|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:19 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 1:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 3:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VampirePrincessOftheNorth
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:52 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 5:13 am
|
|
|
|
When I saw the movie, I sat there and was like, "Uh, that's really gay-looking. They could have tried a little harder." I was talking with my sister after the movie (on the way to drop her off at ther house (long story as to way she doesn't live with me)) and I brught this up. Her response was "I thought the same thing. I mean, sparkling is gay anyway, but it looked like they just sat there a threw glitter at his face. *Pretends to throw glitter happily*" So, on Monday, I get this really random call from one of my aunts, who I'm not particularly close to. I was the one who got her into Twilight (like I did to half of my family). So she says shes on break but she just had to call me and tell me what her friend said. So, they were talking about the movie and her friend says, "He's supposed to sparkle like dimonds, not look like he's about to go march in a gay pride parade." Everyone around them looked and was like, "Okay, I don't know what she's talking about, but that was the funniest thing I've ever heard."
Yeah, so, long story short, I think that they'll have better graphics for the next movie because they'll have a lot more money. Twilight was just a tester for the other movies to see how they'd do it they made them. That's why they didn't say there were going to make another movie until after Twilight made, like, 80 mil in the first two days. The next one's graphics will be better. Let's hope that if they put the sparling that it looks better, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:03 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 3:34 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:15 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 2:34 pm
|
|
|
|
Fataldragoncheese VampirePrincessOftheNorth Okay you guys are going to hate me for this I know. When I first started reading the series when it first came out I was so amazed at it all. I was so excited to see the movie because I know that they can't make a movie completely like a book. Just shut up about the movie being terrible. It stuck to the story line and didn't stray like other movies ( the clique for instance) just be thank ful that they didnt kill everyone and that Edward didnt go all sadistic. For the funding that they had for the movie I felt that they did the book justice and it was awesome in my opinion. Also they even said that they cant consolidate the book into a two hour movie it physically cant be done. Yes some parts were stupid but others were drop dead funny. that is my opinion and you guys can freely hate me now i don't hate you i agree, i liked the movie , it was better than i expected, but just his non-sparklyness was kind of annoying. hey, im critical, who cares! I really liked the movie as well. The meadow scene and the sparkley edward were not as I imagined they would be :[. It was dissapointing but I loved the rest of the movie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|