|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 8:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 9:47 pm
|
|
|
|
Tinuvial I have to speak up on behalf of "yarn snobs" because it sounds like you guys would consider me one. O.o It's true that I avoid yarns with high acrylic content - not because they're cheap. I avoid them because acrylic makes my hands feel sweaty when I work with it (and when I wear the garment later). Also, I never make anything for babies in yarns with high acrylic content because it's not flame retardant. I've found that it's nicer (and potentially safer) to knit with non-acrylic. I never really considered myself a yarn snob, but maybe this means that I am. redface Yarn snobs, at least in my opinion, are the ones who look down on a knitter because they use the cheaper yarn. I prefer natural fibers when i can get them. I'm a sucker for cottons and alpaca and silk and all those yummy natural fibers, but at the prices you can buy them at... well... i get like $14 a week, which i tend to spend on things like food when i go out or (at the moment) birthday presents for my girlfriend. I don't have any objection to people not working with them, but don't look at me like i'm the scum of the earth when i need a $2.19 skein of yarn that can make a whole scarf, and a non-natural fiber falls in that category.
Lee: Whats annoying is when they say "Doesn't that take a long time?" and you go to say "Yes, but i enjoy the knitting more then the scarf" and the decide to answer their own question by saying "Of course it does! I don't know why you'd spend all that time working on a scarf when you could buy one for $15..." and you hold up your yarn and say "$2.19" and they say "It can't feel good then." and you dare them to touch it, and they just walk away. sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:39 am
|
|
|
|
sonicrunner001 Tinuvial Also, I never make anything for babies in yarns with high acrylic content because it's not flame retardant. : Does anybody have a cool knit hat pattern they would like to share. (that they can share)
I like the Worms in Grass. The pattern is crochet, but could probably be adapted very easily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 6:43 am
|
|
|
|
AriRashkae sonicrunner001 Tinuvial Also, I never make anything for babies in yarns with high acrylic content because it's not flame retardant. : Does anybody have a cool knit hat pattern they would like to share. (that they can share) I like the Worms in Grass. The pattern is crochet, but could probably be adapted very easily.
Mmm, good pattern smile
Here is a small motherload from knitty: http://knitty.com/archiveHEADS.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:17 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 12:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 8:16 pm
|
|
|
|
1. If I am copying out a chart (which I do for all my written patterns, it's easier for me) or counting stitches, attempting to engage me in conversation. Especially with lace patterns.
2. Patterns where no yardage requirements are given, or weight (ounces) is given, but not weight (of yarn).
3. Scratchy yarns made from non-scratchy fibers. I don't understand it. I recycled a $5 50/50 angora/lambswool sweater, and it's too prickly to use as a scarf. It makes me sad.
4. People who see you every day, working on the same project, who ask you every day what you're making. It's the same thing as yesterday. Seriously.
5. Unintended color pooling in variegated yarn.
6. Novelty yarn.
7. People who assume that just because you knit, you will knit them something/fix their knitted item.
8. People who assume you knit only because you have nothing better to do.
9. People who assume that just because you knit, you cannot be a feminist.
10. People who assume that just because you are female and knitting, you are pregnant. (Seriously, what the hell?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 4:11 pm
|
|
|
|
YourAzureGoddess Tinuvial I have to speak up on behalf of "yarn snobs" because it sounds like you guys would consider me one. O.o It's true that I avoid yarns with high acrylic content - not because they're cheap. I avoid them because acrylic makes my hands feel sweaty when I work with it (and when I wear the garment later). Also, I never make anything for babies in yarns with high acrylic content because it's not flame retardant. I've found that it's nicer (and potentially safer) to knit with non-acrylic. I never really considered myself a yarn snob, but maybe this means that I am. redface I don't really think yarn snobbery can be considered a war of natural vs. synthetic. I rarely use acrylic anymore either. That's not because I have any hate against Red Heart Super Saver or Caron Super Soft... it's because I love wool. Simple good plain wool is my fav. I think yarn snobbery is luxury fiber vs. simple fiber. When you start going "Oh my god, you're using plain old fisherman's wool (Or super soft or what have you) Why aren't you using this hand painted, hand dyed, luxury spun silk alpaca mix?" that's yarn snobbery (Not that I would mind a silk alpaca mix.... Mmm... that would be yummy. I just don't believe *ALL* my yarn purchases have to come from the high end yarn shop. I'm an equal opportunity knitter)
O Goddess, you should learn to SPIN! It's the bestest hobby ever and puts those handspun, handpainted luxury yarns within budget!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2008 8:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:18 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|