|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:45 pm
sk8intree Captain Verd Shikalee Ethics and morals are “logical,” but are also based on emotion. Not necessarily. People disagree on morals all the time. Why? Because they're based on personal opinion. Logic is "Bones from dinosaurs have been dated back to 2 million years. Therefore, the world is at least 2 million years old." Logic is not "I like people, therefore people should not be killed." true. i wont kill for the fun of it but if someone were to hurt a friend of mine or try to kill me i would definetly kill them. morals are an opinion But they are VALID, are they NOT? And the be TRUE and VALID are two different things?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:46 pm
sk8intree Shikalee attilathefun Shikalee attilathefun Shikalee A very logical person, I am someone who likes practical and scientific solutions. You are not logical. You have a crush on a comic book character. It's hard to discuss this because it's not really possible to argue about love, just like it's not really possible to argue about God. Okay, attila. Explain your syllogism. How does emotion relate to logic? God ahead. Do it. Explain YOUR logic. Emotion + WHAT = Non logical? And it that something is fictional characters, SUPPORT your observation with EVIDENCE, because your opinion does not dictate what is and is not logic. What is my logic is vastly different than your own. This was discussed throughly in my TOK class. Logic is different per individual based on experience and knowledge. Logic plus emotion equals reason, and to have a valid reason, in all due respect, is to be correct. To be correct is not to be one answer, unless the circumstances call for such. To call someone illogical simply because you do not like them is not logical. Therefore, you're a hypocrite. Emotion is not logic. Emotion is a barrier to logic. Moreover, your post makes very little sense. Please revise. You are obviously very confused. Logic and emotion coexist on a regular basis. That is what makes our decisions “human.” Ethics and morals are “logical,” but are also based on emotion. Saying it does not make it so. I could say you’re a lunatic with purple monkeys flying out of you a** but that doesn’t make it true, either. Your allegation, with no proof, is just as ridiculous. sorry for butting in but here goes.... shikalee is right think about it. pretend you are in a car right. you crash. your friend/relative is bleeding very badly. what goes thru your head? logic: he/she is dying and needs help emotion: i cant bear to see him/her die Thanks. DX At least it's not 3 people attacking me at once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:47 pm
Shikalee sk8intree Captain Verd Shikalee Ethics and morals are “logical,” but are also based on emotion. Not necessarily. People disagree on morals all the time. Why? Because they're based on personal opinion. Logic is "Bones from dinosaurs have been dated back to 2 million years. Therefore, the world is at least 2 million years old." Logic is not "I like people, therefore people should not be killed." true. i wont kill for the fun of it but if someone were to hurt a friend of mine or try to kill me i would definetly kill them. morals are an opinion But they are VALID, are they NOT? And the be TRUE and VALID are two different things? you have a point sweatdrop yeah you are right. depends on whos has the knife and who's about to get stabbed right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:48 pm
Shikalee But she didn't. She just criticized us. She asked no questions. No, she said she was unnerved by it. That's not insulting. I can reply to your other response, because I'm not the one who made the initial statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:49 pm
Shikalee mofoslotmachine Shikalee mofoslotmachine Shikalee Very well. I'd call that a fair statement. But I will say arguing is difficult, and annoying, period. Sorry. I recall "unnerving" relating to someone who is unnerved. Perhaps you should mean something when you say it. Then do so. Yes, I did. It "removed my firmness of purpose". I was about to hit that reply button, but the Shakespeare caught me off guard. Okay, but I hope you know this means we can't be off topic and flirt with each other if I'm concentrating on that instead! How sad that a simple lyric emotionally affects you so much. How powerful Shakespeare’s words are to completely erase your mind of all relevant thoughts to a topic. How sad that you can have a complete concept ready to write, but that seeing some old-fashioned language can throw all your thoughts into some unknown abyss. How tragic. I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, but if it means your intentions are to purposefully annoy me, then you have proven to me that we really can never get along. Do you even actually know what a joke is? neutral My last post was one entire joke. SARCASM DOESN'T ******** WORK ON THE INTERNET? How many goddamn times do you guys have to do that, use a JOKE as an excuse for saying something bitchy, when the reader has no way of knowing it was a joke. I DIDN'T MAKE A BITCHY COMMENT, FOR GOD'S SAKE. I ACCUSED MYSELF OF FLIRTING WITH YOU, WHICH ISN'T AN INSULT. WOW, LOGIC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:49 pm
Otakugyrl And ANOTHER topic to discuss:
Do you think Hidan will realize exactly what he's done right away? Or will he "try again"?
What are your thoughts on what Hidan will do in the next chapter?
As well as what you think the next chapter will involve?
Again, these are just thoughts and other such things. Obviously no one knows EXACTLY what will happen yet... Hidan won't know until he's hit in the back of the head with a brick, me thinks. He's that kind of guy. The only reason I like him. He's awfully charasmatic for an a*****e.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:50 pm
mofoslotmachine Shikalee mofoslotmachine Shikalee mofoslotmachine Shikalee Very well. I'd call that a fair statement. But I will say arguing is difficult, and annoying, period. Sorry. I recall "unnerving" relating to someone who is unnerved. Perhaps you should mean something when you say it. Then do so. Yes, I did. It "removed my firmness of purpose". I was about to hit that reply button, but the Shakespeare caught me off guard. Okay, but I hope you know this means we can't be off topic and flirt with each other if I'm concentrating on that instead! How sad that a simple lyric emotionally affects you so much. How powerful Shakespeare’s words are to completely erase your mind of all relevant thoughts to a topic. How sad that you can have a complete concept ready to write, but that seeing some old-fashioned language can throw all your thoughts into some unknown abyss. How tragic. I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, but if it means your intentions are to purposefully annoy me, then you have proven to me that we really can never get along. Do you even actually know what a joke is? neutral My last post was one entire joke. SARCASM DOESN'T ******** WORK ON THE INTERNET? How many goddamn times do you guys have to do that, use a JOKE as an excuse for saying something bitchy, when the reader has no way of knowing it was a joke. I DIDN'T MAKE A BITCHY COMMENT, FOR GOD'S SAKE. I ACCUSED MYSELF OF FLIRTING WITH YOU, WHICH ISN'T AN INSULT. WOW, LOGIC. ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:51 pm
Juuyonbi_No_Peko_=3 Shikalee Juuyonbi_No_Peko_=3 Shikalee Juuyonbi_No_Peko_=3 me wants next week's chappie =/, or heads are gonna roll =3 I have to go to San Fransisco. Call my dad and ask if it's okay. If I go on the right day, I could get the colored chapter. (Whatever 2-3 pages are colored...) ohoho no no, I want THE chapter coloured, I haven't seen a sprinkle of other colour than black and white He's never done that. I don't see why he'd prefer one of Shikamaru's fights, ALL in color, over Naruto VS Sasuke. proably he was rushing to end that part of the arc, and begin the TJ... We don't know that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:51 pm
Shikalee Otakugyrl And ANOTHER topic to discuss:
Do you think Hidan will realize exactly what he's done right away? Or will he "try again"?
What are your thoughts on what Hidan will do in the next chapter?
As well as what you think the next chapter will involve?
Again, these are just thoughts and other such things. Obviously no one knows EXACTLY what will happen yet... Hidan won't know until he's hit in the back of the head with a brick, me thinks. He's that kind of guy. The only reason I like him. He's awfully charasmatic for an a*****e.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:52 pm
i just want to know how the capsule will be used. also i wanna see something like... naruto killing kakuzus lightning element soul thing w/ his new move
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:52 pm
Captain Verd Shikalee But she didn't. She just criticized us. She asked no questions. No, she said she was unnerved by it. That's not insulting. I can reply to your other response, because I'm not the one who made the initial statement. No, she said this was the strangest thread she'd ever seen. It was CLEARLY with a tone. Though you can't type such on the internet, I'm sure she can pretend she wasn't censuring me and looking down on me because I'm some "hopeless fangirl" who is too dumb to help liking someone. YES, that's an ASSUMPTION, but it JUSTIFIES my response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:52 pm
Shikalee Otakugyrl And ANOTHER topic to discuss:
Do you think Hidan will realize exactly what he's done right away? Or will he "try again"?
What are your thoughts on what Hidan will do in the next chapter?
As well as what you think the next chapter will involve?
Again, these are just thoughts and other such things. Obviously no one knows EXACTLY what will happen yet... Hidan won't know until he's hit in the back of the head with a brick, me thinks. He's that kind of guy. The only reason I like him. He's awfully charasmatic for an a*****e. xDDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 20, 2006 2:53 pm
sk8intree Shikalee sk8intree Captain Verd Shikalee Ethics and morals are “logical,” but are also based on emotion. Not necessarily. People disagree on morals all the time. Why? Because they're based on personal opinion. Logic is "Bones from dinosaurs have been dated back to 2 million years. Therefore, the world is at least 2 million years old." Logic is not "I like people, therefore people should not be killed." true. i wont kill for the fun of it but if someone were to hurt a friend of mine or try to kill me i would definetly kill them. morals are an opinion But they are VALID, are they NOT? And the be TRUE and VALID are two different things? you have a point sweatdrop yeah you are right. depends on whos has the knife and who's about to get stabbed right? Exactly. It's RELATIVE so it's pretty much pointless to argue over. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
