|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 4:24 pm
Yeah, they have so many types of Star and Super Star Destroyers that it can get confusing once in awhile. xp
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 31, 2006 9:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:32 am
Between a Star Destroyer I and II it can. Between a Star Destroyer and a Super Star Destroyer it aint. It depends what you're looking at exactally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 1:51 pm
What exactly does the designation of a II mean?
Just that it's an update?
So then the GA is probably using VSD VIIIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:05 pm
I do think its an update.
The origional Vic was too slow for pursuit, so the Mark 2 had bigger, faster engines.
Superficially they look the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 5:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:27 pm
Shinn Matsunaga I do think its an update. The origional Vic was too slow for pursuit, so the Mark 2 had bigger, faster engines. Superficially they look the same. That's what I read as well, the arnaments and stuff are the same and all that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 12:31 pm
Robin the Aussie Shinn Matsunaga I do think its an update. The origional Vic was too slow for pursuit, so the Mark 2 had bigger, faster engines. Superficially they look the same. That's what I read as well, the arnaments and stuff are the same and all that. The Mark 2 however has no missles. a tad disapointing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:10 pm
Shinn Matsunaga Robin the Aussie Shinn Matsunaga I do think its an update. The origional Vic was too slow for pursuit, so the Mark 2 had bigger, faster engines. Superficially they look the same. That's what I read as well, the arnaments and stuff are the same and all that. The Mark 2 however has no missles. a tad disapointing. True, however it still has Ion Cannons and Turbo Lasers so it's still decently armed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:32 pm
The ISD I wasn't capable of atmospheric entry right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:34 pm
No. Only the Vic I had the ability to pull that off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:36 pm
well the ISD II could, I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:43 pm
Nope. trust me on that.
She doesnt have the repulsors for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:45 pm
Not that they need it, they can just bombard the s**t outta the planet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 2:54 pm
FrozenPhoenix32 Not that they need it, they can just bombard the s**t outta the planet. hell a mark one could do that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
