|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:32 am
Mini_Angel_1994 Ok, ok, maybe we shouldn't get christianity or any other religon in this thread. We are just disscussing why Hijab is in the world. I'm trying to understand the hijab from a Christian perspective. As a non-Muslim, I don't see the reason for it and want to see if you can convince me otherwise. I'd like to see a valid reason, but I'm not Mini_Angel_1994 But Hijab is just to state that ( Men, you are not allowed to look at me, and even though you look at me, you can't see anything, so just go back to Allah, and seek for his forgivness ) You might as well blindfold the guy then. I don't see the righteousness in this. Most people don't act on sight, and it doesn't matter what a person is wearing. Mini_Angel_1994 But is it that important to look pretty and do make up and do hair dos and whatever? Is it really important psht. when i did makeup (i don't often because i'm lazy and army regulations make it difficult) i did it for myself. I felt great because I knew I looked good and took care of myself. It didn't matter when I was single, when I was dating or just broken up. I liked looking nice and felt good about myself when I took the time to care for myself. Most of the time I'm taking care of others and not taking care of myself. It was nice for a change. And you're telling me this is bad? Girls that dress to attract guys, i've found end up looking like clowns because they put up so much makeup. xd This i understand. But as in my case, and most other girls I know, we just don't dress up for that effect. Not all girls are the same. stare Mini_Angel_1994 There's more than in life than that. There's a difference in overindulging and taking some time for self-care.
Mini_Angel_1994 Frankly, I'd like to be pretty to myself, there's no need that I should show it for the whole world. So? I don't have a problem with that. What I do have an issue with is your sweeping generalizations of men and women. Mini_Angel_1994 I think the total opposite, girls look more pretty in Hijab. I like myself better in Hijab. Personal preference. I won't hold it against you, nor think less of you for it. Mini_Angel_1994 You may not understand this Ratri, because you haven't experienced what is Allah's love to muslims, and especially those who have lots of faith. It still doesn't justify Allah's command to wear it. Look, I've studied other religions, and even from an academic standpoint, what I read about something as foreign as karma and reincarnation, I understood the reasoning behind it. I understood why Hindus don't eat beef. I understand why some people, like in Buddhism, are vegetarians. There's a reason for it. There's a justification for the command. You haven't given me one singular reason besides it's Allah's command and again, the vague human conception that something bad may happen to you if you don't wear the cloth. Which I do not find sufficient nor an adequate way of justifying the command.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:08 pm
Ratri_Cat Yup, Mini-Angel, you did not convince me one bit. Pheonixia For example, many Prophets were sent to the Jews and the Jews knew what was good for them and what wasn't but the persisted in idolatry. And also.......Christians decided they would ascribe a son to God (who does not need a son since he is perfect). My gawd, what is with you people! We said that Jesus is God incarnate. Not a separate deity. Go check out my conversation with Xero in the other forum about 'forgiveness' if you want a better scope of how the divinity of Jesus affects my Christian beliefs. Already know that. I apologize if it seemed like I was harassing your beliefs. When I was speaking about idolatry specifically though I was referring to the Jews, and not the Christians. And when I referred to the Jews I was thinking along the lines of when Moses left them and the created a golden cow. All I said about the Chrisitans was that they think God has a Son. Quote: stare And I must say, I'm rather offended that you talk about me forcing MY Christian viewpoint, And when I used the term "forcing viewpoint" I was referring to the general Christian viewpoint and not yours (Catholics) specifically. The only reason I made that point is that whatever you were stating she was thinking (aka that man was not sinless, etc.) is actually apart of Christian theology and not Muslim theology. You said: Quote: That God does not acknowledge that while humans are weak, they are made in his image. If humans were inherently evil as you propose, then there would be no hope for the human race. Here even if you were not forcing your beliefs....you made a very bad generalization or conclusion that Muslims don't even believe in. And you made it sound like we DO believe in these concepts when it is not us but Chrisitans that believe this. Quote: but it's quite alright for you to talk down on my faith from your Muslim perspective. Again I apologize. But I have failed to understand what exactly in my post turned you off (eg. how I was harassing your beliefs). I did not even say that Christians were idolaters, I said that Jews practiced this in the past. And when you point to my Muslim perspective........again you are making a generalization. I am not a Sunni or Shia........I am a part of a minority sect that is persecuted by the majority. The majority does not even count my sect as being Muslim. So PLEASE don't generalize my views with theirs. My views are very different from theirs (eg. last Prophet, Jinn, death of Jesus, Promised Messiah already came, that Muslim majority is corrupted, etc.) Quote: I'm trying to understand why the hell you guys bother with the hijab from my point of view. I'm trying to see a justification on my level. And that is good. Quote: That's how you convince somebody that you're correct; you have a particular concept, you can explain it to people who are like you..and then are able to explain it to those who are unlike you. Ummmm....no. Since I'm a minority when people actually find out I'm Ahamdi (they do not believe we are Muslim) the people that are "like me" don't attach that much weight to my responses either. Quote: HOWEVER, when it comes to people who are different, you instead insinuate that we are idolaters, we're flawed in some way different than Muslims. You are not flawed. And again I did not say Christians are idolaters. I was speaking about the Jews. Quote: If you want to convince people that Islam is good and great and your beliefs are right, you don't go flaunting your faith like that. I pretty much lost interest in what you said after this initial reply. I did not flaunt your beliefs........you analyzed incorrectly. I actually know how to debate religion....and I don't need to flaunt your religion to do so because the Bible supports Islam and the Prophet (saw). The only reason I turned to them is because you started saying the OP had a "belief in them". But, you yourself confused the fact And I am aware of the concept of the one God you have so you didn't have to explain it to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:20 pm
Ratri_cat I think the easiest way to explain this to you is:
It is written in the Bible,
“Women must not wear men’s clothing nor a man wear women’s clothing for the Lord your God detests anyone who does this” (Deuteronomy 22:5).
Again, it is written in the Bible, “Favor is deceitful and beauty is vain but a woman that feareth the Lord she shall be praised” (Proverb 31:30).
Again it is written in the Bible, “I also want women to dress modestly, with decency, in propriety, not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or expensive clothes, but with good deeds appropriate for women who profess to worship God” (1 Timothy 2:9-10).
Again, it is written in the Bible, “Any man who prays or prophesizes with something on his head disgraces his head but if any woman who prays or prophesizes with her head unveiled disgraces her head. It is one and the same thing as having her head shaved. For if a woman will not veil herself then she should cut off her hair. But, if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or to be shaved, she should wear a veil. For a man ought not to have his head veiled since he is the image and reflection of God but the woman is a reflection of man” (1 Corinthians 11:4-7).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:38 pm
...If man is the reflecton of God, and woman is the reflection of man, shouldn't they have the same rules about whether to wear things on their heads? ._.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:57 pm
First off, I want to apologize for my sweeping generalizations too. Obviously I misinterpreted what you said and I am glad you clarified.
Pheonixia It is written in the Bible FIRST AND FOREMOST...I am a Catholic. This means I do not take the Bible verbatim...word for word. I was taught that there is a lot more to scripture that meets the eye. And it's not just the text. Muslims may take the Qu'ran literally (or whichever sects do) and other Christian faiths do, but my faith does not. Pheonixia “Women must not wear men’s clothing nor a man wear women’s clothing for the Lord your God detests anyone who does this” (Deuteronomy 22:5). THis is old testament stuff. We acknowledge it but do not follow its rules like Jews do. Study history behind the text and you discover that it is an allusion to Canaanite religions which were believed to contain immoral practices. (which, if you copy-pasted from a bible online, you won't get the footnotes explaining why it said so)
The book of Joshua also advocates genocide, but we don't adhere to that .
Pheonixia Again, it is written in the Bible, “Favor is deceitful and beauty is vain but a woman that feareth the Lord she shall be praised” (Proverb 31:30) So it talks about fearing God. Proverbs, y'know are just sayings. Some have merit to it. It's talking about fearing God and not indulging in material/physical things. Which I have no problem with. But you seem to forget that there is a difference between indulging an not if you're referring to makeup. Pheonixia “I also want women to dress modestly, with decency, in propriety, not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or expensive clothes, but with good deeds appropriate for women who profess to worship God” (1 Timothy 2:9-10). Please do not just cut and paste without reading further. This is describing how people should come to worship God. Not everyday life. I have no problem with this. Pheonixia “Any man who prays or prophesizes with something on his head disgraces his head but if any woman who prays or prophesizes with her head unveiled disgraces her head. It is one and the same thing as having her head shaved. For if a woman will not veil herself then she should cut off her hair. But, if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or to be shaved, she should wear a veil. For a man ought not to have his head veiled since he is the image and reflection of God but the woman is a reflection of man” (1 Corinthians 11:4-7). This is decorum on public worship according to a Jewish interpretation on Dt. 23:15. We're not Jewish. We branched off of it and do it no more. We interpret it as dressing modestly for Mass. Some women do wear a veil to Mass. We figured there were more important things to focus on than what a woman has on her head during the service. I agree.
And again. you left out a part. on 1 Cor 11:16 If anyone wants to be contentious, I say that we have no such custom, nor do any of the churches of God.
The letter to the corinthians was to a group of people well known for their immoral behavior. They are much akin to the jews of the old testament that would waver between idoletry and God.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 5:40 am
Ain't it annoying to reply on soo big posts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:08 am
Zaaki Ain't it annoying to reply on soo big posts? and you say 'you are harassing me!' stare
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:56 am
Zaaki Ain't it annoying to reply on soo big posts? Actually, I got tired from reading, I should be online like 24/7 so I can read everything. Anyways, I'm glad that something came clear. But Pheonixia I didn't read your posts very carefully, I'm sorry but there's too much. Anyways, I gave my personal reference as a true and living proof, that I'm really happy and saticfied with who I am right now. And I gave you the reason, so men don't look at us, and we should cover ourselves for that, you may not understand, Allah knows better Ratri. And I really can't understand, why there are really too many branches in Christianity? And why don't Catholics take Bible as a reference? Isn't it written by Jesus? If not, then who wrote it? If so, why don't you follow it then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 11:26 am
Ratri_Cat First off, I want to apologize for my sweeping generalizations too. Obviously I misinterpreted what you said and I am glad you clarified.
At least we came to an understanding Quote: Pheonixia It is written in the Bible FIRST AND FOREMOST...I am a Catholic. This means I do not take the Bible verbatim...word for word. I was taught that there is a lot more to scripture that meets the eye. And it's not just the text. Muslims may take the Qu'ran literally (or whichever sects do) and other Christian faiths do, but my faith does not. I didn't know that. But, then where do your beliefs come from? If not solely from what is written in the Bible? Quote: Pheonixia “Women must not wear men’s clothing nor a man wear women’s clothing for the Lord your God detests anyone who does this” (Deuteronomy 22:5). THis is old testament stuff. We acknowledge it but do not follow its rules like Jews do. Study history behind the text and you discover that it is an allusion to Canaanite religions which were believed to contain immoral practices. (which, if you copy-pasted from a bible online, you won't get the footnotes explaining why it said so)
The book of Joshua also advocates genocide, but we don't adhere to that .
So you believe it was only a commandment for the specific people of the time? Conclusion: Very interesting interpretations.......I see how people can differ on even a single quote........ The world would be a much easier place if people did not differ on quotes........ Even in Islam people do.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:43 pm
Pheonixia Quote: Pheonixia It is written in the Bible FIRST AND FOREMOST...I am a Catholic. This means I do not take the Bible verbatim...word for word. I was taught that there is a lot more to scripture that meets the eye. And it's not just the text. Muslims may take the Qu'ran literally (or whichever sects do) and other Christian faiths do, but my faith does not. I didn't know that. But, then where do your beliefs come from? If [not solely from what is written in the Bible?] We believe that God inspired the writers of the Bible. Meaning we take extra time to translate them to the best of our ability. We don't interpret literally, but based on the time it was written, the language it was written in at the time, where and who wrote it...ect. We use the Bible and Catholic Catechism (which I think is similar to your hadiths) to establish our beliefs. Pheonixia Quote: Pheonixia “Women must not wear men’s clothing nor a man wear women’s clothing for the Lord your God detests anyone who does this” (Deuteronomy 22:5). THis is old testament stuff. We acknowledge it but do not follow its rules like Jews do. Study history behind the text and you discover that it is an allusion to Canaanite religions which were believed to contain immoral practices. (which, if you copy-pasted from a bible online, you won't get the footnotes explaining why it said so)
The book of Joshua also advocates genocide, but we don't adhere to that .
So you believe it was only a commandment for the specific people of the time? We're not Jewish. This is Jewish law. We acknowledge that they had this in ancient times. But we don't see the virtue in following this. Remember, Christianity broke off of Judaism. We do not adhere to Jewish law. Same reason why you don't follow all Christian and Jewish beliefs. Pheonixia Conclusion: Very interesting interpretations.......I see how people can differ on even a single quote........ The world would be a much easier place if people did not differ on quotes........ Even in Islam people do......... Most Catholics have the same interpretation. We have a hierarchy of priests, bishops, scholars, cardinals ect. that designate the general Catholic interpretation of the bible. It's also stated in our Catechism as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:55 pm
Mini_Angel_1994 And I really can't understand, why there are really too many branches in Christianity? Because people didn't like what the Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox was teaching. They left and made up their own branch. Mini_Angel_1994 And why don't Catholics take Bible as a reference? We do. We just don't take it literally. Take the Creation story for example. We believe it to be a poetic interpretation of how the world came into being, not that the world was actually created in 7 days and whatnot. Mini_Angel_1994 Isn't it written by Jesus? No, it wasn't. Nothing in the New Testament, our Gospels and whatnot was written by Jesus. Mini_Angel_1994 If not, then who wrote it? If so, why don't you follow it then? Many many people. His followers and the followers of his followers ect. There was oral tradition before it was written down. Again, we don't take it literally. We understand that God inspired these people, but we take into consideration ALL the influencing factors that may have created the certain text that the authors wrote. That way we get a full picture of what should be our moral guideline from God.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 7:44 pm
I suppose the easiest way to explain what Ratri means (because, forgive me if I'm wrong, but I think a few of you may be a little confused) is that Catholics don't believe many of the stories actually happened, but that they take the moral of the story.
In Adam and Eve, there are many morals that can be taken. That you're not supposed to go against God. That you should not give in to temptations. That you should not take what you have for granted. And, of course, that you should never eat apples. wink Just kidding, obviously.
But to believe in these simpler ideas, you don't have to believe that the story happened exactly as it is written. The idea is that the stories are made up just to give us examples.
Think of it as... This is a bad comparison. But think of it as fairytales.
In the story of Little Red Riding Hood, she stops to talk to the wolf, and tells him where she is going, why she is going there, etc.
Then the wolf follows her and eats her whole. (The tree-cutter saves her by cutting her out of the wolf's stomach, but that's beside the point.)
The moral of that story could be taken as "Don't talk to strangers." But people know it didn't actually happen.
So that's sort of how it works, if I understand correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:06 pm
BeXlieXve I suppose the easiest way to explain what Ratri means (because, forgive me if I'm wrong, but I think a few of you may be a little confused) is that Catholics don't believe many of the stories actually happened, but that they take the moral of the story. In Adam and Eve, there are many morals that can be taken. That you're not supposed to go against God. That you should not give in to temptations. That you should not take what you have for granted. And, of course, that you should never eat apples. wink Just kidding, obviously. But to believe in these simpler ideas, you don't have to believe that the story happened exactly as it is written. The idea is that the stories are made up just to give us examples. Think of it as... This is a bad comparison. But think of it as fairytales. In the story of Little Red Riding Hood, she stops to talk to the wolf, and tells him where she is going, why she is going there, etc. Then the wolf follows her and eats her whole. (The tree-cutter saves her by cutting her out of the wolf's stomach, but that's beside the point.) The moral of that story could be taken as "Don't talk to strangers." But people know it didn't actually happen. So that's sort of how it works, if I understand correctly. In a way, yes. Let's used Red Riding Hood as an example. 1) we'd look at the original story in written form and try to figure out when the story was actually written 2)From that original written story, we'd investigate what might have inspired the author to write down the story, what language was it origanally written from, were there any influencing cultures, and depending on when Red Riding hood was written, you could see a huge difference in language and what the words really meant back then verses now. Take for example the word "gay". It used to just mean that a person was happy, the clothes were brightly colored, just happiness. Now it is used to categorize "homosexual".
See what I just did? Look at that whole lot of information I gained from doing research. Now when I look at the text I realize that when the story says something like X, they really mean XYZ, because that word had a different meaning back then. Or the people talked like that. Then I see how they viewed it and try to apply it for modern times.
There are a huge amounts of euphemisms (a nice way of saying something) in the Bible, especially concerning genitals and sex. you would totally miss the real meaning if you didn't understand what the words really meant.
to sum it up: they're [the holy scriptures/bible] more like guidelines, anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 2:43 am
Aha, so from what I understand from both of you, that you're afraid that it might have another meaning. Well, that's what we do with Quran ( Forgive me for bringing this into the subject ). Quran uses lots of meanings that even I ( I'm Arabian ) can't understand. But it doesn't mean that I should just forget about it. The best thing in my life that we actually learn Quran, and the teacher explains the very little details about it. What does a word mean? And how do we pronounce it, and what did it mean in the past and what does it mean now. You probably don't know it but Arabic language is pretty hard. Because a single word contains at max 5 meanings.
From what I understand, that you get the orders from what you can understand from those stories. But, what I can't understand, that, orders, I mean, orders from God, do this, don't do that. I know that you should go to church on Sunday, and have some lectures. But certain worshipping actions. Like prayers, where did you get it? and I know you fast but in your own way, how did you know that there's something like that? If you don't take your Bible litterly. Well, I can't see from where you get those orders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:40 am
Mini_Angel_1994 Aha, so from what I understand from both of you, that you're afraid that it might have another meaning. We're not afraid of another meaning, we KNOW that there is another meaning. The real trick is to find the correct one. This changes over time as our understanding of ancient hebrew and cultures around that time grows. The more knowledge we gain from our surroundings and the past, the better we see what direction the Scriptures lead us. Mini_Angel_1994 Well, that's what we do with Quran ( Forgive me for bringing this into the subject ). Quran uses lots of meanings that even I ( I'm Arabian ) can't understand. But it doesn't mean that I should just forget about it. We don't forget parts we don't understand, we try our best to understand it and get to the source of our inability to understand. Mini_Angel_1994 The best thing in my life that we actually learn Quran, and the teacher explains the very little details about it. What does a word mean? And how do we pronounce it, and what did it mean in the past and what does it mean now. You probably don't know it but Arabic language is pretty hard. Because a single word contains at max 5 meanings. There's a lot more to learning and understanding ancient pieces of literature than just etymology (tracing and studying the words of a particular text). You can memorize all you want, but the real question is...do you truly understand it and have a grasp on the meaning?Mini_Angel_1994 From what I understand, that you get the orders from what you can understand from those stories. What I understand from stories is not based off of orders. How to understand it, by not taking it literally, is a Catholic Tradition.Mini_Angel_1994 I mean, orders from God, do this, don't do that. I know that you should go to church on Sunday, and have some lectures. But certain worshipping actions. Like prayers, where did you get it? The bible. Mass is basically a revamp of the Jewish Passover celebrated every Sunday....which is in the bible....which we don't take literally.... Key words: Last Supper.
Prayers are not historical fact. They are praises to God, for which we have no qualms about taking straight from the Bible. And Saints and other important people in the ChurchMini_Angel_1994 I know you fast but in your own way, how did you know that there's something like that? If you don't take your Bible litterly. Well, I can't see from where you get those orders. Well, we use the Gospel as a guideline (how to fast is demonstrated by Jesus). A lot of this is based off of Catholic tradition...which is based off a non-literal interpretation of the bible.
We also have a heirarchy in the Catholic Church, which relies on prayers, wisdom and then some, along with the help of scholars (biblical, historical, ect) to establish the doctrine of the church...how everyone is supposed to celebrate it, in according to the wisdom of the Holy Spirit.
We don't come up with these notions at the drop of a hat...it's a long, arduous process to ensure that we're not adjusting or making up new sections of belief without the authority of God.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|