Anthro Dragons...

[Dumnezeirea]

I heart em
=3

Sincerely,


Sorry... the temptation to do this was killing me x3  

[0ntogeny]

scalies :3  

[[-Erik-]]

Lizards :U  

[Cassidy Peterson]

One of my characters is a leezurd 3nodding I don't have any actual dragon characters, though. Would be neat to have one surprised  

[Serph Bravin]

As a fellow anthro dragon, I would like to say, HELL YEAH!  

[Fortune Mysthia]

I am the dragon... 'Nuff said.  

[sadow_wolf2010]

My fiance is a dragon but he looks more like a lion irl.  

[Mr Drak]

Me Big Lizard [: !
But me no Dragon ._.
But me love dragons [: !  

[Memorex_TDK]

My character is a dragon, but I'm no scalie. heart sweatdrop  

[Xx_Hanyuu-San_xX]

lol

I find it funny how Dragon scallies always claim to be Furries. dramallama

A furry must have some sort of "Skin" or "Fur" scales do not count nor does human skin/flesh.

There for it is a Scallie because it has Scales.
And or anthropomorphic because it lacks fur.

Before claiming to not or to be something I think people need to stop smoking weed, and look up the proper deffinition of "Furry"/"Scaly/Anthro"

lol dramallama

Anytime now, someone is going to read this and reply calling it uncalled for and or saying I'm bashing and other nonsense/gibberish.

dramallama  

[Cassidy Peterson]

666 Demonic Lover 666

I find it funny how Dragon scallies always claim to be Furries. dramallama

Because "furry" is a generic term that vaguely describes the person's interests and a fandom they belong to, not the individual.

The actual dragon might be a scaly, but scalies are still part of the furry fandom.  

[Xx_Hanyuu-San_xX]

Cassidy Peterson

666 Demonic Lover 666

I find it funny how Dragon scallies always claim to be Furries. dramallama

Because "furry" is a generic term that vaguely describes the person's interests and a fandom they belong to, not the individual.

The actual dragon might be a scaly, but scalies are still part of the furry fandom.

No they are not.

Fandom is word with many categories and sub categories.

Furry is one.

Scaly is another.

Anthropomorphism is again another.

Saying a Dragon is furry and not scaly is like saying Obama is black and not white, which is what 99.9% of people do.  

[Memorex_TDK]

666 Demonic Lover 666

No they are not.

Fandom is word with many categories and sub categories.

Furry is one.

Scaly is another.

Anthropomorphism is again another....

You have a point: Non-furry furries
Anthropomorphic creatures that are also considered to be furry (even with the lack of pelt or fur) include (but are not limited to): dragons and lizards (also known as scalies and herps, respectively), Cetaceans (dolphins and Orcas), birds and gryphons (also known as featheries or avians), and taurs (centaurs being the prime example). *working definition from Wikifur*

But under the branch of people who consider themselves "furries," Scalies, Featheries, fish...(ies? )" They all hold some sort of affiliation with an animal, therefore the general public refers to all sorts of these people affiliated to animals as "furries." I hope that makes sense. heart sweatdrop  

[Gotherine Foxx]

people have opinions of them and sometimes look like this


 

[Cassidy Peterson]

666 Demonic Lover 666

Saying a Dragon is furry and not scaly is like saying Obama is black and not white, which is what 99.9% of people do.

I'm not saying a dragon is not scaly, I'm saying dragons shouldn't be excluded from the general concept of furry, because for many people the lack of fur is just a technicality. There are also people who are unaware of the scaly/feathery distinction, and people like me who thinks it's unnecessary because the point still gets across.

And if you're talking about just the fandom, saying a dragon can't be a furry is like saying a guy in a hockey shirt can't be a baseball fan.