|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 9:08 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 12:37 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:05 am
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
Recon_Ninja_985 I posted the weapon on a few threads like over a month ago. its not exactly a mateba. its not semi auto. the only trait it carries over from the mateba is it's low bore axis which gives some awesome control when firing the weapon. another feature that is different about the rhino is it's flatness in the frame and cylinder alike. and all everything that can catch on clothing is pretty much smoothed out with the shape of it. it's made to be as easy and convenient to carry as an auto. which is what the shape of it tries to mimic. ive wanted one for a while now however IMHO I believe the mateba action was fine the way it was... it worked fine. thats one of the main things that made it "unique" in the first place. you cant really jam or ******** up trying to shoot while OOB with a revolver because that s**t just doesnt happen with them. so making it semi auto was pure genius Except you lose both the inherent reliability of a revolver AND the high capacity of a semi. The saying goes "I'd rather have six rounds of 'definitely' than fifteen rounds of 'maybe'." The Mateba was six rounds of maybe. In the event of an FTF, the gun would jam. Standard revolvers don't jam on an FTF, they function just like normal, except without a bang. It was a great idea, but it really was the worst of both worlds.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:19 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:01 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 10:34 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:25 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 1:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:14 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:00 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:14 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
Smokestack Lightning Fresnel I think you missed one of the key characteristics of the Desert Eagle. It's heavy, it's powerful, it holds seven rounds, it's huge, it kicks like a monster, it costs more than a small car, and it jams a lot. rofl A Mateba costs much more than a DEagle and Mateba fails because it has this nasty little issue of needing a specific amount of pressure to operate the action meaning if there's a cartridge that's loaded with less powder it isn't going to cycle. A .357 DEagle will always be more reliable than a .357 Mateba. After watching my shooting buddy stovepipe his .44 DEagle seven or eight times in a box of fifty rounds, I wouldn't even trust a DEagle for putting holes in paper. Lots of guns need a specific pressure. Not many jam once a magazine.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b3_p.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:57 pm
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/posts/say/say_b1_p.gif) |
Fresnel Smokestack Lightning Fresnel I think you missed one of the key characteristics of the Desert Eagle. It's heavy, it's powerful, it holds seven rounds, it's huge, it kicks like a monster, it costs more than a small car, and it jams a lot. rofl A Mateba costs much more than a DEagle and Mateba fails because it has this nasty little issue of needing a specific amount of pressure to operate the action meaning if there's a cartridge that's loaded with less powder it isn't going to cycle. A .357 DEagle will always be more reliable than a .357 Mateba. After watching my shooting buddy stovepipe his .44 DEagle seven or eight times in a box of fifty rounds, I wouldn't even trust a DEagle for putting holes in paper. Lots of guns need a specific pressure. Not many jam once a magazine. That's because it was a .44 DEagle, notorious for epic failure unless you feed .44 AMP ammo into it. A .357 DEagle works perfectly fine as long as you don't limp hand it.
I wouldn't place my heart in Mateba. Their parts are no longer made and it's too damn expensive. It doesn't have the research and development that .357 DEagle had.
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/s.gif) |
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![](//graphics.gaiaonline.com/images/template/s.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|