Modern Warfare 2 Vs. Battle Field BC 2

[Lt Gigglebottom]

Ok so this issue has been going on for quite a while with some people saying that Modern Warfare 2 is better then Bad Company 2 and others saying that Bad Company 2 is better the Modern Warfare 2. But honestly i think it's stupid for most of the community to compare the two games when they're practically two totally different games. Here's why I think so.

Just because both are shooter games doesn't mean you can compare. Modern Warfare is a full on fast paced, rambo style FPS, that's it. While Bad Company 2 on the other hand is half that which involves using tanks, helicopters, and I think a few other things. It is usually a slow paced match with some matches lasting up to almost an hour long at the most.


That's why i don't think they should be compared to one another. But if i'm wrong then feel free to tell me so. Other wise i would like to hear your opinions on the subject.  

[Kunx the Mighty]

Still waiting on a New Dark Forces game.  

[Niaxus]

I don't see the point in arguing over fps games...
I can play an fps game all day every day seven days a week and not see any clear difference between them other then game play (slightly) and graphics (slightly)...
Its all basically the same objective yes? "shoot the other guy" ... both games are good in different ways so why try to prove why the fifty dollars you wasted were any more well wasted then your friends?  

[Lt Gigglebottom]

Niaxus

I don't see the point in arguing over fps games...
I can play an fps game all day every day seven days a week and not see any clear difference between them other then game play (slightly) and graphics (slightly)...
Its all basically the same objective yes? "shoot the other guy" ... both games are good in different ways so why try to prove why the fifty dollars you wasted were any more well wasted then your friends?

Thank you by god!! But to me i think in game play some can be a little more different then the other average fps. I'm just sayin.