Celebrity News - Who cares?

[black_wing_angel]

MayIHelpYou22102

black_wing_angel

Fresnel

You know what'll solve this problem once and for all? A papparazzo finally sneaks into someone's house to get a picture and gets shotgun'd in the face for home invasion. That'll be the first real message that they need to start backing the ******** down.

My thoughts, exactly.

And if it doesn't clear the water for ALL celebrities, they sure as ******** won't be spying on that guy.

Although, let's face it, there would be a shitstorm of controversy over "*Celebrity* IS A MURDERER!" and other such asshattery.

"Not even. Chances are the b*****d got a picture with the celebrity with a shot gun and the police "accidentally" leaks it to the media. rolleyes Paparazzi already instigate fights so they have an angry picture of a celebrity."

That assumes the camera survives to be taken by police. When a shotgun meets a camera, the shotgun ALWAYS wins.

That also assumes the police choose to take evidence. All they need to know is that it's the Celebrity's property, and the "visitor" did not have permission to enter the perimeter.

Most likely, that would be enough to get them off, no charges.  

[GREEEEEEEEEEEN]

Hell to the NO.

I got too much s**t goin' on in my own life to give a damn about someone on a newspaper that people tell me to care about. I'll care about whoever I want to care about.  

[Fresnel]

black_wing_angel

MayIHelpYou22102

black_wing_angel

Fresnel

You know what'll solve this problem once and for all? A papparazzo finally sneaks into someone's house to get a picture and gets shotgun'd in the face for home invasion. That'll be the first real message that they need to start backing the ******** down.

My thoughts, exactly.

And if it doesn't clear the water for ALL celebrities, they sure as ******** won't be spying on that guy.

Although, let's face it, there would be a shitstorm of controversy over "*Celebrity* IS A MURDERER!" and other such asshattery.

"Not even. Chances are the b*****d got a picture with the celebrity with a shot gun and the police "accidentally" leaks it to the media. rolleyes Paparazzi already instigate fights so they have an angry picture of a celebrity."

That assumes the camera survives to be taken by police. When a shotgun meets a camera, the shotgun ALWAYS wins.

That also assumes the police choose to take evidence. All they need to know is that it's the Celebrity's property, and the "visitor" did not have permission to enter the perimeter.

Most likely, that would be enough to get them off, no charges.

Either that or the dude shotguns the camera just to make sure. I would. ******** be takin' pictures of me...