|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:22 am
 |
|
|
 |
LimeyFish8 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 LimeyFish8 sora506 The US is gonna invade the minute they "say" the gov. is going madder. Go in, have war for 40 years, and leave things worse than ever, because we are like that. cool But, but, they had a nuclear weapons program were being opressed by a facist dictator need to have a strong military presence until their government is set up uh, ******** it, we like killing and the government likes the power it gives it over us. True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Terrorists attacked on 9-11, not the Iraqi military. Bush has, as commander in cheif, the power to send the Marines anywhere he damn well pleases and while he may only be a figur head all of the warmongering conservative representatives gave him permission to do what he wanted, they didn't tell him that he should ask to go to war, they agreed with him.
The media is simply playing off what alot of the protesters want to see for ratings... after all drama sells more than peace.
Not only that where not fighting the Iraqi military last time I checked, where fighting the Alkida. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:23 am
|
|
|
|
LimeyFish8 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 LimeyFish8 sora506 The US is gonna invade the minute they "say" the gov. is going madder. Go in, have war for 40 years, and leave things worse than ever, because we are like that. cool But, but, they had a nuclear weapons program were being opressed by a facist dictator need to have a strong military presence until their government is set up uh, ******** it, we like killing and the government likes the power it gives it over us. True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Terrorists attacked on 9-11, not the Iraqi military. Bush has, as commander in cheif, the power to send the Marines anywhere he damn well pleases and while he may only be a figur head all of the warmongering conservative representatives gave him permission to do what he wanted, they didn't tell him that he should ask to go to war, they agreed with him.
(>^_^)>  o(.__.o)
Plus, Bin Laden has nothing to do with Iraq.
The war in Iraq is for pure financial gain, because of Iraq's rich oil deposits.
[Yet ironically, oil prices increased because of war.]
And heh, Bush as figure head?
So are you saying that the government in general, is to be blamed then, and not only Bush?
Behind-the-scenes people? In a democracy? Surely not.
Oh, conspiracy theories.
All in all, this war in the middle east is unnecessary, as far as Iraq goes. And going against UN for this war?
Doesn't put the US government in the good light.
♪ Jaejoong: We poked jellyfish at the beach. ₪ |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:25 am
|
|
|
|
sora506 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 LimeyFish8 sora506 The US is gonna invade the minute they "say" the gov. is going madder. Go in, have war for 40 years, and leave things worse than ever, because we are like that. cool But, but, they had a nuclear weapons program were being opressed by a facist dictator need to have a strong military presence until their government is set up uh, ******** it, we like killing and the government likes the power it gives it over us. True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Good thing you said that, cause you know I was. But have you ever looked at the 911 footage. It looks like a controlled fall, like how demoltions break buildings. But I'll save my conspiracy theories for another day. I'm the first to admit I'm slow as hell but didn't this start with afghanistan? Terrorist were there we beat the crap out of them and went to Iraq for some reason no one ever explained to me. All I know is we've been over there, what, 4 years now and nothings better.
The war was not done effeciantly, thats what I am very disapointed about, however that doesn't mean it shouldn't of had been done.
Also, setting up that fall so we could go fight Iraq qould be idiotic, it caused a huge drop in economy there would be no point to faking that and bieng so evil and cold hearted as to kill that many of your own people simply for an opportunity to go kill more people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:27 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:28 am
|
|
|
|
Treya Ochiern LimeyFish8 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 LimeyFish8 sora506 The US is gonna invade the minute they "say" the gov. is going madder. Go in, have war for 40 years, and leave things worse than ever, because we are like that. cool But, but, they had a nuclear weapons program were being opressed by a facist dictator need to have a strong military presence until their government is set up uh, ******** it, we like killing and the government likes the power it gives it over us. True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Terrorists attacked on 9-11, not the Iraqi military. Bush has, as commander in cheif, the power to send the Marines anywhere he damn well pleases and while he may only be a figur head all of the warmongering conservative representatives gave him permission to do what he wanted, they didn't tell him that he should ask to go to war, they agreed with him. (>^_^)> o(.__.o)
Plus, Bin Laden has nothing to do with Iraq.
The war in Iraq is for pure financial gain, because of Iraq's rich oil deposits.
[Yet ironically, oil prices increased because of war.]
And heh, Bush as figure head?
So are you saying that the government in general, is to be blamed then, and not only Bush?
Behind-the-scenes people? In a democracy? Surely not.
Oh, conspiracy theories.
All in all, this war in the middle east is unnecessary, as far as Iraq goes. And going against UN for this war?
Doesn't put the US government in the good light.
♪ Jaejoong: We poked jellyfish at the beach. ₪
I don't think an all out war was the right move, but we had to make some move to stop the attacks and take the fight off our soild sense deffance wasn't working.
Oh and not behind the scenes but not in the same light as the president, many people seem to think the presedant as this all powerful person that can make any decision they wish... he can't start a war, he can only ok one proposed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:29 am
|
|
|
|
Dark Bunny Lord LimeyFish8 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 LimeyFish8 sora506 The US is gonna invade the minute they "say" the gov. is going madder. Go in, have war for 40 years, and leave things worse than ever, because we are like that. cool But, but, they had a nuclear weapons program were being opressed by a facist dictator need to have a strong military presence until their government is set up uh, ******** it, we like killing and the government likes the power it gives it over us. True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Terrorists attacked on 9-11, not the Iraqi military. Bush has, as commander in cheif, the power to send the Marines anywhere he damn well pleases and while he may only be a figur head all of the warmongering conservative representatives gave him permission to do what he wanted, they didn't tell him that he should ask to go to war, they agreed with him. And thats whom where fighting. You see alot of this negative media showing the people that don't want us there but thats a small majority (I only know this because my long time friend Cody just got back from Iraq and told him that the majority of the time he was there most people seemed to enjoy there presense) The media is simply playing off what alot of the protesters want to see for ratings... after all drama sells more than peace. Not only that where not fighting the Iraqi military last time I checked, where fighting the Alkida.
The media bandwaggoning on this aside, we aren't fighting Al Queda in Iraq. We are fighting them in Afghanastan in the War on Terror. The OIL has really turned into the US trying to win the inevitable civil war that we started by deposing and detaining their dictator. If anything before this in Iraq was our buisness, this most definitely is not. This war has not only strained our already weakened economy, it has also ruined our national image and given us a reputation that we have been trying to shake for years. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:32 am
|
|
|
|
Dark Bunny Lord sora506 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 LimeyFish8 sora506 The US is gonna invade the minute they "say" the gov. is going madder. Go in, have war for 40 years, and leave things worse than ever, because we are like that. cool But, but, they had a nuclear weapons program were being opressed by a facist dictator need to have a strong military presence until their government is set up uh, ******** it, we like killing and the government likes the power it gives it over us. True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Good thing you said that, cause you know I was. But have you ever looked at the 911 footage. It looks like a controlled fall, like how demoltions break buildings. But I'll save my conspiracy theories for another day. I'm the first to admit I'm slow as hell but didn't this start with afghanistan? Terrorist were there we beat the crap out of them and went to Iraq for some reason no one ever explained to me. All I know is we've been over there, what, 4 years now and nothings better. No, things are better, not as good as they should be and I'll agree on that point but they are better. Sadaam is no longer in his seat of power and many of the fanatic factions are widdeling down. The war was not done effeciantly, thats what I am very disapointed about, however that doesn't mean it shouldn't of had been done. Also, setting up that fall so we could go fight Iraq qould be idiotic, it caused a huge drop in economy there would be no point to faking that and bieng so evil and cold hearted as to kill that many of your own people simply for an opportunity to go kill more people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:33 am
|
|
|
|
Dark Bunny Lord Treya Ochiern LimeyFish8 Dark Bunny Lord sora506 True and the fact the the dictator is a crazy-son-of-a only helps us to cover for it. 3nodding We're only waiting for the opportune moment. *Watched Pirates of the Caribbean for the third time this week* No, they attacked us... repatativly over the years... and did anyone forget 9-11... if we sat back and did nothing what message does that send out? That we won't retaliate? Sorry but even though the launch wasn't quite the best thing ever, the purpose behind sending troops to Iraq was a good one. Don't even start to blame this on bush... the president is a face, they make practically not decissions, they just give the final go around and hold less power than many other members of the government. Terrorists attacked on 9-11, not the Iraqi military. Bush has, as commander in cheif, the power to send the Marines anywhere he damn well pleases and while he may only be a figur head all of the warmongering conservative representatives gave him permission to do what he wanted, they didn't tell him that he should ask to go to war, they agreed with him. (>^_^)> o(.__.o)
Plus, Bin Laden has nothing to do with Iraq.
The war in Iraq is for pure financial gain, because of Iraq's rich oil deposits.
[Yet ironically, oil prices increased because of war.]
And heh, Bush as figure head?
So are you saying that the government in general, is to be blamed then, and not only Bush?
Behind-the-scenes people? In a democracy? Surely not.
Oh, conspiracy theories.
All in all, this war in the middle east is unnecessary, as far as Iraq goes. And going against UN for this war?
Doesn't put the US government in the good light.
♪ Jaejoong: We poked jellyfish at the beach. ₪ Ok so what should we have done, just answer me that? I don't think an all out war was the right move, but we had to make some move to stop the attacks and take the fight off our soild sense deffance wasn't working. Oh and not behind the scenes but not in the same light as the president, many people seem to think the presedant as this all powerful person that can make any decision they wish... he can't start a war, he can only ok one proposed.
The President must ask congress to go to war, the final descision is made by the general assembly. I think this could have been handled quickly and cleanly with a couple of tactical snipers or a well placed car bomb and a motion made in the UN. People have no faith in international enforcement or intervention and this would be an opourtune placce to prove its usefullness. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 05, 2006 12:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
