Welcome to Gaia! ::

Twilight - The Book, by Stephenie Meyer

Back to Guilds

 

 

Reply Twilight - The Book, by Stephenie Meyer
The Twilight Lexicon's Manifesto

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Do you agree with the Lexicon's admins & mods?
  Yes, I agree with everything they said about the characters.
  For the most part, yes. There are just a few things I disagree with.
  For the most part, no. There are just a few things I agree with.
  No, I don't agree with anything they said about any of the characters.
View Results

Jasmic
Vice Captain

Shy Phantom

PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:23 pm
I don't know if we have any regular Lexicon attendees here, but if you are one, I'm sure you noticed the manifesto the mods put up back in November.
The original post is located here and here.

Anyway, I just wanted to know what your thoughts were on the arguments the admins and mods made about the main characters (bolded in this post). Personally, I agree with all of them, and on a side note, have always found Alphie and Pel to have much better skill in defending Jacob than I.

But this isn't just about Jacob. And (shock!) this isn't just about Edward. Or Bella. Or any individual character for that matter. To everyone who's ever claimed they desperately hated any of the Twilight characters, here is the Lexicon's manifesto that rebukes it. Disagree? Give your two cents here. But please, PLEASE don't just flame. Posts like, "THEY R SO WRONG JACOB SUCKS EDWARD RULEZ!!1!" are big no-no's. Support your arguments. Be respectful. That's all I ask.

That said, here's part of the manifesto, copied and pasted straight from the links above:


Alphie, Pel and the rest of the Lexicon admin and mod team
Once upon a time Alphie, Imogen, and Pel started a website just for fun and were amazed that 5 months later 500 people had come to hang out, to post, and to relish in Twilight and the upcoming New Moon. Flash-forward to events within the next calendar year: major influxes of membership causing the bandwith to be blown at least three times, membership over 10,000 and climbing, PM’s and emails go from 3 a day to 3 an hour and hundreds in a week.

What we are basically saying here, is that our small, little, intimate website grew beyond what we had ever imagined was possible in the course of a year. Sometimes what works on a site of 500 doesn’t work on a site of 5,000. When we had 500 people, it was a lot easier for people to get a flavor of the site without having to post lots of posting regulations. Our original rules didn’t even mention netspeak, or set banner heights because we never imagined that those things couldn’t be dealt with one-on-one.

Since March 28, 2006 (a mere 20 months ago ) we’ve had a variety of changes. Some of these changes include: incorporating a language filter, deleting a games forum, overhauling the Hollywood Hideout twice and then totally closing it down and reinventing it, having mods be the only ones who can start discussions topics…the list goes on. With each of these changes we have undoubtedly lost membership, kept others from leaving, and for others still these changes were neither here nor there.

We are now faced with a realization that the fandom is so large that the Lexicon just can’t be everything for everybody. Whereas, we are happy that people like coming here to play and discuss what is our favorite obsession, but at a certain point there is a vision that the admins have regarding the intention, vision, and direction of the books (one that is also shared by our moderators) that we are comfortable with. We are not saying that you can’t have an alternate opinion, impression, gut feeling. What we are saying is that as a matter of personal preference of the administrators of this site, we are a site that supports what we consider to be basic authorial intent.

How do we decide what basic authorial intent is? Check out our personal correspondence, listen to Q&A’s from various signings, look at posts actually made by the author on this site. And, yes, this is our biased, preferential view of where we think the books are going based on those factors and to a certain extent our own gut instincts.

Is the counterargument the above “you’re trying to tell us what we should think”, “you’re limiting what we can feel”, “you’re limiting free speech”, “you’re not allowing for individual impression”. The answer is what your reaction/feelings/impressions are remain your own. If we have any control on that, then we missed the omnipotence memo. However, what we do control is our personal site content, direction, and vision. As this is a privately owned site, with no membership fee, we retain that right.

If you find this unsatisfying and you want something else, the more power to you. There are a ton of Twilight websites out there have different focuses. There is room for even more particularly character focused ones.

So here it is folks, our “manifesto” of sorts, inspired by The Sugar Quill’s affirmations http://www.sugarquill.net/index.php?action=spew ( a Harry Potter fan site with similar issues ). Effective immediately, the items below are a given, they are non-debatable, they are not up for discussion on this site, period.

Bella is not a slut, a tease, a doormat, wimp, or a Mary Sue. She is a teenager who was raised by two loving, yet dysfunctional parents. She is intelligent, she stands up for what she wants when it is really important to her, she is generally non-confrontational unless she is backed into a corner. Like many normal women, she found herself caught between two loves before she fully realized what was happening. She loves both Edward and Jacob, but in different ways, and she sincerely cares what happens to each of them. If despite all this you think Bella is a horrible teenage role-model and she doesn’t have a place in current YA fiction, you are on the wrong website.

Jacob is not a rapist, a potential wife-beater, or a sadist. He truly loves Bella and is convinced that she is going to end up as a vampire appetizer or worse. He did not attempt date rape. He kissed Bella having been on the receiving end of mixed signals, and stopped once she made it clear she was not pleased. He made a mistake, he was sorry, he and Bella have both moved on. He is not likely to make this mistake in the future with Bella or any other girl for that matter. Jacob has good reasons for disliking vampires and wishing that Bella would hang on to her humanity. If despite all this you see Jacob’s every action as horrible and think that he ought to drown whilst cliff diving, you are on the wrong website.

Edward is not a misogynist, a chauvinist pig, or a potential wife-beater (ironic how much he and Jacob have in common). He truly loves Bella and is perpetually stunned that she doesn’t think he is a monster. He has moments of being a control-freak, but this is because he is convinced that she will lose her life at the hands of an out-of-control werewolf or the Volturi. He has good reasons for these fears and would do anything, including laying down his own life to protect her. If the fact that Edward is a bit of a control freak totally turns you off to the point that his every action is called into question, you are on the wrong website.

Jacob and Edward (as well as their respective werewolf and vampire communities) have good reasons for distrusting each other. At the same time, they don’t give each other enough credit until the end of Eclipse. We hope this newfound truce continues, although we admit it is very painful for Jacob given his feelings for Bella.

Charlie and Renee are in no danger of winning the Parent of the Year Award, but they both love their daughter. They have her best interests at heart even if they both at times could stand to grow up a bit themselves.

Emmett is big and strong. He is from rural America. He has a happy-go-lucky personality, and is brutally honest in a good-natured way. None of the above makes him stupid. He gets straight A’s and has been to college several times.

Rosalie is vain and a bit arrogant as well as being beautiful. She likes to dress in high fashion and be admired. She is not however a slut prone to wearing trashy clothing.

Alice sees things, but she can’t always see everything and is fallible. She loves Bella as a sister, not as just a life-sized, dress-up doll.

Carlisle does not just randomly bite people. He does not have a God complex. If he did, he’d have taken on Victoria by biting the entire town of Forks instead of negotiating with werewolves.

Jasper has the most trouble controlling his thirst. This does not mean that he lives for the day when he will find Bella alone and eat her as a midday snack.

Esme is a cool stay-at-home mom. If you think that being a mother is not real work, or that she’s less of a modern woman because she chooses to do this, then you need to leave the website before Alphie or Pel dismembers you faster than you can say Laurent.


There are certain non-disputable romantic relationships (AKA ships) that this site has up for discussion as to their dynamics. Their existence is not up for discussion. We will be steering clear of discussions along the lines of “What if Edward had fallen for Esme instead?” or “What if Edward and Jacob had the hots for each other?” Some of these relationships are as follows: Edward/Bella, Jacob/Bella (for a time in Eclipse and now that love is still held by Jacob but is unrequited.) Jasper/Alice, Emmett/Rosalie, Carlisle/Esme, Sam/Emily and any other imprinted couple where the imprintee reciprocates the imprinter's romantic feelings. Please notice that we are giving Bella/Jacob fans their fair shake, but we stand firmly behind Bella’s choice to be with Edward at the end of Eclipse.

Lastly, does this all mean that we want only people who love every aspect of Twilight 100% to be here? No. (Although certainly you are entitled to think whatever you want.)

Pel freely admits that Emmett doesn’t really appeal to her, she feels that there are moments that Alice reminds her of the Energizer Bunny and needs a time out, and that she wasn’t that into the Eclipse chapter featuring the werewolf history. However, you won’t find Pel on the Emmett threads trying to convince others that they shouldn’t waste their time exploring his character. Next you won’t find her on Alice visions threads talking about how Alice is really just manipulating Edward and Bella to suit her own ends with her visions. Lastly, Pel won’t be visiting the Legends thread and asserting everyone knows that if Stephenie just had a better editor at her disposal that chapter would have been at least 2,000 words shorter.

Alphie would make a list similar to Pel’s, but is too worried that she will spoil something in the process. She can admit to being personally biased that Eclipse is the best book in the series and nearly perfect in every way, but has willingly allowed conversations of flaws and near hatred on the site for a while now simply to accommodate different opinions.

So, after what is probably far more than anyone wanted to read, that’s where we stand. In light of the above there are certain threads that are now locked, and some threads that will be redirected. If that causes anyone to say “this site is not for me”, that’s a price we are willing to pay. Best wishes on finding a place where you will be satisfied.
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:44 am
Thanks for posting this.

I say... more power to 'em. Yeah, it IS THEIR website! They can do whatever they want to! If they don't want people coming on their site trashing characters, they have every right to discipline or ban them! I actually think they're being nice about it all...  

FlixiePixie


IceKittyeKat

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:18 am
True It is their website, but if people are merely mad at a character and view them in a different light then that's their deal. If anything they should be handling this in a more graceful matter without offending to many people. I don't use the website myself. But if some one would answer a question I have that would be nice. (no I'm not trying to be a smart arse but I would like to know the FULL situation.)

If I were to post something like this:

Man I can't believe how stupid and horny Bella can act sometimes in Eclipse. Seriously that is SO Mary Sue-ish. Poor Edward loves her so much that he cleans up after her mess anyways. And JACOB gah, love the character, but still man to be like that. WoW.


*** ReMeMbEr*** This was just an example.

Would something like this get me kicked off? If only the one post?

Oh and good for them for Filtering some words. I wish Gaia would do that more.  
PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 6:16 am
I think it is wonderful that they are filtering words and like Ice said, "Oh and good for them for Filtering some words. I wish Gaia would do that more." I don't really see the problem with them controlling the website. It is theirs after all. As for the opinion perspective? I think they should have a separate forum for those who aren't to thrilled with the characters. Call it the "Bash" forum or something like that. But my hats off to them for keeping their site clean. smile  

xxAlicexCullenxx


Jasmic
Vice Captain

Shy Phantom

PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:14 am
IceKittyeKat
True It is their website, but if people are merely mad at a character and view them in a different light then that's their deal. If anything they should be handling this in a more graceful matter without offending to many people. I don't use the website myself. But if some one would answer a question I have that would be nice. (no I'm not trying to be a smart arse but I would like to know the FULL situation.)

If I were to post something like this:

Man I can't believe how stupid and horny Bella can act sometimes in Eclipse. Seriously that is SO Mary Sue-ish. Poor Edward loves her so much that he cleans up after her mess anyways. And JACOB gah, love the character, but still man to be like that. WoW.


*** ReMeMbEr*** This was just an example.

Would something like this get me kicked off? If only the one post?

I'm assuming since they still have their "Which Character Do You Dislike" thread, they still accept people critiquing the characters. After all, the Sparkling in the Sun forum would not (and actually...is not) flourish without debate. I think what they were trying to say is to not go overboard and push your views on other people. As said here:

Quote:
Pel freely admits that Emmett doesn’t really appeal to her, she feels that there are moments that Alice reminds her of the Energizer Bunny and needs a time out, and that she wasn’t that into the Eclipse chapter featuring the werewolf history. However, you won’t find Pel on the Emmett threads trying to convince others that they shouldn’t waste their time exploring his character. Next you won’t find her on Alice visions threads talking about how Alice is really just manipulating Edward and Bella to suit her own ends with her visions. Lastly, Pel won’t be visiting the Legends thread and asserting everyone knows that if Stephenie just had a better editor at her disposal that chapter would have been at least 2,000 words shorter.
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 8:17 pm
Ah! Thank you so much for clearing that up for me. In that case I support them. Like Alice said


Quote:
But my hats off to them for keeping their site clean.


See if were someting silly like that. Well then i might have a problem. If your just completely hating on a character and won't let up. I say kick them off.
 

IceKittyeKat


Fifii

PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:47 pm
twilight bump  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:11 am
Honestly I think these are pretty good restrictions  

Xenologista

Reply
Twilight - The Book, by Stephenie Meyer

 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum