|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 3:51 am
rofl
That's a artist.
I guess einstein was a genious. Ore it looks like lol
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 2:17 pm
An artist cannot be a genius? Can you do what a master artist does? Can you even come close?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 4:41 am
divineseraph An artist cannot be a genius? Can you do what a master artist does? Can you even come close? Umm... Thake some bottles of paint, and hit it at the painting. My li'l sister can do that lol I can make it somehow better though. 3nodding Much better... I alredy did 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 7:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:40 am
Exactly, zaki, just don't go off the topic so much, just to post something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 12:08 pm
Whatever happened to the values of humanity,
Whatever happened to the fairness in equality...
I have an adopted brother. =D
Random, and completely irrelevant, I know. xd ~sneaks away~ ninja
☻/
/▌
/
Az says hello!~
Instead of spreading love we're spreading animosity,
Lack of understanding, leading lives away from unity...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2009 12:30 pm
divineseraph That was Thomas Edison, not Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson wrote books, such as "Nature". He's a tough read even for people fluent in the english language, so you may have trouble with it. Here is his poem The Rhodora (Rhodora is a type of flower) On being asked, whence is the flower. In May, when sea-winds pierced our solitudes, I found the fresh Rhodora in the woods, Spreading its leafless blooms in a damp nook, To please the desert and the sluggish brook. The purple petals fallen in the pool Made the black water with their beauty gay; Here might the red-bird come his plumes to cool, And court the flower that cheapens his array. Rhodora! if the sages ask thee why This charm is wasted on the earth and sky, Tell them, dear, that, if eyes were made for seeing, Then beauty is its own excuse for Being; Why thou wert there, O rival of the rose! I never thought to ask; I never knew; But in my simple ignorance suppose The self-same power that brought me there, brought you. Omg! That's beautiful! crying I love the Shakespearan-time way of speaking ^^ why, oh WHY did it have to change?!?! crying And um, may I add my own opinion to this interesting debate? =D A genius: An exceptional natural capacity of intellect, especially as shown in creative and original work in science, art, music, etc.: the genius of Mozart. Also.. A person having an extraordinarily high intelligence rating on a psychological test, as an IQ above 140. So really, anyone can be a genius (as long as they have some skill or talent to call their own, of course) whether artist, poet, scientic brain box, world-renowned computer genius, or whatever. =D I have to admit though, I can relate with Zaki, my own mother and father wouldn't call it being a genius if I became an exceptionally talented painter, or a writer of any sort, I want to be a writer, and most likely, they will discourage it heartily ^^' I don't agree, of course, but hey, it's parents y'know? And especially in South Asian countries, if you try to become ANYTHING like that, you will be ridiculed your entire life, all South Asian parents want their children to become doctors, or businessmen/women when they're older. ^^' It's because they've been taught to survive, and the only way you can do that is with money, so they want +++ jobs for their kids. ^^' Even I, myself have been brought up with this belief that any jobs that don't give enough money are by far superior, but as I've grown, I've realised the complete idiocy in that. ^^ I'd rather contribute something beautiful to society rather than get money for meslef. =D But, as I said, I can relate with both sides of this argument.@Rain: I'm so sorry!!!! crying crying crying I didn't mean to go off topic!!! Sorry ^^'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:22 am
Rania and divine, don't be mean. It's against the guild law. And divine, don't show me porno pictures. No i can't make it, cause it's haram! It's humans, and it's naked people. And dont speak like that, be respectful! And how should u know i am not a porno painter? yes i admit i am not a painter, but i can make more beautiful things. Also Rania, a topic contenues by new topics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 10:35 am
The_Pathan Rania and divine, don't be mean. It's against the guild law. And divine, don't show me porno pictures. No i can't make it, cause it's haram! It's humans, and it's naked people. And dont speak like that, be respectful! And how should u know i am not a porno painter? yes i admit i am not a painter, but i can make more beautiful things. Also Rania, a topic contenues by new topics. I'm sorry, not everybody can do art, zaki. Well, yes everybody can paint, but there is no life, feeling and a meaning in all of them. What that painting shows isn't porn. Different people can judge that pictures on many things, you said it's porn....don't think many agrees with you... But! Yes there aree naked people, you saw it was people, they looked real. Isn't that beautiful? You don't have to agree with me, of course. I would say the picture from denmark of muhamad was art, but the point of it wasn't really good. or, it depends on what the artist thought of when he painted it. Who knows...I don't know him, who cares... So, you can judge a painting on how it looks like, or on the meaning of it. Example, (I just took random pics from internet here...)  Nice, very colorful...but what's the point? Maybe the painter had one, dunno..
But, then, it's these abstract paintings that I personally think are more amazing, and not all of them.
Because, they actually paint feelings and abstract things paper, that is really cool biggrin
Haha, anywaaays, no, nothing, I'm done, I think...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:08 pm
Paintings have a brain effect. Phcygical...(not spelled right)
But that painting is haram. 3nodding
Sorry i must go... And Rania, please dont be soo secular
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:15 pm
The_Pathan Paintings have a brain effect. Phcygical...(not spelled right) But that painting is haram. 3nodding Sorry i must go... And Rania, please dont be soo secular Why, does it hurt you? Is it so? Mr everything-is-haram?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 1:54 pm
what? I never think it's haram.. well, except some nude picture that most artist excused it as "art".
we even use picture to keep the history (except Prophet Muhammad saw.'s picture)
But yes, I guess it's not belong in this thread of "adoption.." sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 12:41 am
Shinigami Vayth what? I never think it's haram.. well, except some nude picture that most artist excused it as "art". we even use picture to keep the history (except Prophet Muhammad saw.'s picture) But yes, I guess it's not belong in this thread of "adoption.." sweatdrop Why are the nude pictures not haram, I really don't get it. Well, for me it is art, and Can someone, please prove why painting muhamad is haram? I mean he's just a normal human like us, and THERE IS places like saudi arabia, where they have "beautiful" pictures of muhamad, why isn't that haram, huh? huh? You, should stop becoming angry on such stupid things. In the end, that's only what I think about things, you don't have to agree with me, I don't have any proofs either, so...these discussions will never end, I guess..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 1:46 am
Easy to answer, if u belive in Allah 3nodding
It's wroten in qur'an that showing Prophet Muhammad(saw) Is haram!
Thats why he is not in The Message either.
And those are humans which is haram, and they aint covered. They even showing their niples, which is 100% haram.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2009 2:31 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
