|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:10 pm
|
|
|
|
The Curse Hydra Alpharius The Curse I really do not believe in the NWO conspiracy, because there is no tangible way with which 500million people would successfully wipe out 5.5 billion people. Think about it. Nukes, disease, food control. If you were to attempt to wipe out populations with nukes, you would have no control over who dies or how many. Unless you were able to stop the other fifteen countries and their nukes somehow, anyway. Disease is also simply controlled, unless this entire population of 500million is going to include the entire population of every island nation, because all they have to do is stop taking planes. Food control is impossible. You heard me. Impossible, because people can farm.
Yeah, those would be rather difficult to pull off, for ANYONE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 3:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:58 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:44 pm
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel mistercombine The whole idea of the NWO draws from Mankinds inherent paranoia of authority, if I am correct. That, and the fact it gives people a thing to debate over. And you're probably right. For every situation that there isn't a clear answer to, there's always someone spreading an off the wall conspiracy theory, of some kind. Actually, sometimes they do so with situations with a CLEAR answer, too. "9/11 was an inside job!" "Hitler was gay!" "The Lindinbergs killed their own baby, and constructed an "abduction" story for an alibi!" "The Lunar Landing of 1969 was a hoax!" "Swine Flu is a government controlled conspiracy!" "Katrina was caused by Iraqis gathering and praying to Allah to "punish the wicked Americans!"
I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 8:40 am
|
|
|
|
DioxazinePlum black_wing_angel mistercombine The whole idea of the NWO draws from Mankinds inherent paranoia of authority, if I am correct. That, and the fact it gives people a thing to debate over. And you're probably right. For every situation that there isn't a clear answer to, there's always someone spreading an off the wall conspiracy theory, of some kind. Actually, sometimes they do so with situations with a CLEAR answer, too. "9/11 was an inside job!" "Hitler was gay!" "The Lindinbergs killed their own baby, and constructed an "abduction" story for an alibi!" "The Lunar Landing of 1969 was a hoax!" "Swine Flu is a government controlled conspiracy!" "Katrina was caused by Iraqis gathering and praying to Allah to "punish the wicked Americans!" I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world.
Yes, indeed.
But the point stands that, if you can name a bad situation, SOMEONE out there, can surely construct some conspiracy theory that places the blame on some of the ODDEST places. And a lot of the times, they can actually make them seem to make sense, by taking advantage of peoples' lack of understandings.
Prime Example: The whole "9/11 was an inside job!" idea. Now, part of what they used for "proof" was a video that shows the towers falling. In this video, you see windows breaking ahead of the actual path of destruction. The video tells you that these windows are breaking due to "bombs planted on those floors", but in REALITY, the reason those windows were breaking, was because, when you have that much pressure moving downward, that fast, it builds up air pressure, as the downward bound path of destruction forces air into a compressed state. At some point, the pressure becomes greater than the windows can handle, and the weakest one shatters, as air escapes it, much like a balloon exploding when air forces itself out of a weakened spot in the balloon's surface.
Now, most people don't think "physics" enough to realize that part. Hell, someone had to explain it to me! So, for these people, to hear "DA WINDOWS IZ BRAKIN CUZ OV BOMZ XPLODING!" sounds like a logical answer. And they fall for it, hook, line, and sinker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:03 am
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel DioxazinePlum black_wing_angel mistercombine The whole idea of the NWO draws from Mankinds inherent paranoia of authority, if I am correct. That, and the fact it gives people a thing to debate over. And you're probably right. For every situation that there isn't a clear answer to, there's always someone spreading an off the wall conspiracy theory, of some kind. Actually, sometimes they do so with situations with a CLEAR answer, too. "9/11 was an inside job!" "Hitler was gay!" "The Lindinbergs killed their own baby, and constructed an "abduction" story for an alibi!" "The Lunar Landing of 1969 was a hoax!" "Swine Flu is a government controlled conspiracy!" "Katrina was caused by Iraqis gathering and praying to Allah to "punish the wicked Americans!" I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world. Yes, indeed. But the point stands that, if you can name a bad situation, SOMEONE out there, can surely construct some conspiracy theory that places the blame on some of the ODDEST places. And a lot of the times, they can actually make them seem to make sense, by taking advantage of peoples' lack of understandings. Prime Example: The whole "9/11 was an inside job!" idea. Now, part of what they used for "proof" was a video that shows the towers falling. In this video, you see windows breaking ahead of the actual path of destruction. The video tells you that these windows are breaking due to "bombs planted on those floors", but in REALITY, the reason those windows were breaking, was because, when you have that much pressure moving downward, that fast, it builds up air pressure, as the downward bound path of destruction forces air into a compressed state. At some point, the pressure becomes greater than the windows can handle, and the weakest one shatters, as air escapes it, much like a balloon exploding when air forces itself out of a weakened spot in the balloon's surface. Now, most people don't think "physics" enough to realize that part. Hell, someone had to explain it to me! So, for these people, to hear "DA WINDOWS IZ BRAKIN CUZ OV BOMZ XPLODING!" sounds like a logical answer. And they fall for it, hook, line, and sinker. If I recall, every window that exploded was from the same column. I'm sure it had to do something with the dynamic of the building falling, but it certainly leads credence to the 'controlled demolition' theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:16 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel black_wing_angel DioxazinePlum black_wing_angel mistercombine The whole idea of the NWO draws from Mankinds inherent paranoia of authority, if I am correct. That, and the fact it gives people a thing to debate over. And you're probably right. For every situation that there isn't a clear answer to, there's always someone spreading an off the wall conspiracy theory, of some kind. Actually, sometimes they do so with situations with a CLEAR answer, too. "9/11 was an inside job!" "Hitler was gay!" "The Lindinbergs killed their own baby, and constructed an "abduction" story for an alibi!" "The Lunar Landing of 1969 was a hoax!" "Swine Flu is a government controlled conspiracy!" "Katrina was caused by Iraqis gathering and praying to Allah to "punish the wicked Americans!" I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world. Yes, indeed. But the point stands that, if you can name a bad situation, SOMEONE out there, can surely construct some conspiracy theory that places the blame on some of the ODDEST places. And a lot of the times, they can actually make them seem to make sense, by taking advantage of peoples' lack of understandings. Prime Example: The whole "9/11 was an inside job!" idea. Now, part of what they used for "proof" was a video that shows the towers falling. In this video, you see windows breaking ahead of the actual path of destruction. The video tells you that these windows are breaking due to "bombs planted on those floors", but in REALITY, the reason those windows were breaking, was because, when you have that much pressure moving downward, that fast, it builds up air pressure, as the downward bound path of destruction forces air into a compressed state. At some point, the pressure becomes greater than the windows can handle, and the weakest one shatters, as air escapes it, much like a balloon exploding when air forces itself out of a weakened spot in the balloon's surface. Now, most people don't think "physics" enough to realize that part. Hell, someone had to explain it to me! So, for these people, to hear "DA WINDOWS IZ BRAKIN CUZ OV BOMZ XPLODING!" sounds like a logical answer. And they fall for it, hook, line, and sinker. If I recall, every window that exploded was from the same column. I'm sure it had to do something with the dynamic of the building falling, but it certainly leads credence to the 'controlled demolition' theory.
Actually, if I remember it correctly, there was no real "pattern" to the blowouts, just random windows going out.
And that's how it works. They find an "explanation" that supports their idea, and they show you the video, explaining it "their way", and your mind, having no immediate means to actually question what you're seeing, believes it, until a new idea can be introduced. It's all part of the whole "power of suggestion" concept.
However, some people never think to seek a "new idea", whether due to laziness, or just gullibility, so they believe it, unquestioningly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:29 am
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Fresnel black_wing_angel DioxazinePlum black_wing_angel mistercombine The whole idea of the NWO draws from Mankinds inherent paranoia of authority, if I am correct. That, and the fact it gives people a thing to debate over. And you're probably right. For every situation that there isn't a clear answer to, there's always someone spreading an off the wall conspiracy theory, of some kind. Actually, sometimes they do so with situations with a CLEAR answer, too. "9/11 was an inside job!" "Hitler was gay!" "The Lindinbergs killed their own baby, and constructed an "abduction" story for an alibi!" "The Lunar Landing of 1969 was a hoax!" "Swine Flu is a government controlled conspiracy!" "Katrina was caused by Iraqis gathering and praying to Allah to "punish the wicked Americans!" I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world. Yes, indeed. But the point stands that, if you can name a bad situation, SOMEONE out there, can surely construct some conspiracy theory that places the blame on some of the ODDEST places. And a lot of the times, they can actually make them seem to make sense, by taking advantage of peoples' lack of understandings. Prime Example: The whole "9/11 was an inside job!" idea. Now, part of what they used for "proof" was a video that shows the towers falling. In this video, you see windows breaking ahead of the actual path of destruction. The video tells you that these windows are breaking due to "bombs planted on those floors", but in REALITY, the reason those windows were breaking, was because, when you have that much pressure moving downward, that fast, it builds up air pressure, as the downward bound path of destruction forces air into a compressed state. At some point, the pressure becomes greater than the windows can handle, and the weakest one shatters, as air escapes it, much like a balloon exploding when air forces itself out of a weakened spot in the balloon's surface. Now, most people don't think "physics" enough to realize that part. Hell, someone had to explain it to me! So, for these people, to hear "DA WINDOWS IZ BRAKIN CUZ OV BOMZ XPLODING!" sounds like a logical answer. And they fall for it, hook, line, and sinker. If I recall, every window that exploded was from the same column. I'm sure it had to do something with the dynamic of the building falling, but it certainly leads credence to the 'controlled demolition' theory. Actually, if I remember it correctly, there was no real "pattern" to the blowouts, just random windows going out. And that's how it works. They find an "explanation" that supports their idea, and they show you the video, explaining it "their way", and your mind, having no immediate means to actually question what you're seeing, believes it, until a new idea can be introduced. It's all part of the whole "power of suggestion" concept. However, some people never think to seek a "new idea", whether due to laziness, or just gullibility, so they believe it, unquestioningly. No, you're right. There's no pattern.
I love how these videos are all "OMG! repetitive loud noises, they MUST be bombs!" Did anyone ever stop to think that a million tons of cement and steel smashing into the building under it floor by floor would make loud noises with a predictable pattern?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:36 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel black_wing_angel Fresnel black_wing_angel DioxazinePlum I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world. Yes, indeed. But the point stands that, if you can name a bad situation, SOMEONE out there, can surely construct some conspiracy theory that places the blame on some of the ODDEST places. And a lot of the times, they can actually make them seem to make sense, by taking advantage of peoples' lack of understandings. Prime Example: The whole "9/11 was an inside job!" idea. Now, part of what they used for "proof" was a video that shows the towers falling. In this video, you see windows breaking ahead of the actual path of destruction. The video tells you that these windows are breaking due to "bombs planted on those floors", but in REALITY, the reason those windows were breaking, was because, when you have that much pressure moving downward, that fast, it builds up air pressure, as the downward bound path of destruction forces air into a compressed state. At some point, the pressure becomes greater than the windows can handle, and the weakest one shatters, as air escapes it, much like a balloon exploding when air forces itself out of a weakened spot in the balloon's surface. Now, most people don't think "physics" enough to realize that part. Hell, someone had to explain it to me! So, for these people, to hear "DA WINDOWS IZ BRAKIN CUZ OV BOMZ XPLODING!" sounds like a logical answer. And they fall for it, hook, line, and sinker. If I recall, every window that exploded was from the same column. I'm sure it had to do something with the dynamic of the building falling, but it certainly leads credence to the 'controlled demolition' theory. Actually, if I remember it correctly, there was no real "pattern" to the blowouts, just random windows going out. And that's how it works. They find an "explanation" that supports their idea, and they show you the video, explaining it "their way", and your mind, having no immediate means to actually question what you're seeing, believes it, until a new idea can be introduced. It's all part of the whole "power of suggestion" concept. However, some people never think to seek a "new idea", whether due to laziness, or just gullibility, so they believe it, unquestioningly. No, you're right. There's no pattern. I love how these videos are all "OMG! repetitive loud noises, they MUST be bombs!" Did anyone ever stop to think that a million tons of cement and steel smashing into the building under it floor by floor would make loud noises with a predictable pattern?
Lol, again, that's the power of suggestion. During the time when your mind would be asking "WHAT THE ******** WAS THAT?!" before it can find an answer, an answer is introduced. In this case "that sound, is bombs going off!", and your brain accepts that answer, until a new, more logical answer can be introduced. But, that requires the person to SEEK a new answer, if no one introduces it to them, personally.
Basically, anyone who's been convinced that "it was bombs" would probably feel like an idiot when they learn what you just explained, as well as what I explained. But, until they are explained, they believe whatever they've heard, that best answers the questions in their mind. And, in many cases, a "better" answer, never reaches their mind, due to their gullibility, or laziness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 10:28 am
|
|
|
|
black_wing_angel Fresnel black_wing_angel Fresnel black_wing_angel DioxazinePlum I agree. If every conspiracy theory was correct we would be living in an extremely frightening world. Yes, indeed. But the point stands that, if you can name a bad situation, SOMEONE out there, can surely construct some conspiracy theory that places the blame on some of the ODDEST places. And a lot of the times, they can actually make them seem to make sense, by taking advantage of peoples' lack of understandings. Prime Example: The whole "9/11 was an inside job!" idea. Now, part of what they used for "proof" was a video that shows the towers falling. In this video, you see windows breaking ahead of the actual path of destruction. The video tells you that these windows are breaking due to "bombs planted on those floors", but in REALITY, the reason those windows were breaking, was because, when you have that much pressure moving downward, that fast, it builds up air pressure, as the downward bound path of destruction forces air into a compressed state. At some point, the pressure becomes greater than the windows can handle, and the weakest one shatters, as air escapes it, much like a balloon exploding when air forces itself out of a weakened spot in the balloon's surface. Now, most people don't think "physics" enough to realize that part. Hell, someone had to explain it to me! So, for these people, to hear "DA WINDOWS IZ BRAKIN CUZ OV BOMZ XPLODING!" sounds like a logical answer. And they fall for it, hook, line, and sinker. If I recall, every window that exploded was from the same column. I'm sure it had to do something with the dynamic of the building falling, but it certainly leads credence to the 'controlled demolition' theory. Actually, if I remember it correctly, there was no real "pattern" to the blowouts, just random windows going out. And that's how it works. They find an "explanation" that supports their idea, and they show you the video, explaining it "their way", and your mind, having no immediate means to actually question what you're seeing, believes it, until a new idea can be introduced. It's all part of the whole "power of suggestion" concept. However, some people never think to seek a "new idea", whether due to laziness, or just gullibility, so they believe it, unquestioningly. No, you're right. There's no pattern. I love how these videos are all "OMG! repetitive loud noises, they MUST be bombs!" Did anyone ever stop to think that a million tons of cement and steel smashing into the building under it floor by floor would make loud noises with a predictable pattern? Lol, again, that's the power of suggestion. During the time when your mind would be asking "WHAT THE ******** WAS THAT?!" before it can find an answer, an answer is introduced. In this case "that sound, is bombs going off!", and your brain accepts that answer, until a new, more logical answer can be introduced. But, that requires the person to SEEK a new answer, if no one introduces it to them, personally. Basically, anyone who's been convinced that "it was bombs" would probably feel like an idiot when they learn what you just explained, as well as what I explained. But, until they are explained, they believe whatever they've heard, that best answers the questions in their mind. And, in many cases, a "better" answer, never reaches their mind, due to their gullibility, or laziness. And the longer the idea stays in your mind the more convinced you are that it's right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|