|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:36 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:47 am
 |
|
|
 |
Well I honestly liked the movie, although it has some disappointing moments
it certainly picks them up again and puts them all to good use.
Worth watching, yeah I really think it is, it's just one of those movies
It would be a shame to miss out on ^_^
I think this quote is quite accurate :
Quote: As Stephen King fans should probably know, there are a lot of things in Stephen Kings books that make sense only where they are - that is, in Stephen King books. Translating them to film is usually a bad idea, as many filmmakers who had adapted King's books before probably figured out. But along comes Lawrence Kasdan, a talented and acclaimed veteran director, who, with the aid of a no less acclaimed screenwriter William Goldman, decides while writing a script for Dreamcathcer that it would be better to bring along all the trademark King's weird goings-on - and voila! We have a movie filled with telepathy, butt-ripping aliens, crazy military types keen on killing everyone, telephone-guns, indian symbols and even a lot of CGI thrown in for a good measure. Of course, it all fails - but oh how gloriously! I'll go as far as to state that Dreamcatcher is absolutely the best unintentional B-movie trashfest in years!
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:22 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
