|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:34 am
|
|
|
|
Chaton Atomique Please, sweetie! For someone who thinks a brutal crime like rape is a fun thing to make light of you go all pretty defensive at minor promises of violence? rolleyes
And I do like to share my Jacky, but with those that treat him right. wink heart
@Jacky: Senor Snugglebutts! I haven't seen him in a while! *hugs both of you!*
stare ya no duh I'm gonna be defensive that someone else is telling me what to do who has no real reason to. it wasn't the promise of violence, it's the reason for it that pisses me off. And using the nature of rape to justify your overreaction? that's shameful.
it was just a game. And he never asked me to stop nor did he portray any distaste other then minor irritant. So saying, you were just trying to protect his feelings is clearly a lie. The most he did was tell me to find a new play thing. But considering he used a picture of kinky teddy bear as an example, can I really take that seriously? So far I'm under the impression that he likes the game just as much as me. It's just a fun cat and mouse.
Of coarse you like to share, as long as they do as you want and say what you want. Sorry it doesn't work that way. If I was doing it in real life then I would agree that you have a valid reason to be so defensive. But considering It's the internet and I have no real interest in your precious Jacky, I'd have to say that was clearly an overreaction.
Don't EVER call me sweety. I don't like you. you ruined my game. you took all the fun out of it. The only reason I come to these static game threads is sos I can have real fun. And since you're clearly going to ruin it for me by saying that we all have to follow your rules or else you take offense. I feel no need to stay.
Excuse me if I like to create my own games, with their own rules that aren't written so the player has to figure out how it works as they play. The consequence of responding wrong in the game is different depending on the game I'm choosing to play. In this case the consequence was that I come up with creative ways to put him in a static, uncomfortable situation. aka I rape him. how does he win? well first he has to realize that it's a game. Then he has to figure out how to make me stop. I use something easy so I'm not depending on the other persons ability to reason. It makes it generic so the game can be played by everyone. In this case it was simply him saying stop. it's fun for both me and the person playing because you never know what response you're gonna get.(very entertaining) It's more spontaneous then the static games.
Yes rape is a serious offense. but I'm not actually raping him am I? nor have I used it in anything but a fun context. I wouldn't say I'm mocking rape victims with it. You trying to use it to justify your own personal position that has nothing to do with it offends me. We joke about killing people. why should rape be different? As long as your not mocking their pain or making fun of the seriousness of concept. There is nothing to take offense to. hell, I'm a rape victim and I don't take offense to it.
I'm outta here. This pissing contest is over. Since it's become obvious that I'm dealing with an overly emotional flake who can't understand the concept of a game. evil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 6:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|