|
|
.357 Mag. or .30-30 Win.? |
.357 Magnum |
|
60% |
[ 3 ] |
.30-30 Winchester |
|
40% |
[ 2 ] |
|
Total Votes : 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 2:45 pm
|
|
|
|
Okay, supposed to say I got a lever-action rifle, I wonder which chambering would be better for me. The choices are between the .30-30 and the .357 and both have advantages and disadvantages.
I would want to use the rifle in an all-purpose role from fun target shooting to possibly small game, defense against animals both four- and two-legged, maybe huinting, and whatever else would need shooting in environments from the middle of the woods to suburban areas.
The .357 would be able to hold between eight and ten rounds compared to the .30-30's between five and seven. The .357 could also chamber .38s for cheaper target practice. And the revolver I want is in .357 so I could buy one ammo for two guns. Recoil would be lighter as well.
On the other hand, the .30-30 would have a better range. The effective range of a .357 L-A is, according to various websites, only about 100 meters compared to the .30-30's 150-200. And, I dunno, I kind of want my first rifle to be in a rifle caliber.
EDIT: Okay, now I'm reading that 100 meters is about the maximum range for .357 and that's with hot-loaded .357s. I kind of want more range than that.
But in a home defense role the rifle round would have more penetration than would be safe, possible going through walls and into people's homes. Not that I ever expect to have to use it in such a role while having Camellia, but it's something to consider.
There's also expense. I believe .30-30 is more expensive than .357 and I know it's more than .38 Spl. But I really don't shoot so often as to make that such an issue.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 3:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 10:35 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 8:16 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 2:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 7:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 7:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 5:41 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:39 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:38 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:56 am
|
|
|
|
Felix H. Riboruba Fresnel Remember, "effective range", like "speed limit", is a suggestion. I've shot my Buckmark .22LR pistol at 300 meters into a steel bear, and hits were 50/50. That's pretty good. Yeah, that was at Whittington. Had to aim halfway up the damned mountain to hit it. I expect if the sights had been on, I would have done much better. Also, at age 10, my accuracy was bullshit if I wasn't sandbagging it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|