Welcome to Gaia! ::

+ The Official 'Got Goth?' Guild +

Back to Guilds

 

Tags: goth, subculture, alternative 

Reply ~ Main Forum ~
Pale skin is now 'in' Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Pick your poison.
  Sunblock.
  Parasol.
  BOTH!
View Results

Miss Distance

PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 5:58 pm
Pale skin is beautiful to me...I carry an umbrella everywhere =D  
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2008 9:07 pm
Am I the only one who feels a tad wary of the tone of this forum. I'm naturally skeptical and distrusting of anything presented at face value. But I really hope the overall tone here is not to put up pale skin while putting down dark skin. I sort of understand where you're comming from but at the same time, most of you don' t come from a community where girls are desperately trying to look as Anglo as they can. Hydroquinine is the Black girl's version of the white girls tan addiction. While tanning darkens the skin and potentially causes cancer, hydroquinine, a skin bleaching agent has been banned in many countries (not the US)because it can potentially cause liver failure and severe skin dammage as well. I'm just saying, things like skin color and hair texture an be potentially volatile. subjects. Pale skin may be beautiful but on the same token, is this the inference that dark skin is ugly? I surely hope not. It sounds like those who are tan are even apologizing for NOT being pale because they spend time in the sun.

No one should HAVE to explan their skin color. Yes tanning is a bad idea, but be really careful what you say about someone's skin color, Those of you who are pale take this feat as some sort of great achievement. That kind of thinking is potentially dangerous. I mean, what if I were to open up a thread about how great it is to have dark brown skin, I'm sure it might come across as strange because it seems that No one would actually want to be as Dark as Alek Wek. It seems as if dark women are beautiful in SPITE of their skin tone and not because of it, where as the fair skin is considered part of a packaged deal in a lighter person. I'm just saying, re-asses your thinking a bit. What does that say about yourself and your concept of beauty? Would you really find yourself less attractive if you woke up tomorrow morning two shades darker than you are now? If so why?  

Naztakuan


Ametrin

PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 1:46 am
I am content with my naturally pale skin but I think if I had naturally darker skin it wouldn't bother me either... I don't really think it matters; and as for standards of beauty, these are different for difrerent persons but I personally think that there are beautiful people among people of all skin shades. The skin shade doesn't play a big role in if I find a person attractive or not, it's rather their facial features, and the charm of their whole personality what makes me find a person attractive.  
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2008 11:33 am
Luz Melian
I am content with my naturally pale skin but I think if I had naturally darker skin it wouldn't bother me either... I don't really think it matters; and as for standards of beauty, these are different for difrerent persons but I personally think that there are beautiful people among people of all skin shades. The skin shade doesn't play a big role in if I find a person attractive or not, it's rather their facial features, and the charm of their whole personality what makes me find a person attractive.


As in what? A pixie nose and tiny lips? Remember that can be a slipery slope as well. People put Halle Berry up on a pedestal because she has very small features. But everyone thinks Alek Wek is ugly because her nose is wide and her lips are big. Many black girls look like this and are shamed because of it. So called "delicate" features as the ideal is also a very narrow measure of beauty which has always been the Anglo standard. Jewish girls get nose jobs, Korean girls get eyelid surgery. Why? Because of a very narrow concept of beauty dictated by a eurocentric media powerhouse. Ever wonder WHY Michael jackson got all those nose jobs in conjunction with bleaching his skin?
So when people say "features", I think only of those undersold black barbies. If I am a dark individual with kinky afro hair , a wide nose and large lips, I wouldn't expect most men to give me a second look. Black or white. However, according to the black hierarchy, I'm one of the good looking ones. My nose is narrow, my lips are bow like and my skin "ain't slave dark" However my hair is kinky and nappy and I refuse to have it processed straight. For you it's a fashion thing. For me it's a political/feminist thing. Out of all the ethnic groups on the planet, we are considered the ugliest. And the black woman is at the very very bottom. Our hair needs to be staightened, our skin must be lighter, our lips are too big, our hips are too wide, our noses are too wide. Nothing about our natural state is acceptable. You wouldn't believe the negative programming that has to be undone by our mothers or grandmothers with that rediculous concept of "good hair" that led them to justify putting burning chemicals on their child's head from the age of 4. I was lucky to be raised in a home of bohemians where I actually like my hair. But my peers weren't so fortunate.

I'm only saying this because as a goth room, the scene is always going to be dominated by those of euorpean decent and their experiences. Perhaps that's why it's somehow acceptable to post an entire thread on a skin shade and not expect any in depth discussion as to why the OP felt it necessary to post a thread on such a alienating topic. Did she know what the social rammifications were or was she being niave about the entire subject? Pale skin will never have the same political and socio economic rammifications of dark skin. People don't assume you're stupid, a criminal, or sexually promiscuous for having pale skin. People actually second guess my ethnic origins because I don't fit the stereotypes. That perhaps I couldn't possibly be black if I spoke this well, and acted like I had class. As if such a thing is synonymous. People only think of pale skin a sickly because ..corpses and sick people are pale. That's a sound educated assesment, it's out of concern for your wellbeing no matter how uneeded. I wish I had that kind of concern from people. Concern from your fellow man is nothing to complain about. It's better than being left to die of an illness because someone ligther than you gets top medical priority at a hospital.  

Naztakuan


littlegirlrai

PostPosted: Sun May 25, 2008 4:55 pm
I am pale. People sometimes would say stuff, but not really. The way I dressed usually let people know that I wanted to be pale. If anyone did ask I would let them know that I liked the look. I would also let them know that I didn't want skin cancer or to look like a leather hand bag in ten years.

The trends like that come and go all the time. It used to be fashionable to be pale, because it meant that you got to sit around inside. It meant that you didn't have to work out in the fields. It also used to be fashionable to be fat, It meant you were well feed. I'm pretty sure that being stick thin and ultra tan is a new concept. All trends have their ups and downs though...The only thing that almost always stays constant is the .7 ratio. It is a ratio having to do with the wait size compared to the hip size.  
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 7:14 am
I used the be the ''brownest'' of all the people I knew when I was young but since Im a vegetarian I cant get brown anymore, sun doesnt like me not eating meat O_O and I do not like the sun to be closedminded about the vegetarians <_< *sends hate to the sun*  

Blije


Veruniel
Crew

PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 11:40 am
Naztakuan
Am I the only one who feels a tad wary of the tone of this forum. I'm naturally skeptical and distrusting of anything presented at face value. But I really hope the overall tone here is not to put up pale skin while putting down dark skin.

I know how you feel. I certainly didn't mean to put down any skin colour at all when I started this thread.

I think any skin colour can look good as long as it's natural. I've known goths with dark skin, goths with light skin and goths with tanned skin. They're all beautiful (and that goes for non-goths too), but with one exception.

I cannot stand it when people who don't tan naturally -- that is, are really pale and tend to just burn, flake off, and look white again underneath -- try to get that 'perfect' bronzed skin tone. It either ends up looking fake when they go to a tanning salon, or is dangerous when they bake in the sun for hours on end and turn their skin into leather but still don't look much darker than when they started.

Just as I think dark skin should be valued, I think naturally pale skin should be valued as well. I don't like the idea that light skin is in any way better, but it does make me happy to see that these days it's becoming more fashionably acceptable to be really pale and not try to tan. It means that northern Europeans like me will be less likely to get themselves skin cancer.  
PostPosted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:58 pm
I don't usually like when people obsess or make a priority out of their skin tone.
The people don't bug me, but I just don't get it.
Like, "I'm going to tan unill my skin is orange and not actually tan."

I also don't like when little 9th grade gothlings who usually know you
to be paler and kind of in your clique see you after you get back from
freaking Mexico and make fun of how tan you are, as if you're going to be embarrassed.

I do tan really, really easily, but I'm usually not actually spending time outside
enough to get that way, so instead I get really, really pale.

I am really glad that it's being more accepted, though.
Mostly as far as making fun of people in school goes.
rolleyes
 

x_apathyslastkiss


Henneth Annun
Captain

PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 5:39 pm
Naztakuan
Am I the only one who feels a tad wary of the tone of this forum. I'm naturally skeptical and distrusting of anything presented at face value. But I really hope the overall tone here is not to put up pale skin while putting down dark skin. I sort of understand where you're comming from but at the same time, most of you don' t come from a community where girls are desperately trying to look as Anglo as they can. Hydroquinine is the Black girl's version of the white girls tan addiction. While tanning darkens the skin and potentially causes cancer, hydroquinine, a skin bleaching agent has been banned in many countries (not the US)because it can potentially cause liver failure and severe skin dammage as well. I'm just saying, things like skin color and hair texture an be potentially volatile. subjects. Pale skin may be beautiful but on the same token, is this the inference that dark skin is ugly? I surely hope not. It sounds like those who are tan are even apologizing for NOT being pale because they spend time in the sun.

No one should HAVE to explan their skin color. Yes tanning is a bad idea, but be really careful what you say about someone's skin color, Those of you who are pale take this feat as some sort of great achievement. That kind of thinking is potentially dangerous. I mean, what if I were to open up a thread about how great it is to have dark brown skin, I'm sure it might come across as strange because it seems that No one would actually want to be as Dark as Alek Wek. It seems as if dark women are beautiful in SPITE of their skin tone and not because of it, where as the fair skin is considered part of a packaged deal in a lighter person. I'm just saying, re-asses your thinking a bit. What does that say about yourself and your concept of beauty? Would you really find yourself less attractive if you woke up tomorrow morning two shades darker than you are now? If so why?
I'm not trying to put people with a darker skin colour down or anything...There's an idea out there that pale skin is ugly and I'm just saying I don't agree, I think that's what the thread was responding to.

All colours look nice. 3nodding It doesn't really effect anything except for vitamin D absorption and what hair/makeup/clothing colours look the best on you.  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 9:04 pm
Baby sunscreen. it't got the higher spf  

Gaylord Mule 3


Spooky Wasabi Princess

Proxy Risk-Taker

14,850 Points
  • Perfect Attendance 400
  • Tested Practitioner 250
  • Magical Girl 50
PostPosted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:24 am
I've started putting lemon juice on my skin to lighten it. It actually works! Woo!  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:04 pm
I hate my skin because I'm fair but I tan like a motherf**ker. An hour and a half in the sun I went from pale to a golden brown! I'm officially tan! GAH! One of my coworkers was impressed that I was so pale and tanned without so much as a burn. It's not my favourite aspect of myself.  

Laharl Part Deux


Lady_Tenebrae

PostPosted: Mon Jun 16, 2008 2:11 am
I've always been pale, when you take a picture of me the flash reflects off me and I like glow lol. Funny cuz the rest of my family has a more olive skin-tone. Anyway, I like to be pale, so to keep it that way I now use SPF 50 Sunblock and a whitening cream lol. I don't seem to get much lighter (don't know if it's possible) but it at least keeps me the tone I'm at.  
PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:49 am
I have pale skin and anyways have
I hate the sun
O.O;;  

MissHorrorstar


The Goth Apple

Dapper Dabbler

14,000 Points
  • Member 100
  • Citizen 200
  • Gaian 50
PostPosted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:08 pm
This is more than a bit hypocritical of me because of the effort I put into keeping myself pale, but I think the important part is to look natural. If you naturally have a deep skin tone, then you probably will look better in it than any other. Same goes for if you're naturally pale. If you spend alot of time outside and get a dark brown tan, that can be worn attractively. Or really frighteningly, but that goes for any tone.
The important thing is to look natural about it. Brown and toasted is natural and can be attractive with the right hair, face shape and makeup.
Bright orange is not natural, not pretty, and not healthy. It can only be truly attained in a tanning booth, which means you invested money and time into looking unnatural and unhealthy.
I, myself feel prettier when I'm paler. I am aware what anyone else does with their own skin is their own business, but it's very hard for me to not make snarky comments about people who have dyed themselves orange. It's hard for me not to make snarky comments about anyone. I'm working on that, to very little effect.
 
Reply
~ Main Forum ~

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 7 8 9 10 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum