|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 3:39 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 2:50 pm
|
The One and Only Guardian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:36 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:49 pm
|
|
|
|
Ezra Pound LarryTheLlama666 Ekame Chu probably originated from accents and speaking too quickly. Admittedly, I often use "Wha'chya" when greeting friends in face to face speech. As for accents, think of a southerner, who might say "'Ey, wh'chu doin'?" Did you know there are a group of people who want to change the whole English language to phonetics...? Really? I'm one of them.
Why would a person wish to change our written language? It would be very difficult for such a change to occur, as all of our written word would have to be translated, and in some cases, re-translated, so that it does not become archaic and forgotten.
You obviously have no problems with punctuation or spelling, so what is your reasoning?
If I come off as a tad rude, I do apologize as I am only curious. (Yes, I have been likened to a cat many times.) 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:58 pm
|
|
|
|
subservient_x_nonentity Ezra Pound LarryTheLlama666 Ekame Chu probably originated from accents and speaking too quickly. Admittedly, I often use "Wha'chya" when greeting friends in face to face speech. As for accents, think of a southerner, who might say "'Ey, wh'chu doin'?" Did you know there are a group of people who want to change the whole English language to phonetics...? Really? I'm one of them. Why would a person wish to change our written language? It would be very difficult for such a change to occur, as all of our written word would have to be translated, and in some cases, re-translated, so that it does not become archaic and forgotten. You obviously have no problems with punctuation or spelling, so what is your reasoning? If I come off as a tad rude, I do apologize as I am only curious. (Yes, I have been likened to a cat many times.) 3nodding
Obviously, such a change would occur over time. Probably this would also come to include incorporating a variety of other changes to the language. This would result in a new language ("New English" for the sake of providing a name), and what is presently Modern English would become archaic. And just so you know, by "time" I'm talking a few centuries.
I would greatly prefer a standardized pronunciation scheme because English, as it is now, is way too chaotic.
Eye wood grately preefur eigh pstandirdeyezd proughnunseeeighshun skeem beekuz Inglisch, az it iz nau, iz weigh two keighaughtik.
.. see what I mean?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 3:43 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 6:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:06 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:49 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:07 pm
|
|
|
|
subservient_x_nonentity Ezra Pound Obviously, such a change would occur over time. Probably this would also come to include incorporating a variety of other changes to the language. This would result in a new language ("New English" for the sake of providing a name), and what is presently Modern English would become archaic. And just so you know, by "time" I'm talking a few centuries. I would greatly prefer a standardized pronunciation scheme because English, as it is now, is way too chaotic. Eye wood grately preefur eigh pstandirdeyezd proughnunseeeighshun skeem beekuz Inglisch, az it iz nau, iz weigh two keighaughtik. .. see what I mean? confused Nope. Can't really say I do. It took me a few minutes to read that passage. I had to let my brain adjust.
The point is that it's still pronounced the exact same way.
You know why? Because English is ******** up, and in dire need of an overhaul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|