|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:21 pm
|
Essy ze Ninja Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 1:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:21 pm
|
|
|
|
Tah: Nuh. Nevah. o3o
Bug430 Really bunny. I've had enough of physics; so I know a few things. But you also need to account for bouncing off a bludger bat as well, which in a way, could make a bludger drastically slower or faster. So there is some initial velocity to that making the total energy even higher, or lower, depending on final speed, which you would need the distance and acceleration of the bludger along with initial velocity to find. I don't know if you could call it a head on collision with the bludger, well 'elastic collision'. Cause I could find that intial through that as well.
Pfft. I only had physics for a week, so my knowledge pool is still super shallow. Hypothetically speaking, I could hypothesize about all the lengths and acceleration and such, but that would take too long. Hence why I didn't translate kinetic energy into work or force, which is more relate-able than joules. But who know? Maybe somewhere down my current year, I will find my answer to that, then come back and do all the mathy calculations. This is certainly a topic to pursue further. o3o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 6:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:11 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:20 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 10:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:57 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|