|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:30 am
It is not okay to have it in your signature because anyone on Gaia can see it. In a thread, they don't necessarily go to it. And it doesn't matter what you tell the admins of Gaia, they will still force you to remove it. I advise you do it before someone reports you for it and your sig is disabled.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:50 pm
We're just trying to give you a friendl head's up about it, 'tis all. If no one's said anything by now, I won't be the first to do so. Just be aware that J had to have his sig removed for the same general imagery... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:19 pm
My Site: http://www.furaffinity.net/user/shoki/Bust Shot: 20k Full-Body: 40k (only digital atm) PM me if interested. I do prefer cash, and it will guarantee it gets done faster, but you'll have to go through my site on FA, not here on Gaia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:40 pm
Leyla Giselle It is not okay to have it in your signature because anyone on Gaia can see it. In a thread, they don't necessarily go to it. And it doesn't matter what you tell the admins of Gaia, they will still force you to remove it. I advise you do it before someone reports you for it and your sig is disabled. I'll take my chances, it's been over two years and I've never been reported. Thanks though. Manda_Tifa We're just trying to give you a friendl head's up about it, 'tis all. If no one's said anything by now, I won't be the first to do so. Just be aware that J had to have his sig removed for the same general imagery... sweatdrop That's silly when you can see more on TV or your male pet, but if the internet has to be more censored than day-time TV then it's really stupid but I guess I can't do anything about it. If someone ever does report me I'll argue my point, but I can't do anything if they decide to remove my signature. Wait and see I guess. wink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 9:42 pm
shoki_de_nai My Site: http://www.furaffinity.net/user/shoki/Bust Shot: 20k Full-Body: 40k (only digital atm) PM me if interested. I do prefer cash, and it will guarantee it gets done faster, but you'll have to go through my site on FA, not here on Gaia. Sure, looks good. Full Body for 40k please. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:21 am
Pride Leyla Giselle It is not okay to have it in your signature because anyone on Gaia can see it. In a thread, they don't necessarily go to it. And it doesn't matter what you tell the admins of Gaia, they will still force you to remove it. I advise you do it before someone reports you for it and your sig is disabled. I'll take my chances, it's been over two years and I've never been reported. Thanks though. Manda_Tifa We're just trying to give you a friendl head's up about it, 'tis all. If no one's said anything by now, I won't be the first to do so. Just be aware that J had to have his sig removed for the same general imagery... sweatdrop That's silly when you can see more on TV or your male pet, but if the internet has to be more censored than day-time TV then it's really stupid but I guess I can't do anything about it. If someone ever does report me I'll argue my point, but I can't do anything if they decide to remove my signature. Wait and see I guess. wink It's about protecting themselves against lawsuits from pretentious parents who don't want their children shown things till they reach a certain age.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:24 am
Leyla Giselle Pride Leyla Giselle It is not okay to have it in your signature because anyone on Gaia can see it. In a thread, they don't necessarily go to it. And it doesn't matter what you tell the admins of Gaia, they will still force you to remove it. I advise you do it before someone reports you for it and your sig is disabled. I'll take my chances, it's been over two years and I've never been reported. Thanks though. Manda_Tifa We're just trying to give you a friendl head's up about it, 'tis all. If no one's said anything by now, I won't be the first to do so. Just be aware that J had to have his sig removed for the same general imagery... sweatdrop That's silly when you can see more on TV or your male pet, but if the internet has to be more censored than day-time TV then it's really stupid but I guess I can't do anything about it. If someone ever does report me I'll argue my point, but I can't do anything if they decide to remove my signature. Wait and see I guess. wink It's about protecting themselves against lawsuits from pretentious parents who don't want their children shown things till they reach a certain age. Then they already screwed-up by giving their kids internet access, if they somehow managed to keep them from ever seeing a real male animal in real life before they learned to use a computer and navigate a website like this one. rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 2:39 pm
Pride Sure that would be fine, and I'd love a full body quad picture. The only thing I ask is that you pose him so that a little bit shows, nothing adult or above PG13, but to show he's male like in my siggy. 3nodding Gah, I'm afraid I'm going to have to back out of doing a commission for now. Some real life stuff just came up, and I know I'm going to be swamped for a while. I don't like to leave my commissioners hanging for extended periods. When I have time again, I'll swing by this thread and see if your still looking to commission me. So sorry for having to back out for now though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:15 pm
Pride shoki_de_nai My Site: http://www.furaffinity.net/user/shoki/Bust Shot: 20k Full-Body: 40k (only digital atm) PM me if interested. I do prefer cash, and it will guarantee it gets done faster, but you'll have to go through my site on FA, not here on Gaia. Sure, looks good. Full Body for 40k please. 3nodding Okay. I did say PM me though, I don't check in here regularly. >> Anywho, I'll get to work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:59 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Pride Leyla Giselle Pride Leyla Giselle It is not okay to have it in your signature because anyone on Gaia can see it. In a thread, they don't necessarily go to it. And it doesn't matter what you tell the admins of Gaia, they will still force you to remove it. I advise you do it before someone reports you for it and your sig is disabled. I'll take my chances, it's been over two years and I've never been reported. Thanks though. Manda_Tifa We're just trying to give you a friendl head's up about it, 'tis all. If no one's said anything by now, I won't be the first to do so. Just be aware that J had to have his sig removed for the same general imagery... sweatdrop That's silly when you can see more on TV or your male pet, but if the internet has to be more censored than day-time TV then it's really stupid but I guess I can't do anything about it. If someone ever does report me I'll argue my point, but I can't do anything if they decide to remove my signature. Wait and see I guess. wink It's about protecting themselves against lawsuits from pretentious parents who don't want their children shown things till they reach a certain age. Then they already screwed-up by giving their kids internet access, if they somehow managed to keep them from ever seeing a real male animal in real life before they learned to use a computer and navigate a website like this one. rofl You come off as highly arogant, which is obnoxious. You may not realize this, but there are child blocks on browsers and certain internet service providers provide a child block service. It's not about what you might think or what you want, or what you believe, rules arerules, end of story.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 2:57 pm
Leyla Giselle Pride Leyla Giselle Pride Leyla Giselle It is not okay to have it in your signature because anyone on Gaia can see it. In a thread, they don't necessarily go to it. And it doesn't matter what you tell the admins of Gaia, they will still force you to remove it. I advise you do it before someone reports you for it and your sig is disabled. I'll take my chances, it's been over two years and I've never been reported. Thanks though. Manda_Tifa We're just trying to give you a friendl head's up about it, 'tis all. If no one's said anything by now, I won't be the first to do so. Just be aware that J had to have his sig removed for the same general imagery... sweatdrop That's silly when you can see more on TV or your male pet, but if the internet has to be more censored than day-time TV then it's really stupid but I guess I can't do anything about it. If someone ever does report me I'll argue my point, but I can't do anything if they decide to remove my signature. Wait and see I guess. wink It's about protecting themselves against lawsuits from pretentious parents who don't want their children shown things till they reach a certain age. Then they already screwed-up by giving their kids internet access, if they somehow managed to keep them from ever seeing a real male animal in real life before they learned to use a computer and navigate a website like this one. rofl You come off as highly arogant, which is obnoxious. You may not realize this, but there are child blocks on browsers and certain internet service providers provide a child block service. It's not about what you might think or what you want, or what you believe, rules arerules, end of story. Dear Kettle, I'm not sure if you're aware or not, but you're black. To be honest, I think you're a little too black. Sincerely, Pot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 1:43 am
Krissim Klaw Gah, I'm afraid I'm going to have to back out of doing a commission for now. Some real life stuff just came up, and I know I'm going to be swamped for a while. I don't like to leave my commissioners hanging for extended periods. When I have time again, I'll swing by this thread and see if your still looking to commission me. So sorry for having to back out for now though. I kinda thought that might happen. Okay, thanks. Keep in touch. Leyla Giselle You come off as highly arogant, which is obnoxious. You may not realize this, but there are child blocks on browsers and certain internet service providers provide a child block service. It's not about what you might think or what you want, or what you believe, rules arerules, end of story. I just think it's a little silly for anyone to try and hide the basic anatomy of animals or even their own bodies from children. Then again I don't think encouraging ignorance is a good idea either. That's just my opinion though, and I'm sorry if it offends you. shoki_de_nai Leyla Giselle You come off as highly arogant, which is obnoxious. You may not realize this, but there are child blocks on browsers and certain internet service providers provide a child block service. It's not about what you might think or what you want, or what you believe, rules arerules, end of story. Dear Kettle, I'm not sure if you're aware or not, but you're black. To be honest, I think you're a little too black. Sincerely, Pot shoki_de_nai Okay. I did say PM me though, I don't check in here regularly. >> Anywho, I'll get to work. Oops, sorry. sweatdrop shoki_de_nai Finished. http://www.furaffinity.net/full/816081/ Awesome, thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:08 am
shoki_de_nai Dear Kettle, I'm not sure if you're aware or not, but you're black. To be honest, I think you're a little too black. Sincerely, Pot had to shorten it, it was getting too big to qoute again. I realize i might come off as arrogant, that is not my intention, but if I'm told I'm breaking a rule, I'm more than happy to oblige. On FA, I had to change my icon because i was told by an admin that nudity was not allowed (I had had the icon for a few months). I removed it and changed it to my old icon, then later changed it again. Well Pride might not like the fact that some people would rather not have blatant nudity in sigs, he needs to realize he isn't the only one who uses the site, and that rules are there for a reason. I've had issues before with so called "rules", where I'm told I was being harassing for pointing out fairly intellectual points in a more debating manner. (i.e. I was not being derrogative, insulting, name calling, cursing, and so on). I am not trying to be harrassing, but rather helpful. It'd be dissapointing if he was reported and had his sig disabled because he couldn't listen to quite a few people telling him that it is against the rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:23 pm
Leyla Giselle shoki_de_nai Dear Kettle, I'm not sure if you're aware or not, but you're black. To be honest, I think you're a little too black. Sincerely, Pot had to shorten it, it was getting too big to qoute again. I realize i might come off as arrogant, that is not my intention, but if I'm told I'm breaking a rule, I'm more than happy to oblige. On FA, I had to change my icon because i was told by an admin that nudity was not allowed (I had had the icon for a few months). I removed it and changed it to my old icon, then later changed it again. Well Pride might not like the fact that some people would rather not have blatant nudity in sigs, he needs to realize he isn't the only one who uses the site, and that rules are there for a reason. I've had issues before with so called "rules", where I'm told I was being harassing for pointing out fairly intellectual points in a more debating manner. (i.e. I was not being derrogative, insulting, name calling, cursing, and so on). I am not trying to be harrassing, but rather helpful. It'd be dissapointing if he was reported and had his sig disabled because he couldn't listen to quite a few people telling him that it is against the rules. The rules contridict themselves though. They say PG-13 and they say that tasteful nudity is okay, so if that is the case (since it's right on the rules page) and some moderator comes along and tries to tell me that I'm breaking a rule, when according to the rules I'm not, then I'm going to argue it. It might not help, but if they have an unwritten rule againt anatomical correctness in a signature when an animal is concerned and in a non-sexual way, then it's rather silly of them to say that the site is PG-13, because if they are against my signature then it could only be G rated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
