|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:29 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 2:13 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:32 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
xStephanx Lol, I've met members of the Luton Vampire Society. Nutters, the lot of them. I mean, vampires are potentially cool story devices but I wouldn't base my life on them. What 3 did you pick? I'd say Interview With The Vampire and the Blade movies were good.
I think I should've used the term "great" rather than "good".
My three? The original 1922 Murnau "Nosferatu", the 2001 animated short-feature "Blood: The Last Vampire" (running at only 45 minutes, including the closing credits), and the 2000 film "Shadow of the Vampire".
This isn't to say that I dislike all other vampire films- I do make a distinction between "great" and "entertaining". A great film is intelligent, artistically motivated, and well-produced. An entertaining film isn't essentially bad, and they can very well be good, but a lack of one of the previously mentioned features keeps it from being great. I was entertained by the Blade films, the first Underworld movie, The Hunger, and a handful of others.
To be more distinct-
Total Vampire films seen ~ 50 Number of them I'd consider great = 3 Number I'd consider entertaining, and good ~ 10 Number I'd consider bad ~ The rest
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:47 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
GilAskan xStephanx Lol, I've met members of the Luton Vampire Society. Nutters, the lot of them. I mean, vampires are potentially cool story devices but I wouldn't base my life on them. What 3 did you pick? I'd say Interview With The Vampire and the Blade movies were good. I think I should've used the term "great" rather than "good". My three? The original 1922 Murnau "Nosferatu", the 2001 animated short-feature "Blood: The Last Vampire" (running at only 45 minutes, including the closing credits), and the 2000 film "Shadow of the Vampire". This isn't to say that I dislike all other vampire films- I do make a distinction between "great" and "entertaining". A great film is intelligent, artistically motivated, and well-produced. An entertaining film isn't essentially bad, and they can very well be good, but a lack of one of the previously mentioned features keeps it from being great. I was entertained by the Blade films, the first Underworld movie, The Hunger, and a handful of others. To be more distinct- Total Vampire films seen ~ 50 Number of them I'd consider great = 3 Number I'd consider entertaining, and good ~ 10 Number I'd consider bad ~ The rest I'm glad that's entirely clear now. I love overly precise casual chatter.
I haven't heard anything about this but it sounds rather good. I disliked Underworld, it was silly.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|