|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 9:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 10:35 pm
|
Darkened Angel Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:24 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 7:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:11 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:44 pm
|
|
|
|
Rodyn Nelowulf Eh, I dunno. I don't think TOR is going to get the numbers WoW had for quite a while. Just because it's an MMO doesn't mean you can necessarily say those who play fantasy will switch to sci fi. That, and it's blizzard; if they made a starcraft mmo, TOR would be finished. Mazken Blizzard is a pro when it comes to MMO's, everyone knows this.. That's a common misconception. The real reason why WoW is so popular, something that Blizzard themselves admitted, is because of it's low system requirements.
That's more of an opinion. And plus, name a truely terrible blizzard game? You can't. WoW, at best, is "too expensive" and "full of noobs". Yet it still functions wonderfully, has quite a bit of lore and storyline, and looks a hundred times better than any other mmo I know of.
Low system requirements? maybe, but it looks great anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 12:51 pm
|
|
|
|
Nelowulf Rodyn Nelowulf Eh, I dunno. I don't think TOR is going to get the numbers WoW had for quite a while. Just because it's an MMO doesn't mean you can necessarily say those who play fantasy will switch to sci fi. That, and it's blizzard; if they made a starcraft mmo, TOR would be finished. Mazken Blizzard is a pro when it comes to MMO's, everyone knows this.. That's a common misconception. The real reason why WoW is so popular, something that Blizzard themselves admitted, is because of it's low system requirements. That's more of an opinion. And plus, name a truely terrible blizzard game? You can't. WoW, at best, is "too expensive" and "full of noobs". Yet it still functions wonderfully, has quite a bit of lore and storyline, and looks a hundred times better than any other mmo I know of. Low system requirements? maybe, but it looks great anyway. I wouldn't say "great" (particularly the character models) but it's adequate. However, I'm not one of those guys that judges a game based on graphics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:28 pm
|
|
|
|
Rodyn Nelowulf Rodyn Nelowulf Eh, I dunno. I don't think TOR is going to get the numbers WoW had for quite a while. Just because it's an MMO doesn't mean you can necessarily say those who play fantasy will switch to sci fi. That, and it's blizzard; if they made a starcraft mmo, TOR would be finished. Mazken Blizzard is a pro when it comes to MMO's, everyone knows this.. That's a common misconception. The real reason why WoW is so popular, something that Blizzard themselves admitted, is because of it's low system requirements. That's more of an opinion. And plus, name a truely terrible blizzard game? You can't. WoW, at best, is "too expensive" and "full of noobs". Yet it still functions wonderfully, has quite a bit of lore and storyline, and looks a hundred times better than any other mmo I know of. Low system requirements? maybe, but it looks great anyway. I wouldn't say "great" (particularly the character models) but it's adequate. However, I'm not one of those guys that judges a game based on graphics. The reason it doesn't look as "great" anymore is because the game is what: four years old now? Not to mention that many following MMO's tried to copy and mimic the style of the game. It is still is a good looking game despite it's age. And like Nelo said Blizzard really hasn't made a truly bad game, which make the wait for D3 so painful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:55 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:01 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|