Ok so this issue has been going on for quite a while with some people saying that Modern Warfare 2 is better then Bad Company 2 and others saying that Bad Company 2 is better the Modern Warfare 2. But honestly i think it's stupid for most of the community to compare the two games when they're practically two totally different games. Here's why I think so.
Just because both are shooter games doesn't mean you can compare. Modern Warfare is a full on fast paced, rambo style FPS, that's it. While Bad Company 2 on the other hand is half that which involves using tanks, helicopters, and I think a few other things. It is usually a slow paced match with some matches lasting up to almost an hour long at the most.
That's why i don't think they should be compared to one another. But if i'm wrong then feel free to tell me so. Other wise i would like to hear your opinions on the subject.
The Gamers Promised Land, Gaia's Best Gaming and Pop Culture
Gaia's best guild for discussions and contests about Video Games, Pop Culture, general geek stuff, and any kind of discussion!
Reply | ||||||
|
|