|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 6:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 8:36 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 9:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 12:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:12 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Pixeliciousness Wouldn't the mcdonalds approach also signify evil?
If you doubt the good, kind-hearted, caring of a giant mega-corporation bent on serving you food from cradle to grave, then check out this promotional flash game.
http://www.mcvideogame.com/
It's got Ronald! biggrin
Captain Joey Lickems Yeah people have been saying that the furry thing didn't start till the 80's... Maybe a large group calture, but the basis of furry fandom has been around forever. Just look at the egyptions. eek Yeah they were so furries.
I wouldn't call them furries really.. They may have had many aspects that are associated with furries today. (I don't know, but I doubt we know whether or not Egyptians were "fans of anthropomorphic creatures", or were more serious and worshiped them or what.) The same could be said about Renaissance Artists, who made a whole bunch of weird creatures in their decor. I wouldn't consider them furries. They made art that happened to have anthropomorphic creatures. While this may be considered furry to some, for them it wasn't and was not the intent. ...unless they really really liked those things, but you can't know without asking them and they're long gone. razz
Here's some Renaissance Art...sorta... Well, depends on whether or not you talk about the Italian Renaissance or not. http://bibliodyssey.blogspot.com/2007/07/ornamental-decoration-in-17th-century.html
Though in all fairness, they drew from classical sources for many of their creatures. Even under Gothic, some of the grotesques came from old pagan beliefs such as a very common depiction of an "tree man" ...Or something like that. Sometimes an old man with leaves coming out of or covering parts of his face.
http://www.stonecarver.com/jpeg/greenman.jpg Here's an example I snagged, which may not be gothic at all, but it gives a picture to what I'm talking about.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|