|
|
dream 1911? |
Nighthawk |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Dan Wesson |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Para |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
Springfield |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
S&W |
|
10% |
[ 1 ] |
Colt |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
Sig Sauer |
|
20% |
[ 2 ] |
Kimber |
|
40% |
[ 4 ] |
Ed Brown |
|
10% |
[ 1 ] |
Wilson |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:45 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:58 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:54 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:02 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:23 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Recon_Ninja_985 Requiem in Mortis I'd love to get an original Colt M1911, but I'd be just as happy to get a Springfield or S&W model as well. Hell, I'd settle for any M1911 model, so long as it's not that ******** DEagle-brand M1911. I refuse to buy anything Magnum Research has sullied. I wasnt even aware that magnum research built one o.o "DEagle brand 1911" spawned "DEagle brand DEagle". looks like a gag poster.
I watched some vids of them and saw a review just now.
they seem like a decent pistol for the money. http://www.gunblast.com/DesertEagle1911.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:38 pm
|
|
|
|
Fresnel <******** yeah Dan Wesson. Also, you missed Taurus. I've seen good things done with their 1911's also: Personally, I'd never buy a Nighthawk. I mean, ******** seriously, what justifies a Nighthawk being a $3000 gun when Kimber sits comfortably on the $1000 mark? meh, its kind of hit and miss with taurus.
you might get one that works awesome in every aspect, and another guy might get one that's jacked up. ejection problems,sight issues,etc it can be a good range gun im sure, but not anything I'd trust my life to
if you have one that happens to be a good example from the factory then by all means, carry that sucker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 2:41 pm
|
|
|
|
Recon_Ninja_985 Fresnel Recon_Ninja_985 Requiem in Mortis I'd love to get an original Colt M1911, but I'd be just as happy to get a Springfield or S&W model as well. Hell, I'd settle for any M1911 model, so long as it's not that ******** DEagle-brand M1911. I refuse to buy anything Magnum Research has sullied. I wasnt even aware that magnum research built one o.o "DEagle brand 1911" spawned "DEagle brand DEagle". looks like a gag poster. I watched some vids of them and saw a review just now. they seem like a decent pistol for the money. http://www.gunblast.com/DesertEagle1911.htm It is, but it's a brilliant gag. xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:57 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:28 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:46 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:16 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Recon_Ninja_985 looking at an S&W 1911PD opinions / objections about this pistol? Price. For that kind of price, get a Kimber and regret nothing. Also, Remington has a new 1911, and given Remington's history of Colt copies, I'm enthusiastic. And for $700, I think it's a pretty good deal. price of the S&W is pretty standard for most 1911's
probably would go with kimber due to their reputation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 11:24 am
|
|
|
|
Fresnel Smokestack Lightning L.A.R. Grizzly Mk 1 Long Slide in .357 Magnum that's my dream 1911. A weak enough cartridge to where I don't have to change the return spring every 1000 rounds. Why not a Para in .38 Super? It's easily a more effective round (bridging the .38/.357 gap), and it's one actually made to be used in an autopistol. Really now. You're going to combat a .38 Super to a .357 Magnum?
Notice my longslide statement and then look at the .357 magnum statement in my post. Why do you think I picked it out?
Seriously you think a .38 super longslide compares to a .357 magnum longslide?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:40 pm
|
|
|
|
Smokestack Lightning Fresnel Smokestack Lightning L.A.R. Grizzly Mk 1 Long Slide in .357 Magnum that's my dream 1911. A weak enough cartridge to where I don't have to change the return spring every 1000 rounds. Why not a Para in .38 Super? It's easily a more effective round (bridging the .38/.357 gap), and it's one actually made to be used in an autopistol. Really now. You're going to combat a .38 Super to a .357 Magnum? Notice my longslide statement and then look at the .357 magnum statement in my post. Why do you think I picked it out? Seriously you think a .38 super longslide compares to a .357 magnum longslide? if we're going to get into other than .45 caliber 1911's I'd opt for a 10mm Kimber eclipse or dan wesson razorback
hit em with the centimeter shooter
though I dont see whats really wrong with .45acp. plenty of killing potential without too much risk of overpenetrating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|