just a series of labels; labelling a sound to a particular idea or object. "Apple" is a label we give to a certain fruit. "Fruit" is a label we give to a classification of plant. "Plant" is a label we give to organisms which draw energy from the sun. Et' cetera. Labels are powerful and important. Without labels, our society could not function socially. Without labels, (musically in this example) Eminem wouldn't be rap and Led Zepplin wouldn't be rock; they'd be the same thing, "music". Social labels (such as goth) are important, and there's nothing wrong with using them if they're used correctly. Dictionary.com goth n. 1. A style of rock music that often evokes bleak, lugubrious imagery. 2. A performer or follower of this style of music. If I'm a follower of goth-rock, calling me a goth IS NOT wrong. To conclude (in summary), labels are not wrong. Labels are only wrong when used incorrectly. Well put, Mr. Gil.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 2:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:46 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
GilAskan There's nothing wrong with labels so long as they're used correctly. Language in itself is just a series of labels; labelling a sound to a particular idea or object. "Apple" is a label we give to a certain fruit. "Fruit" is a label we give to a classification of plant. "Plant" is a label we give to organisms which draw energy from the sun. Et' cetera. Labels are powerful and important. Without labels, our society could not function socially. Without labels, (musically in this example) Eminem wouldn't be rap and Led Zepplin wouldn't be rock; they'd be the same thing, "music". Social labels (such as goth) are important, and there's nothing wrong with using them if they're used correctly. Dictionary.com goth n. 1. A style of rock music that often evokes bleak, lugubrious imagery. 2. A performer or follower of this style of music. If I'm a follower of goth-rock, calling me a goth IS NOT wrong. To conclude (in summary), labels are not wrong. Labels are only wrong when used incorrectly.
I agree. Colors are also only labels we use for light of certain wavelengths. And If I'm called a goth, I don't mind. But If I'm called an emo I DO mind. Well, I don't mind so much, I don't get personnally offended, but I do wish people wouldn't confuse goth and emo. sad
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 3:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|