|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:05 pm
To build up our tolerance for 'txt tlk'. Honestly, I think most of us here sound a little up tight. Especially me. The first thing that goes through my mind when I read 'txt tlk' is, 'illiterate idiot'. I can tolerate it, and I won't admit to the person that they're typing skills make me think of them as stupid, and a bit lazy, but I mean, jeezus. I don't mind it as much with younger kids, but when a 13, 14, 15, etc year old, or even an ADULT comes online, and speaks like 25% of their keys on the keyboard aren't working, or like they didn't pass the first grade, I go crazy. I think I can do it. I think I NEED to do it. Do you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 4:36 am
No, I don't think I shall take you up on that. I prefer to surround myself with people that I like, or least can tolerate, whether that be in real life or online. Hence why I joined this guild. I'm not a Grammar-Nazi. I just prefer to be in an environment that I enjoy. If they choose to txt-talk out there, so be it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 6:57 am
They're the ones typing like idiotic boobs, and I don't think I should have to accomodate the stupidity.
Don't get me wrong: kudos to you for wanting to open-minded! But I for one don't want to become more tolerant of the degeneration of the English language.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 04, 2007 9:19 am
I don't think I could stand that. D;
Good luck, though! ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:39 pm
raineoftears No, I don't think I shall take you up on that. I prefer to surround myself with people that I like, or least can tolerate, whether that be in real life or online. Hence why I joined this guild. I'm not a Grammar-Nazi. I just prefer to be in an environment that I enjoy. If they choose to txt-talk out there, so be it. Here-here. I joined here to get AWAY from the text-talking nonsense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 12:46 pm
I used to go to the Chatterbox just to bump relentlessly. I haven't been there in a long while. I do think, though, that the Chatterbox then was a better place for more coherent random conversations compared to the state the GD is in now gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 23, 2007 6:38 pm
applecyder I used to go to the Chatterbox just to bump relentlessly. I haven't been there in a long while. I do think, though, that the Chatterbox then was a better place for more coherent random conversations compared to the state the GD is in now gonk I second that. CB isn't what it used to be and now GD is filled with porn trolls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:19 am
Honestly, I think an hour in the GD is just as effective. And not as scarry as chatterbox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:43 am
Sometimes there are some interesting conversations in the chatterbox... and many times the A/M/C is more frightening o.o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:13 pm
Is it actually a tolerance for 'txt tlk' that you're looking to build up, JUST INspire me? It sounds more like what you want to do is build up a tolerance for the people who use it.
If you're looking to give people the benefit of the doubt, to expand your experiences to the point where you aren't thinking "illiterate idiot" every time you see someone using 'txt tlk', then I definitely don't think you'll want to spend time in the Chatterbox. I think that spending time in the Chatterbox will only reinforce your current opinions and not lead you to form new ones.
The problem I see with going to the Chatterbox is that, in order to overcome your preconceptions, you'd need to be exposed to someone who is not an idiot and yet still uses 'txt tlk'. Now I know many people who are both intelligent and who use 'txt tlk'; however, these people are unlikely, in the extreme, to use Internet abbreviations when engaging in serious discourse.
Why don't they? Because they realize that if you want to show that you are taking a discussion seriously, then you should also want to show that you are putting time and consideration into your responses. Using 'txt tlk', given that it came into use to speed up written real-time conversations that were taking place on-line or via phone, hardly shows that time or consideration are going into your responses. In fact, even an intelligent response, if written in text-talk, will seem hurried and unconsidered - often coming off as though the author is just regurgitating things they've heard elsewhere instead of formulating their own opinions.
Are we uptight? Of course we are. Anyone who holds tightly to any belief is going to seem uptight to people who either don't hold the same beliefs or who harbour a more moderate view on the issue. I'm willing to allow a certain amount of text-talk in specific situations, especially if time is a factor in responding to what people are saying (IM sessions, cell phone text messages), but I definitely do not believe that it deserves a place on Gaia. If that makes me uptight, so be it. Then again, I'm probably uptight about a lot of things: my views on rape, child molestation, my belief that kittens are the best snack food ever.
Tolerating people is one thing; tolerating people while they're doing something I disagree with or believe to be wrong, that's something else all together.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:36 pm
I play online games. I think that builds up my tolerance more than the chatterbox ever could. And by tolerance, I mean the ability to not correct it and simply cringe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:16 pm
|| Pyrite || To the original poster: Don't bother, why spend your time in the presence of something you dislike? You found out you dislike it because you were exposed to it in the first place.
To Mammon: You rock my world.
|| Lacuna ex a stultus puella ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 2:56 pm
I really think honestly that that is a stupid thing to do. Some people have other things to do in life than spend an hour on the computer typing and tolerating "text talk". Some of us have a life you know. I mean I encourage people to support good grammar on the Internet, but some times I just cannot deal with those people that are too lazy to type in syllables and sentences. I am not saying that it is a bad idea or anything but in my opinion it is not the best thing to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 7:13 pm
Everyone takes their grammar differently. I personally don't go around trying to correct everyone I meet because I do feel accepting of the way others choose to type online. Sure, some things really bother me, but I'm sure I do things that other people find annoying as well. It also depends on how we all treat others. Honestly, I'd prefer to befriend a nice person who talks "lyke this" than a jerk who types with perfect grammar. As long as we don't go around degrading others, I don't think it's really a problem. I don't look down upon people with bad spelling and grammar unless their personality gives me a reason to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2007 10:03 pm
No offense but I refuse to waste time being exposed to kids text talking to each other gaining some so called tolerance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|