|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:17 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:38 pm
|
|
|
|
Zimmian Zisk >.> I still play second edition. anything else gets too complicated, and adds too many ways to twink a character. what fun is it to attack 6 times every round, always strike first, get critical hits half the time, never fumble, and deal damage to anything that touches you? not that fun. but with a good DM second edition is godly.
If you like uncomplicated, 4.0 might be something to try. I was a 5 year veteran of 3.5 and I'm still learning the new rules, since they've changed them so much. They took a lot off of the Star Wars d20 system (don't know if you've ever played it) and some of the most striking things are you only get one attack unless one of your abilities gives you multiple, abilities are broken down into at will, once per encounter, or once per day, and they've reduced the class options down to seven I think, but they're releasing four more in the next PHB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 8:47 pm
|
|
|
|
ciran87 Zimmian Zisk >.> I still play second edition. anything else gets too complicated, and adds too many ways to twink a character. what fun is it to attack 6 times every round, always strike first, get critical hits half the time, never fumble, and deal damage to anything that touches you? not that fun. but with a good DM second edition is godly. If you like uncomplicated, 4.0 might be something to try. I was a 5 year veteran of 3.5 and I'm still learning the new rules, since they've changed them so much. They took a lot off of the Star Wars d20 system (don't know if you've ever played it) and some of the most striking things are you only get one attack unless one of your abilities gives you multiple, abilities are broken down into at will, once per encounter, or once per day, and they've reduced the class options down to seven I think, but they're releasing four more in the next PHB.
as long as I don't need figurines or a dozen different things to reference constantly, I will like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 9:29 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:59 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chocolate Banana Smoothie
|
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 10:23 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 5:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:19 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:26 am
|
|
|
|
I play a mixture of 1st Edition and DnD Advanced (2nd). I play some 3.5 now, too, because my sis's fiancee has 50 of the books you can get for it (I'm not kidding...).
I've been playing since I was 7, and I've had the same character. She's only level four, but the characters level up slowly in 1st edition and my Dad was a mean DM. And she's a magic-user (sorceress, now).
My Dad had a character who was a bard named Bwana and he had some kind of enchantment that gave him permanent shocking grasp.
But he didn't tell us that, he just kept saying not to touch his hands and giving us funny looks. Until the paladin tried to shake his hand...
One particularly awesome thing about my sorceress, Gabrielle, is that I was lucky enough to get a pseudodragon as my familiar. The pseudodragon's name is actually Sorceress, always has been, but I regret converting her to 3.5 because she lost her near-invisibility and now only has partial chameleon.
She is my saving grace because she has more hitpoints than I do. Magic-users are weak, so when I had 4HP to call my own at first level, her extra 17 really helped. And I still only have 16HP at 4th level. *sigh*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|