|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 11:41 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:33 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 12:51 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:00 pm
|
|
|
|
Krissim Klaw I've always liked a definition for anthropomorphism along the lines of- Attribution of human motivation, characteristics, or behavior to non humans such as inanimate objects, animals, or natural phenomena. This means an anthro could potentially be a rock, piece of wood, animal, or some fantasy creature. [...]As for hybrids it is a fine line verging on semantics. A hybrid isn't a human. Just like a mule is neither a horse nor a donkey. Thus since a hybrid isn't human it wouldn't bother me to here someone say that their hybrid is anthropomorphic.
Given your definition above, let me ask you a question: would you consider a stereotypical anime cat girl, whose only animal feature is that she has cat ears (and maybe a tail), anthro?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:05 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 1:35 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 3:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Well, I say that they are anthro, because to me, something furry is something that isn't entirely human, nor entirely animal. If it's a normal furry (Aka, a humanoid animal), or a halfie, like a centaur, lamina, or harpy, then it's a furry :3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:07 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:23 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 7:56 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 02, 2009 8:42 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 6:13 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 8:12 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 12:37 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|