|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 7:54 pm
First off, Cale's right.
And second, I read frigate as freighter.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 7:57 pm
A Corvette is closer to a freighter than a Frigate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2006 9:46 pm
Yeah.
In order of size it's somethin like this right:
Fighter-Skiff-Yacht-Freighter-Corvette-Frigate-Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 25, 2006 9:05 pm
Technically Corvettes and Frigates are considered Capships too
but in Capships it goes
Corvette
Frigate
Destroyer
Light Cruiser
Strike Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Light Carrier
Strike Carrier
Battlecruiser
Attack Carrier
Fleet Carrier
Battleship
Star Destroyer (Can be considered one of the last two)
Star Dreadnaught ('nuff said)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 2:53 pm
not realy captial ships. Corvettes bridge the gap between fighters and capital ships.
Corvettes can be anywhere from 10-500 people manning the thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 6:23 am
So how about those Eclipse or Soverign Star Destroyers? I never knew such things exsisted until recently they're pretty powerful in comparission to SSD models but their designs are weird in shape, sort of.  Still nice to learn some new things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 7:13 am
They have superlasers, that much I know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 9:33 pm
They are far more powerfal than an SSD. The Eclipse is ungodly powerful, and the Sovereign can handle three of anything...except for maybe the death star...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 28, 2006 10:01 pm
Ah, I remember those from the Dark Empire comics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 2:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:18 pm
Fighting an Eclipse is honestly every commanders nightmare...I've ran it a couple of times, and I always lose...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 29, 2006 9:45 pm
And here's the discrepency.
Executor SDs are often reffered to as Supers.
Any class from Exec up is sometimes called a "Dreadnaught" or a SSD.
So pretty much, Executors, Eclipses, Sovereigns, and anything larger than an ISD can be called an SSD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 30, 2006 2:31 am
FrozenPhoenix32 And here's the discrepency. Executor SDs are often reffered to as Supers. Any class from Exec up is sometimes called a "Dreadnaught" or a SSD. So pretty much, Executors, Eclipses, Sovereigns, and anything larger than an ISD can be called an SSD. That's a good thing to take note of actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 6:03 am
So is the Eclipse a super dreadnaught or something?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 4:03 pm
no, its an Eclipse-class Star Dreadnought.
The Dreadnought replaces Destroyer.
It just means its too big to be a Destroyer, its classified as a Dreadnought.
Most fans prefer to call it an SD because its a generic term for a dagger shaped warship/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
