PiercedPixie2
I didnt misread anything, i just didnt copy the whole damn article into my thingy.
It was only partial. There was a continuing part, hence my URL.
PiercedPixie2
1) Yes, he was getting death threats in Netherlands, because all he wants to do is create animosity.
If creating animosity is stating your opinion (incorrect or not), then that's pretty pathetic. My question is, it is all just hate speech? Because there is nasty aspects to islam, exaggerated or not. Not every religion is perfect, and Islam is not above that.
PiercedPixie2
2) Where did you see that?
it's in my URL that i posted earlier, which was a continuation of your article.
But i shall place quotes from that article for your viewing.
Quote:
Van Gogh, with Hirsi Ali, had recently made the film "Submission," a 10-minute movie that the two said depicted the abuse of women in Islamic cultures. After van Gogh's murder, the Dutch government placed public figures known for their anti-Muslim stances in safehouses.
Quote:
Though he refuses to claim the mantle of van Gogh's successor, Wilders clearly sees himself as continuing the controversial filmmaker's work. He acknowledges the similarities between "Submission" and his own 10-minute work, about five minutes of which have been completed, he said.
PiercedPixie2
3) Yes he did get help from Professors and scholars, but im sure it was just help on quotes and passages from the Qur'an.
Be sure. Don't assume. I would like to see evidence based on this. Because it really depends on who he talks to and how he presents his info if it could be considered "hate movie" or a documentary.
Also, haven't really seen anything about USA banning such stuff. We've already got quite a few video documentary-could be considered biased hate movies floating around concerning Islam.
PiercedPixie2
Did you see the part where 'Four months ago, he called for the Koran to be outlawed in the Netherlands.' Does that sound like he is the most open minded person? No it doesn't sound open-minded, but I'd rather see his video first and judge later rather than just prejudging him based on a statement.
PiercedPixie2
To be honest, he's right ring - so i automatically dislike him.
I am a socialist/democrat. Sorry. [/quot] So what? Does that mean because I'm more conservative and I am from an independent party that I'm not supposed to like liberals republicans democrats or whatever?
Automatically disliking someone because of their political preference, that's prejudging too. There's some people, some liberals that I've taken disliking to prematurely because they were liberals, but once i looked more into their policies, i found that I liked them.
...I really don't understand the logic of your statement right there.
