|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:33 pm
|
|
|
|
Okay, so if you aren't familiar with the prospect of Universal Unitarians, I highly suggest that you read up on their basic tenets.
Now, my question is whether they are too liberally-minded. I mean, they kinda through out the Baby Jesus with the bathwater-turned-into-wine. The basic theology rejects the divinity of Christ, the reality of any miracles, and so on and so forth. Essentially, it is the organization for humanism while still retaining the trappings of communal worship.
My question is, does drawing from too large of a body of mythos -- from literally any religion -- does it detract from the depth of meaning and study? What think you, gentle liberals?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:21 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:33 pm
|
|
|
|
rmcdra deadmanjay rmcdra I really think they are too broad. They're nice people and all but the UU, or at least the one I attended, seemed to be lacking in the spirituality department. As a social movement group they're great but they really don't seem to have anything spiritual going for them and I believe this broadness without a mythos focus can actually hinder spiritual growth, by reducing religions to mere philosophies. Did they tell you that they are very spiritual people and very open minded to everyones beliefs? I am sorry, but some beliefs are just messed up. The whole raping children then have your coven rape them. Eww I don't think there were any Frosts there. I was church shopping at the time and I did not really understand Gnosticism or Christianity and it seemed like the only place I would fit in. Luckily my fiancée set me straight. It only took her 1 service to tell that it was a dead place.
Although all the ones I have met seem to be huggy/touchy people, the lack of genuine research into even history is stifling to me. I don't mind listening to what someone may believe, but if it sounds like bullshit, then my mind will start singing show tunes or something. That probably means I am close minded in somes eyes, but really, at least watch the history channel, as innacurate about things as they may be. There are some truths to what they show.
For the record, i am not a huggy person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:37 pm
|
|
|
|
deadmanjay rmcdra deadmanjay rmcdra I really think they are too broad. They're nice people and all but the UU, or at least the one I attended, seemed to be lacking in the spirituality department. As a social movement group they're great but they really don't seem to have anything spiritual going for them and I believe this broadness without a mythos focus can actually hinder spiritual growth, by reducing religions to mere philosophies. Did they tell you that they are very spiritual people and very open minded to everyones beliefs? I am sorry, but some beliefs are just messed up. The whole raping children then have your coven rape them. Eww I don't think there were any Frosts there. I was church shopping at the time and I did not really understand Gnosticism or Christianity and it seemed like the only place I would fit in. Luckily my fiancée set me straight. It only took her 1 service to tell that it was a dead place. Although all the ones I have met seem to be huggy/touchy people, the lack of genuine research into even history is stifling to me. I don't mind listening to what someone may believe, but if it sounds like bullshit, then my mind will start singing show tunes or something. That probably means I am close minded in somes eyes, but really, at least watch the history channel, as innacurate about things as they may be. There are some truths to what they show. For the record, i am not a huggy person. I know right? I mean if you're going to be a bit on the eclectic side at least do some ******** research in what you're taking. I didn't get to know any UUs that well I only attend 3 services and after my fiancée attended and didn't want to come back, I stopped attending too. I think the only thing we really like about them was that they supported gay rights and some other social causes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:41 pm
|
|
|
|
rmcdra deadmanjay rmcdra deadmanjay rmcdra I really think they are too broad. They're nice people and all but the UU, or at least the one I attended, seemed to be lacking in the spirituality department. As a social movement group they're great but they really don't seem to have anything spiritual going for them and I believe this broadness without a mythos focus can actually hinder spiritual growth, by reducing religions to mere philosophies. Did they tell you that they are very spiritual people and very open minded to everyones beliefs? I am sorry, but some beliefs are just messed up. The whole raping children then have your coven rape them. Eww I don't think there were any Frosts there. I was church shopping at the time and I did not really understand Gnosticism or Christianity and it seemed like the only place I would fit in. Luckily my fiancée set me straight. It only took her 1 service to tell that it was a dead place. Although all the ones I have met seem to be huggy/touchy people, the lack of genuine research into even history is stifling to me. I don't mind listening to what someone may believe, but if it sounds like bullshit, then my mind will start singing show tunes or something. That probably means I am close minded in somes eyes, but really, at least watch the history channel, as innacurate about things as they may be. There are some truths to what they show. For the record, i am not a huggy person.I know right? I mean if you're going to be a bit on the eclectic side at least do some ******** research in what you're taking. I didn't get to know any UUs that well I only attend 3 services and after my fiancée attended and didn't want to come back, I stopped attending too. I think the only thing we really like about them was that they supported gay rights and some other social causes.
But not all of them do support gay rights. I know of at least two who helped some spiritualists try to oust these two gay men from a supposed learning camp. They said the men molested young boys and everything. I spent hours with these two men, and nothing ever happened to me, just like every male around my age and younger were ready to testify to that. As a whole, they might be, but like in every group, there are some pretty shitty people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:50 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:54 am
|
|
|
|
rmcdra I really think they are too broad. They're nice people and all but the UU, or at least the one I attended, seemed to be lacking in the spirituality department. As a social movement group they're great but they really don't seem to have anything spiritual going for them and I believe this broadness without a mythos focus can actually hinder spiritual growth, by reducing religions to mere philosophies. Agreed. The history of the UU is from two separate Christian movements, the Universalists and the Unitarians, the first of which believed that all religions were fundamentally the same, and the second one rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. Unfortunately, the movements both were perpetrated by more than a slight iconoclastic bent, which they ended up smashing any association with Christianity, and set itself aside as basically a watered-down social club.
Sure, they're not Christians, but they don't have a mythos to their own, like, at all. I just don't know how effective a religion can be if it doesn't have the software necessary to back up the individual's search for spirituality. Sure, they encourage individual search, but there's not really any guidance at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:20 pm
|
|
|
|
Boxy rmcdra I really think they are too broad. They're nice people and all but the UU, or at least the one I attended, seemed to be lacking in the spirituality department. As a social movement group they're great but they really don't seem to have anything spiritual going for them and I believe this broadness without a mythos focus can actually hinder spiritual growth, by reducing religions to mere philosophies.Agreed. The history of the UU is from two separate Christian movements, the Universalists and the Unitarians, the first of which believed that all religions were fundamentally the same, and the second one rejected the doctrine of the Trinity. Unfortunately, the movements both were perpetrated by more than a slight iconoclastic bent, which they ended up smashing any association with Christianity, and set itself aside as basically a watered-down social club. Sure, they're not Christians, but they don't have a mythos to their own, like, at all. I just don't know how effective a religion can be if it doesn't have the software necessary to back up the individual's search for spirituality. Sure, they encourage individual search, but there's not really any guidance at all. I know it's like, okay there's a watering hole now go do something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 2:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:47 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:46 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|