|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:00 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
I want to say a few things:
1. We have a subforum for rants specifically already. Yeah... I know no one goes there, but that's how things are until Jameka or someone with equal pull in the guild says otherwise. This thread will be moved there tomorrow (so that you know we didn't just delete it).
2. Please never ever disrespect Scott Cunningham or assume that his information is wrong simply because he wasn't initiated to your liking. His books are as valuable of information as a 10 millionth degree initiate. Also, I can assure you that many people whom are initiated into much higher ranks couldn't hold a candle to his knowledge of Wicca OR the intelligent manner in which he conveys his knowledge.
I don't agree with the whole initiation idea, but I won't disrespect your beliefs about it and I won't argue with you about it because I honestly could care less, but I don't want to hear about how someone is less reliable unless they're initiated to the ____ degree (especially when it's someone as respectable as Scott Cunningham).
3. Don't knock religioustolerance.org either. They may not be completely and utterly reliable, but everyone is fallible. For people whom only gathered information without any actual experience, they did pretty well. When I was first learning about Paganism, I read the ENTIRE site (it took forever, too) and understood things pretty well, considering I hadn't heard any of this information a day prior to it.
Anyway, I guess I'm trying to say that "denouncing" things that are critical components for the understanding of those who are just starting out or those who would just like more information altogether is a bad idea. Now if these sources were blatant lies that were solely intending to make Pagans look bad (or even if they did so accidentally), then I might reconsider, but as far as the sources I covered, I'm putting my foot down.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:32 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 3:39 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
Guess what? "Wicca" had grown beyond its original boundaries, much like Christianity has outgrown its boundaries.
That 'original' or 'real' Wicca you're talking about is to current Wicca what the Catholic church is to current Christianity. The precursor, sure. The one that started it, sure. The only one? Not by a long shot.
Stop parroting what other people have told you and look at the world around you. These people are part of a religion they call Wicca. They've organized it, legalized it (and yes, legally, they are Wiccans and not just impostors or wannabes) and made it grow. That may be where the name came from. That may be where the idea came from. However, it has grown larger than that.
And a question: This particular, organized religion- what would you call it, if not wicca? There's a name for Gardnerian wicca already. But the larger, more modern version has no other name than Wicca; and I imagine that even if you could find a name to suit it, convincing people to change the name of their very real religion would be rather difficult.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:07 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:34 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
Gawqueenpenguin Milendil All Wiccan's are Pagan because Pagan just means anyone who is not a Christian, Muslim, or Jew. All Wiccan's are witches, but not every witch is Wiccan. Pagan (sorry getting offended a bit because i consider myself a purist pagan) is Not JUST someone who is not " a Christian, Muslim, or Jew " because then that would include Buddhism and really Buddhism is not pagan. nor are alot of non Christian, Muslim or Jewish faiths. Pagan means in the strictest form: a person or community that follows the beliefs of a polytheistic (many gods) religion. and Wicca yes started a while ago but has grown. It is a Young religion that is learning what it really should be. do you think the Christians had the bible all set up in less than 50 years HA no. do you think they had their set belief system set in stone not really but they did have a base... You believed Jesus was gods only son sent to earth to save your soul. Wicca is still young but the base definition that any one who considers them self wiccan can agree on is that wicca is Nature based practices that follow pre Christian religions and gods. don't be so strict with one of the most accepting religions out there. Do not claim someone is not Wiccan because they have yet to go through some rite or passage, or you might as well become the Catholic church. Uh, no. Wicca is a fertility cult that is oathbound and requires sex in the initiation. Gardner stated that, so therefore anything else is completely wrong. And have you looked in a dictionary? The first definition says that Pagan means anyone who is not Christian, Muslim, or Jew. So technically, Buddhists and Taoists and all the others are Pagan.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 8:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|