|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:09 pm
did you think that breaking dawn needed more of edward and bella romance time or did you want more action and conflict and less of the wolves thinking towards each? i personally thought that it needed more action and a better ending and sooo much less of the wolves just thinking that was really boring! although i liked the parts were edward and bella had romance time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:14 pm
yeah i agree i think that there needed to be more action and less of random wolf thoughts ! and breaking dawn hardly had a conflict! the majority of it was just edward and bella getting down. gosh people control yourselves! and the ending was so lame! nothing even happened!!!!!!!!! yeah so yeah thats about it eek eek eek
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:26 am
i don't know.. breaking dawn was even less than new moon, the book i least liked before breaking dawn. so yeah, i don't want no old, dead guy and young girl snogging and then the horrible monstrosity of narrating how to give birth. good lord. i wonder how jacob stomached that scene. i would have probably fainted, barfed, or just shot myself. the only thing i liked about breaking dawn was jacob's part. everything else was crap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:41 am
I didnt like that the story was told from Jacobs point of view.... It really threw me off. Other then that I loved it. I never saw the whole baby thing coming. And as a young mother myself I totaly related to "some" of Bella's situations..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:18 pm
I think it would have been nice to have a little more of both, but I still love Breaking Dawn just the way it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 2:47 pm
I think it wouldve been better if there was more action =/ The closest thing to action was Bella chopping the block. It needed more of a conflict like that other person said. It ticked me off also that the Volturi practically came for nothing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 24, 2008 7:28 pm
there was waaaaaay too much romance in that book. with all the sex and the lovey dovey between bella and edward, then jacob imprinting on whatsherface (renesme) and emmett being all like "at least someone's scoring around here" with bella-- way too much. and then stephenie goes and builds up this whole fight scene between the volturi and the cullens, and nothing happens. it was total s**t, just stephenie trying to do what she thought the audience wanted, not what wouldve gone well in the book. so yeah, there shouldve been more action, more people dying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 25, 2008 8:13 am
Eerie_Whisperer there was waaaaaay too much romance in that book. with all the sex and the lovey dovey between bella and edward, then jacob imprinting on whatsherface (renesme) and emmett being all like "at least someone's scoring around here" with bella-- way too much. and then stephenie goes and builds up this whole fight scene between the volturi and the cullens, and nothing happens. it was total s**t, just stephenie trying to do what she thought the audience wanted, not what wouldve gone well in the book. so yeah, there shouldve been more action, more people dying. I CONCUR COMPLETELY!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:24 am
Eerie_Whisperer there was waaaaaay too much romance in that book. with all the sex and the lovey dovey between bella and edward, then jacob imprinting on whatsherface (renesme) and emmett being all like "at least someone's scoring around here" with bella-- way too much. and then stephenie goes and builds up this whole fight scene between the volturi and the cullens, and nothing happens. it was total s**t, just stephenie trying to do what she thought the audience wanted, not what wouldve gone well in the book. so yeah, there shouldve been more action, more people dying. finally, someone understood!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|