Does this sentence make sense?

[Tonberry Teh Haxxor]

You may drive alone with your provisional license, as long as you do not been accidents or traffic violations. The following restrictions apply after you are licensed

I copied and pasted from my online Driver's license test website.  

[Niccea Majeare]

Nope it is incorrect

I think it could rephrased:

, as long as you do not have any accidents or traffic violations.

or

, as long as you have not been in any accidents or have past traffic violations.


It really depends on what the sentence is trying to say.  

[Tonberry Teh Haxxor]

Niccea Majeare

Nope it is incorrect

I think it could rephrased:

, as long as you do not have any accidents or traffic violations.

or

, as long as you have not been in any accidents or have past traffic violations.


It really depends on what the sentence is trying to say.

I didn't think so, I just think it's weird that it is phrased like that.  

[Niccea Majeare]

Many things that are sponsored by the state have such errors. It is really embarrassing. There were so many errors in a state test I had to take a couple of years ago. Many of us had trouble completing the test because we were laughing. ((It was an English/Writing test))  

[jangab]

I believe it should be phrased in this manner:
as long as you have not been in any accidents and have not violated traffic rules...
Anyway, it can have many variations...
-JanGab  

[iJazzy]

Yeah, that makes no sense at all. xd  

[Error Access Denied]

It confuses me. confused Don't people proof read anymore? xp