|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:21 pm
Hey, has anyone seen War Planets/Shadow Raiders?
Pelvus, of Planet Bone was ways trying to off the king, as that was the accepted method of promotion. Just reminds me of the Sith in general, and I a bit of my character.
"I've never seen an autodoctor with some many antidotes, or so many poisons!"
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:22 pm
yep seen it. it was alright.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:28 pm
i'mma go to bed and such. nighty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 8:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darkened Angel Vice Captain
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 9:16 pm
Reps and Dems are evil.
On the extreme Right, you have little gov intervention in anything, and thus gives rise to anarchy. On the extreme Left, you have heavy gov intervention, and thus gives rise to Socialism.
I say, screw elections. Just have the candidates do a fashion show. None of their speeches matter worth crap since whoever wins is gonna screw us all over anyways, so we might as well just get the one that looks good.
I wanna run for candidacy, JUST to make this national statement:
" My fellow Americans. ******** YOU! * flips off the cameras * Hey, at least I'm not bullshittin' you all. I'm telling you right here and I now that I honestly don't give a rat's a** about any of you. "
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:23 pm
So, who's familiar with the Anarchist's Cookbook?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:59 pm
Heard of it... can't remember it though.
However, I could never become president.... I'd turn it into dictatorship in one day...
I subscribe to the theory of the "perfect ruler", which states the only person fit to rule the country would be the one person who wouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Don't bother picking it up. its pretty inacurate.
it describes recipies for things like explosives and poisons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:10 pm
Oh, formulas I already know and use on a daily basis. What good would a book like that do to someone whose basement looks like Burt Gumers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:15 pm
Im just recomending that you don't pick this one up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:17 pm
Whatever... You and ND talk up a storm though... the last 7 pages have probably 10 posts not made by either one of you two...
Kinda funny actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:24 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:18 pm
Check out what I proved in math:
You guys know the number i? The theoretical square root of -1?
Well according to the math book and teacher, i^2 = -1 just like sq.rt 3^2= 3.
But its not true!!!
I^2 would mean sqrt -1 x sqrt -1.
You can put those two sq rts under the same radical sign so: i^2= radical(-1x-1). Which equals one. So if you're still following, then we have 1 under the radical sign, which = 1.
I win!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:20 pm
Complex equations stopped interesting me since my grade was no longer dependent on them.
Congrats for flying in the face of athority though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
